Education: Philosophy Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Education: Philosophy

Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve Excerpts
Tuesday 1st November 2022

(2 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I could not agree more with my noble friend.

Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve Portrait Baroness O’Neill of Bengarve (CB)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, I think I have an interest to declare as the only surviving professional philosopher in the House. When I joined your Lordships’ House there were four of us, but the others are no longer with us. So much for the interest. My question is: does the Minister think that what we might call the A-levelisation of philosophy teaching in schools has, on balance, been beneficial, or not?

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the House will forgive me, I am not sure I am entirely familiar with the term “A-levelisation”, but what I do know is that many more students are studying philosophy—almost twice as many in our universities—than are taking the A-level, so whatever we are doing at A-level is equipping our students to choose philosophy as an option later on.