To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
20 Mar 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 200 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 251 Noes - 214
Written Question
Surrogacy: Parental Orders
Friday 15th March 2024

Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government why they do not centrally hold data on the number of Parental Orders awarded each year through the Family Court for England and Wales in cases of surrogacy (1) where the child was born abroad through a commercial surrogacy arrangement, and (2) where the child was born in the United Kingdom through a surrogacy arrangement in which the mother uses her own egg.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The number of these orders is not recorded centrally. The current recording system only collates data on the total number of parental orders made and there is no capability to break the data into further sub-sets of the different types of surrogacy arrangements. Such information can only be obtained through individual analysis of court files at disproportionate cost since they would require a manual search of court records. The Government has no plans to record this information centrally, doing so would require fundamental changes to existing IT systems.

You will be aware that in March 2023 the Law Commission of England and Wales published a joint report with the Scottish Law Commission; “Building families through surrogacy: a new law". The report puts forward recommendations for a robust new system to govern surrogacy in the UK, including recommendations specifically for the family court system.

The Government is currently considering all of the recommendations within the report and will publish a full response in due course. If and when further action is taken in response to the report, we will consider the collection of data in this area rather than risk making piecemeal changes.


Written Question
Surrogacy: Parental Orders
Friday 15th March 2024

Asked by: Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to collect and publish data on the number of Parental Orders awarded each year through the Family Court for England and Wales in cases of surrogacy (1) where  the child was born through a commercial surrogacy arrangement abroad (2) where the child was born in the United Kingdom through a surrogacy arrangement in which the surrogate mother uses her own egg, and (3) where a child was born through surrogacy in this country using the egg of a third party egg donor, and not the egg of the commissioning female parent.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

The number of these orders is not recorded centrally. The current recording system only collates data on the total number of parental orders made and there is no capability to break the data into further sub-sets of the different types of surrogacy arrangements. Such information can only be obtained through individual analysis of court files at disproportionate cost since they would require a manual search of court records. The Government has no plans to record this information centrally, doing so would require fundamental changes to existing IT systems.

You will be aware that in March 2023 the Law Commission of England and Wales published a joint report with the Scottish Law Commission; “Building families through surrogacy: a new law". The report puts forward recommendations for a robust new system to govern surrogacy in the UK, including recommendations specifically for the family court system.

The Government is currently considering all of the recommendations within the report and will publish a full response in due course. If and when further action is taken in response to the report, we will consider the collection of data in this area rather than risk making piecemeal changes.


Division Vote (Lords)
13 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 145 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 165 Noes - 154
Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 11 Mar 2024
Prioritising Early Childhood: Academy of Medical Sciences Report

Speech Link

View all Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Prioritising Early Childhood: Academy of Medical Sciences Report

Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 193
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 199
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 180 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Jenkin of Kennington (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 175 Conservative No votes vs 4 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 187