Independent Office for Police Conduct

Debate between Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb and Lord Fowler

Tuesday 16th March 2021 Lords Chamber

[The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)]

I call the noble Lord, Lord King of Bridgwater. No? I call the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb.

[Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (GP)]

My Lords, in my activist world I hear a lot of complaints against the IOPC and its previous incarnation. I am curious about the fact that a lot of former police officers work there as investigators. It has been suggested that the IOPC does not investigate as thoroughly as it might because it has too many former police officers. Has the Home Office paid any attention to that?

House of Lords: Remote Proceedings

Debate between Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb and Lord Fowler

Tuesday 21st April 2020 Lords Chamber

[The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)]

Supplementary question: the noble Lord, Lord Newby.

[Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (GP)]

I think that I was next on the list.

--- Later in debate ---

[The Lord Speaker]

You are right; I beg your pardon. I do apologise for cutting you out.

[Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb]

Thank you, Lord Speaker. That is one aspect of the question that I was about to ask. I want to emphasise the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, that remote voting is already done in other places. Given the advances into virtual sittings that we have made in the past two weeks, I think that remote voting has to come to ensure that there is a democratic aspect to the legislation that we pass.

There is a formula for the allocation of Questions and supplementary questions. I am sure that your Lordships know that the two Greens in the House are very enthusiastic participants in almost its every aspect. I would hate to think that we were excluded because of some weird allocation of Questions. Is that something the committee can look into?