Information between 7th September 2026 - 7th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 131 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 138 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 142 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 150 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 120 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 125 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 149 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted No - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour No votes vs 156 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 15th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government how many judicial reviews relating to local government reorganisation are currently in progress. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) Prior to the Secretary of State's oral statement to Parliament on 7 September 2026 on local government reorganisation, six Judicial Review claims had been issued in relation to decisions. The decisions that were the subject of those proceedings have since been withdrawn.
The Department has also received pre-action correspondence in relation to a number of other local government reorganisation decisions. |
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 18th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the capacity of statutory responsible officers in local government in light of ongoing local government reorganisation. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) In designing its support offer for local government reorganisation, the Department engaged with a range of local government stakeholders to understand how to best support the capacity of statutory officers. In response to that feedback, this year the Department put in place a broad support offer including dedicated sector advisers and a wider programme of support to build capacity and capability in councils led by the Local Government Association. This support will continue to be available to councils during the local government reorganisation review. Depending on the outcome of the review, the Department will consider how to best target future support to statutory officers.
|
|
Social and Affordable Homes Programme
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 21st September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government when they will release the first wave of funding for the Social and Affordable Homes Programme. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) In March 2025, the government announced a £2 billion down-payment as part of the Social and Affordable Homes Programme (SAHP). Homes England has already secured over 4,200 starts in 2025/26 through their portion of this.
In August 2026, the government announced initial funding allocations for the SAHP, with £9.58 billion being awarded to 33 Strategic Partners outside London. |
|
Social and Affordable Homes Programme
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 21st September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether non-mayoral authorities will receive funding from the Social and Affordable Homes Programme. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) In August 2026, the government announced the initial Strategic Partnership funding allocations for the Social and Affordable Homes Programme (SAHP). Across England (excluding London), 33 providers will receive funding totalling £9.58 billion to invest in new social and affordable housing and deliver 73,600 homes. These 33 providers included PRPs and councils. No funding has been allocated directly to Mayoral Strategic Authorities (MSA), and whether an area has an MSA was not a factor in decision making. Established Mayoral Strategic Authority (EMSA) areas outside London are able to set the strategic direction of the Programme in their areas. To support this, we have published an estimate of how many homes and how much funding providers expect to deliver in each of the initial six EMSA areas. |
|
Local Government Finance: Devolution
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 14th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to implement further fiscal devolution. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The government has committed to replace grants from central government with a share of local income tax for every mayoral strategic authority from April 2028, and for greater retention of the revenue from business rates for local councils and strategic authorities from April 2027. In addition, all strategic authorities will be provided with the ability to introduce an Overnight Visitor Levy, with mayors able to set out their plans from March 2028. Further details will be set out in a Fiscal Devolution Roadmap, to be published alongside autumn budget. Please refer to the ‘Rewiring the State’ Cabinet Statement (and attached) published on 31 July 2026. |
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 14th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what impact assessment they have undertaken of the effect of local government reorganisation on the financial stability of those local authorities involved. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) As set out by the Secretary of State in her oral statement of 7 September, the Government has withdrawn the March 2026 decisions for Essex, Hampshire, Norfolk and Suffolk, and paused activity for 14 areas while a full review of the local government reorganisation programme is conducted. We recognise the need for clarity and will set out next steps as soon as possible. We keep all aspects of local government finance under review. |
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have issued any guidance to local authorities on electorate sizes as part of the local government re-organisation structural change order process; and what guidance has been issued on multi-member warding’s reorganisation. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what guidance has been issued to the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England on the formation of interim warding arrangements as part of the local government reorganisation process. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what tolerance levels they will deem reasonable with respect to interim warding arrangements as part of the local government reorganisation structural change order process. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether levels of deprivation should be used as a basis of submitting interim warding arrangements as part of the local government reorganisation process which fall out of the tolerance levels advised by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Peterborough City Council: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to the interim warding arrangements submission by Peterborough City Council where one warding proposal stands 20.8% below the tolerance level set out by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Local Government: Reorganisation
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 23rd September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what formal advice they have given to local authorities on reducing the number of Councillors for interim warding arrangements for shadow authority elections. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is the independent body responsible for setting electoral arrangements for councils. However, it cannot undertake an electoral review until a new council has been established in law. Where a proposal is implemented, councils are asked to suggest interim electoral arrangements for inclusion in the legislation establishing the new authority. Neither councils nor Ministers have the power to draw new electoral boundaries through this process. Instead, interim arrangements must be based on existing electoral areas, including district wards, county divisions, parishes and parish wards. Councils are expected to have regard to the Commission's published guidance when developing their suggestions, and the Commission offered support to councils undertaking this work earlier in the year. On 7 September 2026, the Secretary of State announced that implementation of local government reorganisation decisions would be paused in a number of areas while the Government considers next steps for the programme. Proposals for local government reorganisation in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, where no decision has yet been taken, will also be considered as part of that process. The Secretary of State also set out the expectation that elections scheduled for May 2027 will proceed for existing councils. In light of that position and the review, the Government is not currently progressing work on interim warding arrangements and will set out any future requirements relating to local government reorganisation following consideration of these matters.
|
|
Local Government: Lincoln
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 28th September 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has given consideration to the interim warding arrangements submission by Lincoln City Council where a councillor representing the proposed Witham St Hughs ward would represent approximately 4,354 electors, whereas a councillor representing the proposed Minster ward would represent approximately 1,849 electors; and if so, what consideration have they given to the tolerance levels of this proposal. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Housing, Communities and Local Government) The Government has withdrawn the March 2026 decisions for Essex, Hampshire, Norfolk and Suffolk, and paused activity in the other 14 areas, including Lincolnshire, North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire, while a full review of the local government reorganisation programme is undertaken. We recognise the need for clarity and will set out next steps as soon as possible. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
14 Sep 2026, 5:01 p.m. - House of Lords "noble friend Baroness O'Neill of Bexley in what she said in opening the debate from this side of the " Lord Patten (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
14 Sep 2026, 8:58 p.m. - House of Lords "concerns. As this Bill progresses, I will work with my noble friends, Baroness O'Neill of Bexley and Lord Jamieson, to provide scrutiny from " Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
10 Sep 2026, 5:10 p.m. - House of Lords "mentioned by my noble friends Baroness O'Neill of Bexley and Lord " Lord Jamieson (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |