Debates between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Mon 11th Jul 2011
Thu 7th Jul 2011
Thu 16th Jun 2011
Tue 12th Oct 2010

Children: Television

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Monday 21st November 2011

(13 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My noble friend Lord Brooke brings up a very important point. That is why the communications review Green Paper is being discussed at the moment. In the new year we will publish the Green Paper, through which all these ideas will be fed in to the Secretary of State before the Bill comes to this House.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Will the noble Baroness draw this exchange to the attention of Ofcom and, when she does so, will she express her own view that it should be higher up the list and not be down at the bottom? Will she do that?

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

Yes, my Lords; the EPG prominence is an extremely important tool for making certain that as many people as possible have easy access to the full range and diversity of the PSB channels. However, we intend to take the opportunity of the communications review to look into this properly, to make certain that we have a fit-for-purpose system for the long term.

BBC: Licence Fee

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Monday 7th November 2011

(13 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My Lords, my noble friend makes a very valid point, which I would expect from him with all his knowledge and consistent interest in broadcasting. The Question clearly addresses the next stage from his previous Question in your Lordships' House on the licence fee in October 2010. Following the phone hacking issue, he is right that plurality continues to be on the agenda. That needs to include all media and I understand his wish for more independent radio providers. Indeed, local commercial radio stations provide a wide range of national and local news—around 8 million minutes of news every year. We believe, too, that there are a number of ways of supporting such news provision and we will consider these in the forthcoming communications review.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

While diversity is important, does the Minister accept that the news broadcasting services of the BBC are truly remarkable and we have to protect them, not least because of the importance of the World Service? I worry when we talk about watering down the BBC's news service, which frankly is the oxygen of publicity that we need in a democracy.

Phone Hacking

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Monday 11th July 2011

(13 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My noble friend Lady Bonham-Carter asks—this has been mentioned once before—about the resignation of somebody working for a public company. It is up to the chairman and chief executive to look into whether someone should resign, whether it is Rebekah Brooks herself or Mr Murdoch, but it is not up to the Government to interfere on that matter.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it is a mere 20 years since I introduced my Freedom and Responsibility of the Press Bill in the House of Commons, so I think I am making good progress when I see what is happening today. We used to talk then about the problem of some of the practices in the press, which included things such as offering payments to the police. We did not know about hacking then. The first point I want to emphasise is that we must make sure that this is not just about the News of the World. It is a great pity that a newspaper has been sacrificed because a chief executive would not do the decent thing and resign.

The second point is that the Minister said, citing the Culture Secretary in the other House, that the job of the media is to hold people in power to account. That is absolutely right, but as we were saying 20-odd years ago, the problem is that no one holds the press to account. How on earth can we even think of allowing Rupert Murdoch to have such control over the British media? It really should not go ahead for that reason alone. My final point, which is very important following what the Prime Minister said, is: have the Government any idea what they are going to replace the Press Complaints Commission with?

BSkyB

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Thursday 7th July 2011

(13 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My noble friend asks an important question. The Prime Minister said yesterday at Question Time that there would be two reviews, and the Cabinet is discussing the remits for those reviews. Two areas will be looked into: one is the police investigation and the other is the practice of press regulation.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords—

--- Later in debate ---
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My noble friend brings up the importance and involvement of the police. We are talking about criminal cases here that are under investigation. It would be wrong to prejudge. In this whole area, the Secretary of State has been very fair and very transparent in putting everything in front of the House. We have had many debates on this. My noble friend Lord Fowler has asked questions on this; I am afraid I do not see him in his place today. We know that any payments regarding the police are against the law.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords—

Telephone Hacking

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Thursday 16th June 2011

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My noble friend Lord Fowler is extremely knowledgeable and experienced on this subject. I have read the details that he mentioned, but I need to make it clear from the start that my answers will cover only press regulations and not the criminal aspects. I know that your Lordships are well aware that the criminal aspects of hacking are covered by the Home Office. We do, however, fully understand my noble friend’s request for a further inquiry to be set up after the present cases are resolved. We are witnessing a revolution in the information and communications world, as in technology in general, of such galloping speed that I can only agree with my noble friend that constant monitoring is essential in case further action is needed.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

With regard to the comments made by the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, I agree and understand the Minister’s case that she cannot do anything while court proceedings are possible. However, News International, and Rupert Murdoch particularly, have a history of avoiding publicity when there have been bad cases. There was another case of a former editor of the Sun—a very serious sexual assault case in the office. The editor was finally dismissed and large sums of money were paid, but nothing was public because it was hushed up by a conditional agreement in court by News International. There is a major problem about the way in which that group operates. I accept entirely that it has to be after the court case, but there really has to be some sort of inquiry.

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

The noble Lord, Lord Soley, makes an important point about BSkyB and News Corporation. The Secretary of State has to make a quasi-judicial decision about the impact of the proposed merger on media plurality. Going back to his pinpointing regarding one newspaper, it was interesting that in February 2010 the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee published a report on press reporting that included the examination of the phone-hacking episode. It was critical of the News of the World and the police and stated that it did not find it credible that such an activity was limited to just one rogue reporter. However, according to recent press interviews, the noble Lord, Lord Mandelson, said:

“It really isn’t acceptable to keep pointing the finger at one newspaper when, clearly, the use of unlawful means of investigating was, or is, widespread”.

BBC: Licence Fee

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Soley
Tuesday 12th October 2010

(14 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I am so pleased that my noble friend Lord Fowler has asked me this supplementary as the House knows that he is probably the most knowledgeable and experienced Peer on this subject. It is important to me and it gives me the chance to stress that the Government are fully committed to the principle of the licence fee as the primary method of funding the BBC. As the noble Lord will know more than most, with the development of technology and viewing habits we will need to keep this under review to make certain that current arrangements do not become outdated. The BBC continues to be the jewel in the crown in the UK’s media landscape and the licence fee is fundamental to supporting it.

Lord Soley Portrait Lord Soley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have some sympathy with the broad comments about the licence fee but does the Minister accept that it makes it even more important that the Government take a very clear view against the takeover of BSkyB by News Corporation?