To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
OpenAI
Thursday 2nd July 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government what internal governance and approval processes were followed prior to agreeing the Memorandum of Understanding with OpenAI.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

DSIT and OpenAI agreed to a Memorandum of Understanding on 21 July 2025 which built on years of collaboration on a range of issues covering from economic growth to security. Through strategic partnerships with leading frontier model developers, including our Memorandum of Understanding with OpenAI, we aim to accelerate AI-driven economic growth and create opportunities to improve lives across the UK. We are working with OpenAI and other leading AI companies to explore investment in UK infrastructure, improve public services, and rigorously assess the safety and security of new technologies before public release. This MoU is not legally binding.

Ministerial meetings are published according to normal transparency requirements on the GOV.UK website. Over the period (2024–2025) a number of meetings were held between Ministers and OpenAI.


Written Question
Artificial Intelligence: Arts
Monday 29th June 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 18 March (HLWS1419), what progress they have made towards establishing a working group on independent and smaller creative organisations to explore whether there is a role for government to support their ability to license their content.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

On 18 March, we published our report and impact assessment on copyright and AI. This set out where we will do more work with our creative and AI sectors. This summer we will launch a consultation on digital replicas; establish a taskforce on the labelling of AI‑generated content, which will publish an interim report in autumn 2026; and set up a working group to support independent and smaller creatives. Further details will be set out in due course, including on the creator control review and the composition of the taskforce and working group.


Written Question
Artificial Intelligence: Licensing
Monday 29th June 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 18 March (HLWS1419), what progress they have made towards publishing a review of the mechanisms available for creators to control their works online, including standards, technical solutions, and best practice on input transparency.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

On 18 March, we published our report and impact assessment on copyright and AI. This set out where we will do more work with our creative and AI sectors. This summer we will launch a consultation on digital replicas; establish a taskforce on the labelling of AI‑generated content, which will publish an interim report in autumn 2026; and set up a working group to support independent and smaller creatives. Further details will be set out in due course, including on the creator control review and the composition of the taskforce and working group.


Written Question
Artificial Intelligence: Labelling
Monday 29th June 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Statement by Baroness Lloyd of Effra on 18 March (HLWS1419), what progress they have made towards establishing a taskforce on the labelling of AI-generated content.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

On 18 March, we published our report and impact assessment on copyright and AI. This set out where we will do more work with our creative and AI sectors. This summer we will launch a consultation on digital replicas; establish a taskforce on the labelling of AI‑generated content, which will publish an interim report in autumn 2026; and set up a working group to support independent and smaller creatives. Further details will be set out in due course, including on the creator control review and the composition of the taskforce and working group.


Written Question
Internet: Public Consultation
Thursday 18th June 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government what distinction, if any, they will draw between individual and organisational responses to Growing up in the online world: a national consultation, published on 2 March, in evaluating the outcomes of that consultation.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

Human eyes have been involved in every stage of the Growing up in the online world consultation assessment.

Artificial intelligence (AI) was used to help quickly identify themes in the open text responses to the consultation, the process was robust and quality assured, with human review validating and scrutinising the themes AI identified. Policy officials then used the themes to analyse the responses and develop policy alongside wider evidence and stakeholder input.

Ministers considered a wide range of input and evidence before making their policy decisions.


Written Question
Internet: Public Consultation
Thursday 18th June 2026

Asked by: Baroness Kidron (Crossbench - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government how responses to Growing up in the online world: a national consultation, published on 2 March, will be evaluated; whether artificial intelligence will be used in that evaluation; whether it will be used equally across all submissions; and, if not, what criteria will determine which responses are assessed by artificial intelligence and which by officials.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport)

Human eyes have been involved in every stage of the Growing up in the online world consultation assessment.

Artificial intelligence (AI) was used to help quickly identify themes in the open text responses to the consultation, the process was robust and quality assured, with human review validating and scrutinising the themes AI identified. Policy officials then used the themes to analyse the responses and develop policy alongside wider evidence and stakeholder input.

Ministers considered a wide range of input and evidence before making their policy decisions.


Scheduled Event - Tuesday 16th June - Add to calendar
View Source
Lords - Private Notice Question - Main Chamber
Suspension of Anthropic's AI models and UK security
MP: Baroness Kidron
Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 16 Jun 2026
Online Hate Speech

"My Lords, social media is where many people and most young people get their news, but it is owned or controlled by a handful of tech billionaires whose views are shared disproportionately and who represent an existential risk to democracy—as we saw when Elon Musk, the owner of X, tweeted …..."
Baroness Kidron - View Speech

View all Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Online Hate Speech

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 16 Jun 2026
Artificial Intelligence: National Security Implications

"To ask His Majesty’s Government, in light of the decision of the government of the United States to restrict foreign national access to Anthropic’s Claude AI models, Mythos 5 and Fable 5, what assessment they have made of the implications for the United Kingdom’s security; and what alternative sovereign UK …..."
Baroness Kidron - View Speech

View all Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Artificial Intelligence: National Security Implications

Speech in Lords Chamber - Tue 16 Jun 2026
Artificial Intelligence: National Security Implications

"I thank the Minister for that response. President Trump gave less than 90 minutes for Anthropic to make Mythos and Fable unavailable to any non-US citizens. In doing so, the White House went from a position of no AI regulation at all to 100% control. These systems are extremely powerful …..."
Baroness Kidron - View Speech

View all Baroness Kidron (XB - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Artificial Intelligence: National Security Implications