Baroness O'Neill of Bexley

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness O'Neill of Bexley

Information between 14th November 2025 - 13th January 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 134 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 141 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 135 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 133 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 127 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135
24 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 143 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 244
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 144 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 244 Noes - 220
10 Dec 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 144 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 223
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 120 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 130
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 123 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 178
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 121 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 210 Noes - 131
5 Jan 2026 - Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 105 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 132 Noes - 124
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 133 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 219
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 122 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 134 Noes - 185
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 125 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 136
6 Jan 2026 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness O'Neill of Bexley voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Labour Aye votes vs 130 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 209

Speeches
Baroness O'Neill of Bexley speeches from: SEND Budget Funding Baroness O'Neill of Bexley contributed 1 speech (98 words) Wednesday 3rd December 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions

Written Answers
Local Government Finance Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 11th December 2025 Question to the Department for Education: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to deal with historic dedicated schools grant debt. Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) The government recognises that the rising costs of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision is putting a strain on local government finances. The government will work with local authorities to manage their SEND system, including deficits, alongside an extension to the dedicated schools grant statutory override until the end of 2027/28. The government will set out further details on its plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits and conditions for accessing such support through the upcoming local government finance settlement.

Written Answers

Local Government Finance
Asked by: Baroness O'Neill of Bexley (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 11th December 2025

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to deal with historic dedicated schools grant debt.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

The government recognises that the rising costs of special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision is putting a strain on local government finances. The government will work with local authorities to manage their SEND system, including deficits, alongside an extension to the dedicated schools grant statutory override until the end of 2027/28. The government will set out further details on its plans to support local authorities with historic and accruing deficits and conditions for accessing such support through the upcoming local government finance settlement.