Information between 26th October 2025 - 15th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 195 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 142 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 50 Noes - 115 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 113 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 157 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 139 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 137 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 7 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 185 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 79 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 47 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 136 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 179 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness McIntosh of Pickering voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Prisoner Releases in Error
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (92 words) Thursday 13th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Police: Records
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (44 words) Tuesday 11th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Prison Services: Insourcing
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (36 words) Wednesday 5th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Justice |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Energy Market Reforms
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (56 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Tobacco and Vapes Bill
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 3 speeches (742 words) Committee stage Monday 3rd November 2025 - Grand Committee Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Water Companies: Private Ownership
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (92 words) Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 2 speeches (130 words) Report stage part two Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 4 speeches (451 words) Report stage part three Wednesday 29th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 1 speech (55 words) Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 3 speeches (574 words) Report stage: Part 1 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering speeches from: Planning and Infrastructure Bill
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering contributed 3 speeches (812 words) Report stage: Part 2 Monday 27th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Food: Public Sector
Asked by: Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress they have made on procuring more locally produced foods for schools, prisons, and hospitals. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government is currently assessing the food that the public sector currently buys, specifically its provenance and the standards it conforms to. In due course, this will enable us to determine the extent to which public sector settings are serving food from local producers and what more can be done. |
|
Compulsory Purchase: Infrastructure
Asked by: Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what procedure will be available for those affected by compulsory purchase orders owing to nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) to object following changes to the NSIP regime in the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Development Consent Orders (DCO) for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects may include powers of compulsory acquisition. However, Government guidance related to the procedures for the compulsory acquisition of land continues to expect acquisition by agreement wherever practicable and supports early engagement with affected parties. DCO promoters proposing to seek powers of compulsory acquisition should be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary of State that all reasonable alternatives to compulsory acquisition (including modifications to the scheme) have been explored. The Secretary of State will only authorise compulsory acquisition in circumstances where it is satisfied that the statutory tests in the Planning Act 2008 are met—including that the land is required for the development, or to facilitate or is incidental to the development, and that there is a compelling case in the public interest for the compulsory acquisition. These matters are rigorously tested during the examination stage of an application. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill does not alter these statutory tests or the requirement to notify those with an interest in land once an application is accepted. The Bill removes the duty to consult persons who have an interest in the land, or able to make a relevant claim for compensation, but retains acceptance notification and full participation rights for affected persons. Updated guidance associated with the pre-application stage of DCO applications will set out expectations for engagement with affected persons during the pre-application stage. Landowners, including those affected by proposed compulsory acquisition, are treated as an interested party and are still able to submit a relevant representation to provide their formal comments on the application. This also enables them to participate in the examination, make written submissions, attend hearings, and request compulsory acquisition‑specific hearings. |
|
Compulsory Purchase: Infrastructure
Asked by: Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 14th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill on 30 October (HL Deb col 1496), what protection will be given under the Planning and Infrastructure Bill to those at risk of compulsory purchase of their property owing to developments such as Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects like the expansion at Heathrow Airport. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Development Consent Orders (DCO) for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects may include powers of compulsory acquisition. However, Government guidance related to the procedures for the compulsory acquisition of land continues to expect acquisition by agreement wherever practicable and supports early engagement with affected parties. DCO promoters proposing to seek powers of compulsory acquisition should be able to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Secretary of State that all reasonable alternatives to compulsory acquisition (including modifications to the scheme) have been explored. The Secretary of State will only authorise compulsory acquisition in circumstances where it is satisfied that the statutory tests in the Planning Act 2008 are met—including that the land is required for the development, or to facilitate or is incidental to the development, and that there is a compelling case in the public interest for the compulsory acquisition. These matters are rigorously tested during the examination stage of an application. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill does not alter these statutory tests or the requirement to notify those with an interest in land once an application is accepted. The Bill removes the duty to consult persons who have an interest in the land, or able to make a relevant claim for compensation, but retains acceptance notification and full participation rights for affected persons. Updated guidance associated with the pre-application stage of DCO applications will set out expectations for engagement with affected persons during the pre-application stage. Landowners, including those affected by proposed compulsory acquisition, are treated as an interested party and are still able to submit a relevant representation to provide their formal comments on the application. This also enables them to participate in the examination, make written submissions, attend hearings, and request compulsory acquisition‑specific hearings. |