Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Ministry of Justice

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

Baroness Scotland of Asthal Excerpts
Friday 9th January 2026

(2 days, 20 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Falconer of Thoroton Portrait Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I hope I have given a satisfactory answer in relation to that.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal Portrait Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I declare an interest as a former deputy High Court judge and recorder. Does the noble and learned Lord not think that one way of curing his concern in relation to the multidisciplinary nature of the assessment would be for the assessment to be made earlier in the process and the evidence made available to the court, which could then better make a determination?

Lord Falconer of Thoroton Portrait Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I agree very strongly. This is a different use of the phrase: “multidisciplinary team” relates to the people treating the person. The more input they can have, the better. With respect to the noble and learned Baroness, I am not sure that bears on the question of whether panel or court is better because, whichever route is taken, one would hope that, at the stage where either the panel or the court is making a decision, it would have access to what the multidisciplinary team treating the patient thought about the patient.

Baroness Scotland of Asthal Portrait Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, if I may just assist the noble and learned Lord, the reason I think it relevant is that if that multidisciplinary assessment is available, and the court has that evidence available to it, together with any other assessment made by individual additional clinicians, the court can then make an informed assessment as to which method or approach it is minded to deal with, particularly when it does not necessarily agree with the evidence of one particular clinician from whom it has had the benefit of hearing. That is the reason I think it might be useful.

Lord Falconer of Thoroton Portrait Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not understand that proposition. It seems to me that the panel is able to take that into account just as well as the court—and, indeed, I think the panel would probably be better able to assess it. I am not sure I accept that proposition.