Information between 21st February 2026 - 13th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 148 |
|
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 150 |
|
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 188 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 105 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Conservative No votes vs 3 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 110 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Hodgson of Abinger voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger speeches from: International Women’s Day
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger contributed 1 speech (887 words) Friday 6th March 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Cattle: Exports
Asked by: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 5th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether unweaned calves born in the UK are transported to Ireland to be exported to EU countries. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) No, there have been no recorded exports of cattle, including unweaned calves, for slaughter or fattening from Great Britain to the EU since 2018. The Animal Welfare (Livestock Exports) Act 2024 made it an offence to export livestock and horses for slaughter and fattening from Great Britain. |
|
Meat: Ritual Slaughter
Asked by: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether hospitality sector venues must state when non-stunned meat is being served. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government encourages the highest standards of animal welfare at slaughter. All animals must be stunned before slaughter to make them unconscious and insensible to pain. The only exception to this is when animals are slaughtered in accordance with religious rites, for the food of Muslims and Jews.
The Government would prefer all animals to be stunned before slaughter but respects the rights of Jews and Muslims to eat meat prepared in accordance with their religious beliefs.
There are no regulations that require the labelling of meat from animals slaughtered without stunning, but the Government expects industry to provide consumers with information on which to make an informed choice about their food. Any information provided on the method of slaughter must be accurate and not misleading to the consumer. Major retailers have sourcing policies requiring that fresh meat comes from animals that have been stunned before slaughter. They may operate limited concessions for halal or kosher food that will be clearly labelled. Stunning before slaughter is also required by some farm assurance schemes, such as Red Tractor and RSPCA Assured. Restaurants and other food businesses may, on request, advise whether the foods they sell are certified as halal and whether the animals were stunned before slaughter. Under existing rules, all food information provided by out‑of‑home businesses must be accurate and must not mislead consumers.
There are no regulations that prevent meat from animals slaughtered without stunning from being exported. The 2024 Food Standards Agency Slaughter Sector Survey sets out reported destinations for meat, including whether it was exported. |
|
Meat: Ritual Slaughter
Asked by: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether non-stunned meat is exported from the UK. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government encourages the highest standards of animal welfare at slaughter. All animals must be stunned before slaughter to make them unconscious and insensible to pain. The only exception to this is when animals are slaughtered in accordance with religious rites, for the food of Muslims and Jews.
The Government would prefer all animals to be stunned before slaughter but respects the rights of Jews and Muslims to eat meat prepared in accordance with their religious beliefs.
There are no regulations that require the labelling of meat from animals slaughtered without stunning, but the Government expects industry to provide consumers with information on which to make an informed choice about their food. Any information provided on the method of slaughter must be accurate and not misleading to the consumer. Major retailers have sourcing policies requiring that fresh meat comes from animals that have been stunned before slaughter. They may operate limited concessions for halal or kosher food that will be clearly labelled. Stunning before slaughter is also required by some farm assurance schemes, such as Red Tractor and RSPCA Assured. Restaurants and other food businesses may, on request, advise whether the foods they sell are certified as halal and whether the animals were stunned before slaughter. Under existing rules, all food information provided by out‑of‑home businesses must be accurate and must not mislead consumers.
There are no regulations that prevent meat from animals slaughtered without stunning from being exported. The 2024 Food Standards Agency Slaughter Sector Survey sets out reported destinations for meat, including whether it was exported. |
|
Meat: Ritual Slaughter
Asked by: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government whether non-stunned meat is sold to the general market; and if so, whether that meat is identified as having been produced by non-stun slaughter. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government encourages the highest standards of animal welfare at slaughter. All animals must be stunned before slaughter to make them unconscious and insensible to pain. The only exception to this is when animals are slaughtered in accordance with religious rites, for the food of Muslims and Jews.
The Government would prefer all animals to be stunned before slaughter but respects the rights of Jews and Muslims to eat meat prepared in accordance with their religious beliefs.
There are no regulations that require the labelling of meat from animals slaughtered without stunning, but the Government expects industry to provide consumers with information on which to make an informed choice about their food. Any information provided on the method of slaughter must be accurate and not misleading to the consumer. Major retailers have sourcing policies requiring that fresh meat comes from animals that have been stunned before slaughter. They may operate limited concessions for halal or kosher food that will be clearly labelled. Stunning before slaughter is also required by some farm assurance schemes, such as Red Tractor and RSPCA Assured. Restaurants and other food businesses may, on request, advise whether the foods they sell are certified as halal and whether the animals were stunned before slaughter. Under existing rules, all food information provided by out‑of‑home businesses must be accurate and must not mislead consumers.
There are no regulations that prevent meat from animals slaughtered without stunning from being exported. The 2024 Food Standards Agency Slaughter Sector Survey sets out reported destinations for meat, including whether it was exported. |
|
Meat: Ritual Slaughter
Asked by: Baroness Hodgson of Abinger (Conservative - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what controls are in place, if any, to ensure that non-stunned meat is only sold to the relevant religious communities. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government encourages the highest standards of animal welfare at slaughter. All animals must be stunned before slaughter to make them unconscious and insensible to pain. The only exception to this is when animals are slaughtered in accordance with religious rites, for the food of Muslims and Jews.
The Government would prefer all animals to be stunned before slaughter but respects the rights of Jews and Muslims to eat meat prepared in accordance with their religious beliefs.
There are no regulations that require the labelling of meat from animals slaughtered without stunning, but the Government expects industry to provide consumers with information on which to make an informed choice about their food. Any information provided on the method of slaughter must be accurate and not misleading to the consumer. Major retailers have sourcing policies requiring that fresh meat comes from animals that have been stunned before slaughter. They may operate limited concessions for halal or kosher food that will be clearly labelled. Stunning before slaughter is also required by some farm assurance schemes, such as Red Tractor and RSPCA Assured. Restaurants and other food businesses may, on request, advise whether the foods they sell are certified as halal and whether the animals were stunned before slaughter. Under existing rules, all food information provided by out‑of‑home businesses must be accurate and must not mislead consumers.
There are no regulations that prevent meat from animals slaughtered without stunning from being exported. The 2024 Food Standards Agency Slaughter Sector Survey sets out reported destinations for meat, including whether it was exported. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 11th March 2026
Declarations of interest - Member Declarations of Intrests (5 March 2026) Childhood Vaccinations Committee Found: Holds 80 shares in AstraZeneca (currently worth around £10,000), who produce vaccines Baroness Hodgson of Abinger |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Monday 2nd March 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 9th March 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Childhood Vaccinations View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 16th March 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Childhood Vaccinations View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 23rd March 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Childhood Vaccinations View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 13th April 2026 2 p.m. Childhood Vaccinations Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026
Childhood Vaccinations Childhood Vaccinations Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions No description available |