All 2 Debates between Baroness Manzoor and Lord Naseby

NHS Staffing: Long-term Plan

Debate between Baroness Manzoor and Lord Naseby
Monday 4th February 2019

(5 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - -

We absolutely do. The NHS employs record numbers of staff now compared to any other time in its 70-year history, with significant growth in newly qualified staff over the period from 2012. There are almost 13,400 more nurses on our wards since 2010. However, the noble Baroness is right—the current vacancy levels are not sustainable. Therefore the Government have put several actions in place to increase nursing workforce supply, covering improving staff retention, return to practice, overseas recruitment, expanding nursing associates, improving sickness absence and a review of language controls.

Lord Naseby Portrait Lord Naseby (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Bearing in mind that one of the key problems facing doctors is those leaving the NHS as soon as they qualify—a significant number, both male and female, choose to go abroad—should the Government not have a look at the Singapore system, where they have to sign up for five years once they qualify and after that it is entirely free, regarding their medical practice?

Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend for that question. I am certainly aware of the Singapore model. I reassure him that we are expanding undergraduate medical education by funding an additional 1,500 medical school places in England. We have also recently announced the removal of doctors and nurses from the ambit of the cap on tier 2 visas, which means that all overseas doctors needed in the UK should be able to come and work here. We have more doctors than ever before, but there is no doubt that the pressures are huge. That is why we want to train more doctors. However, I understand the point that my noble friend makes, which is perhaps something we need to consider.

Eating Disorders: Medical Training

Debate between Baroness Manzoor and Lord Naseby
Wednesday 12th September 2018

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - -

My Lords, yes, I do agree. Indeed, the undergraduate curriculum is reviewed by medical schools to standards set by the GMC. Health Education England is currently undertaking a review of the two-year foundation programme, and the curricula for speciality training are currently being reviewed by the GMC and Health Education England and their counterparts in the devolved Administrations. The review is expected to be completed by 2020-21.

Lord Naseby Portrait Lord Naseby (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, bearing in mind the enormous costs of training medical students, is it not time we looked at the system in Singapore, where it is a requirement that all junior doctors, once they qualify, must stay in the health service or otherwise repay the costs of part or the whole of their medical training?

Baroness Manzoor Portrait Baroness Manzoor
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend for that question. I am afraid that I do not know about the scheme in Singapore, but I will certainly look into it. However, many of our undergraduates stay in the NHS, and we value very much the work that they undertake.