Information between 15th November 2025 - 15th December 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 81 Noes - 132 |
|
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223 |
|
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Pinnock voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Railways: Planning
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 9th December 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether Platform4 is required to consider the need for future railway expansion on existing railway land before allocating land for commercial or housing development. Answered by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill - Minister of State (Department for Transport) Network Rail are required to consider the need for future railway expansion on existing railway land before allocating land for commercial or housing development, under condition 17 of their network license (LC17). LC17 is an industry process, and most railway partners have the opportunity to respond to any current, future and integrated transport proposals. Establishing Platform4 has not changed this process. Platform4 will continue to work with Network Rail on the LC17 process as part of their support to the development for major stations and regional schemes. |
|
Housing: Construction
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 9th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by the Minister of State for Housing and Planning on 24 November (HC Deb col 20), whether the call in process for sites capable of accommodating 150 or more housing units near railway stations will include railway stations in rural areas. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the Noble Baroness to the Written Ministerial Statement published and attached on 18 November 2025 (HCWS1062)– noting the statement contains several discrete measures. The Department intends to publish a consultation in due course which provides further detail on the announcement on a new Consultation Direction. |
|
Housing: Construction
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Tuesday 9th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 24 November (HL Deb cols 1154-1155), whether all land around railway stations and capable of accommodating 150 or more housing units can be categorised as brownfield sites. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the noble Lady to the Written Ministerial Statement published and attached on 18 November 2025 (HCWS1062) – noting the statement contains several discrete measures. It will be for planning decision-makers to determine whether land around train stations meets the definition of brownfield (previously developed land) as set out in the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
|
Brownfield Sites: Contamination
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 10th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage on 24 November (HL Deb col 1154), whether severely contaminated brownfield sites will not be developed due to the cost of remediation, and whether they plan for those sites to remain contaminated and derelict. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The National Planning Policy Framework states (attached) that planning policies and decisions should support appropriate opportunities to remediate derelict and contaminated land. It also states that where a site is affected by contamination, responsibility for securing a safe development rests with the developer and/or landowner. Planning Practice Guidance on viability (attached) recognises abnormal costs, including those associated with treatment for contaminated sites.
To unlock previously developed land for housing, the Government provides capital support to local authorities through the Brownfield Land Release Fund. The funding enables councils to undertake necessary remediation works, including decontamination. |
|
Brownfield Sites: Contamination
Asked by: Baroness Pinnock (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Wednesday 10th December 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the brownfield land register includes an assessment of the impact of the level of contamination on the viability of the land for development. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Town and Country Planning (Brownfield Land Register) Regulations 2017 require local planning authorities to prepare, maintain, and publish a Brownfield Register. When including land on the register, local planning authorities must consider that land is suitable, available, and achievable for residential development. This will involve assessing a range of factors and constraints including any known land contamination and viability issues. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
24 Nov 2025, 5:56 p.m. - House of Lords "noble Baroness Pinnock raised the issues about reservoirs. Well, I think the National policy statement " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Nov 2025, 6 p.m. - House of Lords ">> There was concern on the part of Baroness Pinnock non-hazardous reservoirs are specifically small " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
24 Nov 2025, 6:29 p.m. - House of Lords "deliver. I hope I picked up the noble Baroness Pinnock point on " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Dec 2025, 6:20 p.m. - House of Lords "have been proven right, as indeed the noble Baroness Baroness Pinnock " Baroness Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Dec 2025, 7:43 p.m. - House of Lords "said, and as Baroness Pinnock the noble Baroness Pinnock raised, it should be about place shaping, " Lord Jamieson (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Dec 2025, 7:53 p.m. - House of Lords "and owned by local people. This place shaping goes right to the heart of the local government reform that Baroness Pinnock " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Dec 2025, 4:32 p.m. - House of Lords "made by the noble Baroness Pinnock. It's vital that exercising Democratic oversight planning " Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Dec 2025, 4:33 p.m. - House of Lords "In particular, I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to Baroness Boycott, Lord Jamieson, Lord Roborough, Baroness Pinnock and " Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |