Information between 28th October 2025 - 7th November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 12 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 9 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 14 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 2 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 2 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 0 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 128 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 8 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 5 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 3 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 0 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 102 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House One of 1 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hoey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Non-affiliated Aye votes vs 1 Non-affiliated No votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Hoey speeches from: Diego Garcia Military Base and British Indian Ocean Territory Bill
Baroness Hoey contributed 3 speeches (1,416 words) 2nd reading Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Hoey speeches from: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill
Baroness Hoey contributed 1 speech (343 words) Report stage Monday 3rd November 2025 - Lords Chamber Home Office |
|
Baroness Hoey speeches from: Control of Mercury (Enforcement) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Baroness Hoey contributed 3 speeches (1,037 words) Thursday 30th October 2025 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Royal College of Defence Studies: Israel
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the recent ceasefire in the war in Gaza has changed the decision of the Royal College of Defence Studies to ban Israeli soldiers next year. Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Royal College of Defence Studies is a constituent part of the Ministry of Defence (MOD), responsible for the implementation of UK Government policy.
The UK has a long history of providing assistance to other nations in the security and justice fields and continues to do so around the world. UK training courses promote British values, including human rights, democracy, and compliance with international humanitarian law.
The MOD decided to pause future Israeli participation on UK training and education courses until the situation in Gaza and the West Bank had been satisfactorily addressed. Since the ceasefire we have continued to monitor the situation in Gaza and the West Bank, and we will keep this decision under review.
|
|
Terrorism: Northern Ireland
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government whether the interstate case Ireland v UK II has been stayed by the European Court of Human Rights pending the Supreme Court's judgment in the case Dillon and Others vs Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, and whether they intend to make representations to the government of Ireland to formally withdraw that legal action. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, introduced last week, will give effect to the UK Government’s commitments in the Framework announced with the Irish Government on 19 September. This Framework reflects the principles of the Stormont House Agreement and contains sovereign commitments by both governments. While the Interstate case is a matter for the Irish Government, we expect that the implementation of this Framework will result in the withdrawal of the case. |
|
Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Friday 31st October 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government how many Troubles-related civil suits against government departments were stopped by the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023; what legal categories they fall under; and whether they will all be permitted to continue after the enactment of the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Existing civil cases were not barred from proceeding by the Legacy Act. The Government is, by way of a Remedial Order, repealing the retrospective bar on new civil cases and the bar on future civil cases, which was found to be incompatible with our human rights obligations. It is right that citizens in all parts of the UK have the right to bring a civil case, and these are not necessarily cases against government departments. For example, four individuals were found responsible for the Omagh bombing in the civil courts in 2009. |
|
Veterans: Northern Ireland
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Friday 31st October 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government which of the six protections, rights and safeguards announced by the Ministry of Defence on 19 September for veterans who served in Northern Ireland are featured in the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill; which will not feature in the legislation; which will be exclusive to soldiers and police officers; and which will have universal application. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) All of the protections that the Government has announced are being introduced in order to protect and ensure fair treatment of any veteran who is asked to engage with legacy mechanisms.
Measures set out in the legislation, including the right to give evidence remotely and having regard to the welfare of witnesses, will necessarily apply to others. This will ensure, for example, that former police officers are able to avail of these measures.
Some other non-legislative measures will apply only to veterans, including the protection from cold calling and the new safeguard that ensures veterans do not have to give unnecessary evidence on historical context and general operational details. |
|
Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Friday 31st October 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the estimated cost of legal fees for Troubles-related civil suits stopped by the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023; what is the likely compensation; and whether new troubles civil suits will be permitted after the implementation of the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Existing civil cases were not barred from proceeding by the Legacy Act. In terms of future cases, the Remedial Order will repeal the retrospective bar on new civil cases and the bar on future civil cases, which has been found to be incompatible with our legal obligations. It is not possible to predict potential future proceedings. |
|
Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial) Order 2025
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Friday 31st October 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what are their reasons for making the draft Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 (Remedial) Order 2025 instead of using primary legislation; and why the changes proposed in the Remedial Order cannot be incorporated in the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Remedial order will provide clarity as quickly as possible, and correct incompatibilities identified by the Northern Ireland courts, especially on two issues of significant public interest i.e. the removal of the immunity provisions and the removal of the bar on Troubles-related civil cases.
Providing clarity on these matters via the Remedial Order allows us to increase trust in the Commission.
|
|
Northern Ireland Troubles Bill
Asked by: Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated - Life peer) Friday 31st October 2025 Question to the Northern Ireland Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to remarks by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on 14 October (HC Deb cols 246–7), why the Advocate General is specified in the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill as the individual responsible for stopped inquests. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The reference in the Bill to the Advocate General for Northern Ireland reflects their specific role in relation to Northern Ireland. However, we have made clear this is a function that may be exercised by the Solicitor General for England and Wales in accordance with section 2 of the Law Officers Act 1997. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:34 p.m. - House of Lords "amendment has been moved by Baroness Hoey at the end to insert the word set out on the Order Paper. " Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:36 p.m. - House of Lords "Baroness Hoey motion. There is no doubt that one of our greatest. National institutions is. " Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:37 p.m. - House of Lords "specific Northern Ireland point, but we heard fairly powerful speech in the noble Baroness Hoey from the " Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:26 p.m. - House of Lords ">> The question is that the motion be agreed to. Amendment Baroness Hoey. >> I can I say how nice it is to " Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:08 p.m. - House of Lords ">> To make a few comments in relation to this regret motion standing in the name of Baroness Hoey. And I'm grateful for her " Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:10 p.m. - House of Lords "Morrow and Lord Weir and by Baroness Hoey. It is. It is an " Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:15 p.m. - House of Lords "her. I'd also like to thank Baroness Hoey for the the opportunity to have this debate, " Baroness Suttie (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:19 p.m. - House of Lords ">> My Lords I welcome Baroness Hoey regret motion because it allows us to debate a very important subject, important from two councils we " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:19 p.m. - House of Lords "Hodge regret motion. >> My Lords I welcome Baroness Hoey " Baroness Suttie (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:19 p.m. - House of Lords "want to congratulate Baroness the noble Lady Baroness Hoey on two counts. And first of all, her " Lord Blencathra (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:44 p.m. - House of Lords "for introducing this debate and also Baroness Hoey for her motion. " Lord Reay (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:50 p.m. - House of Lords "and I am very grateful for that. But I do want to say that Baroness Hoey is right on one key point. I have friends in the Irish Republic " Lord Bew (Crossbench) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:54 p.m. - House of Lords "answer is. I should also say as well, I appreciate, I think, and I think Baroness Hoey made reference " Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:54 p.m. - House of Lords "concerning, which has been highlighted by Baroness Hoey and others, the underlying issues " Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 3:56 p.m. - House of Lords "particularly hard hit. But that balance in place, I think we can, I think, as Baroness Hoey indicated, " Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:01 p.m. - House of Lords "immigration, for example, to, as Baroness Hoey indicated, the selling of poppies, which are " Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
30 Oct 2025, 4:03 p.m. - House of Lords ">> Minister, for her very clear introduction to this statutory instrument, and also thank the noble Lady Baroness Hoey for raising this issue, even though I'm " Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Nov 2025, 6:25 p.m. - House of Lords "them from the country for a similar reason. The noble lady Baroness Hoey set up. They were an EU " Lord Harper (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
3 Nov 2025, 6:54 p.m. - House of Lords "I finish the noble Baroness Hoey asked me an important issue, and I just want to give her a response on " Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
4 Nov 2025, 6:40 p.m. - House of Lords "made very clearly by Baroness Hoey recently, and by my good friend Lord Bellingham, which is the " Lord Horam (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |