Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons

Debate between Baroness Royall of Blaisdon and Lord Reid of Cardowan

Thursday 29th August 2013 Lords Chamber

[Lord Reid of Cardowan]

My Lords—

[Baroness Royall of Blaisdon]

My Lords—

Arrangement of Business

Debate between Baroness Royall of Blaisdon and Lord Reid of Cardowan

Wednesday 31st October 2012 Lords Chamber

[Baroness Royall of Blaisdon]

My Lords, might I answer that point? I shall ask my noble friend whether he will agree to place the opinion of counsel in the Library of the House alongside that of the Clerk of the House.

[Lord Reid of Cardowan]

My Lords, I may be the only one, but, further to the clarification which the Leader gave, I am now more confused than ever. He appeared to say that it would be open to this House to agree to proceed with a debate, but that it would not be open to it to deny a debate if the mover of the amendment insisted on proceeding with it. Did I understand him correctly and, if that is the case, does that apply to other Members of this House who have their name to the amendment? In other words, if any of them insisted on going ahead, must a debate take place? That is now my understanding of what the Leader said in his clarification. If he could confirm that, I would be obliged.