Information between 3rd March 2025 - 23rd March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 135 |
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 141 |
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179 |
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177 |
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165 |
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 168 |
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Royall of Blaisdon voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257 |
Written Answers |
---|
Gender Based Violence
Asked by: Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress they have made in rolling out the "Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) 100" approach to every police force in the country. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) As part of this Government's ambitious goal to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, we have committed to use every tool available to protect more women and girls from harm, to relentlessly target perpetrators including via methods used to tackle terrorism and serious organised crime, and other measures to improve the police response to VAWG. Working closely with the National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing, the Home Office is overseeing the development of a new national approach for the use of data-driven tools and algorithms to identify and pursue offenders involved in domestic abuse, sexual assault, harassment, and stalking. Recognising the range of applicable technologies already in use across police forces in England and Wales, the new framework will support forces to meet their local need while standardising the use of these tools, ensuring those who pose the greatest threat are identified and managed through the criminal justice system or community-based, multi-agency interventions. In February, we announced £13.1 million funding to launch a new National Centre for VAWG and Public Protection to improve the policing response to VAWG and child sexual abuse. Centralising policing expertise to tackle these crimes will drive national coordination. The creation of the Centre is a key step in delivering on the Government's public protection priorities through bringing together expertise to drive organisational change and improve practice, and work on the use of data-driven tools in VAWG policing is central to this. Later this year we will publish a cross-government VAWG strategy, unpinning the ambitious agenda to halve VAWG and tackle the most prolific and harmful perpetrators. |