Information between 12th September 2025 - 22nd October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 175 |
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 189 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 117 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Helic voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 2 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Helic speeches from: Starvation as a Weapon of War
Baroness Helic contributed 1 speech (807 words) Thursday 16th October 2025 - Grand Committee Leader of the House |
|
Baroness Helic speeches from: Gaza: UN Commission of Inquiry Report
Baroness Helic contributed 2 speeches (117 words) Thursday 18th September 2025 - Lords Chamber |
|
Baroness Helic speeches from: Ethiopia and Eritrea
Baroness Helic contributed 1 speech (74 words) Tuesday 16th September 2025 - Lords Chamber |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Genocide Convention
Asked by: Baroness Helic (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 26th September 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, in the light of the Foreign Secretary’s letter to the International Development Committee regarding arms exports to Israel dated 1 September, what steps they are taking in accordance with the United Kingdom’s obligations under Article I of the Genocide Convention to prevent genocide where there is a serious risk. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) I refer the noble Baroness to the responses I gave on this matter in the house on 18th September. |
|
Sudan: Armed Conflict
Asked by: Baroness Helic (Conservative - Life peer) Friday 26th September 2025 Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, with regard the United National Security Council Resolution 2736 on 13 June 2024 calling for an end to the siege of El Fasher, and the statement by the Foreign Secretary on 13 August condemning the atrocities by the Rapid Support Forces, what steps they are taking (1) to ensure the safe delivery of food and medical supplies to civilians, (2) to press for accountability for sexual and gender-based violence identified by the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Sudan, and (3) to strengthen the Sudan sanctions regime, including measures to curb the supply of arms, drones and mercenaries. Answered by Baroness Chapman of Darlington - Minister of State (Development) The crimes committed in Sudan demand accountability. This is why, as a member of the Human Rights Council Core Group for Sudan, the UK led the establishment of the UN Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) in October 2023. We are currently working with partners to secure an extension to its mandate in October. The FFM is essential if the facts concerning alleged violations and abuses of human rights and international humanitarian law are to be thoroughly investigated. This year, the UK is also supporting the deployment of a specialist sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) investigator to the FMM. This contribution ensures expert input on SGBV to strengthen accountability for conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV) in Sudan. Beyond the UN, the UK strongly supports the International Criminal Court's ongoing investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur, including SGBV and CRSV. As UN Security Council (UNSC) penholder on Sudan we have negotiated products calling for all member states to abide by their obligations under the Darfur arms embargo, first imposed in July 2004. This month, we worked closely with the US and UNSC members to renew the UNSC arms embargo regime. The UK proposed language to strengthen the regime, expressing concern about conflict related sexual violence (CRSV). This was incorporated into the text, and the resolution was subsequently adopted by consensus. As a permanent member of the UNSC, the UK also supported the imposition of UN sanctions on two Rapid Support Forces (RSF) generals for their crimes against civilians in Darfur in November 2024. In addition, there is a longstanding UK arms embargo in place for the whole of Sudan. Since the outbreak of conflict in April 2023, the UK has also frozen the assets of nine commercial entities linked to the warring parties. Although we do not speculate on future sanctions designations as it would undermine their effectiveness, our sanctions policy is continually under review. |
|
Hares: Conservation
Asked by: Baroness Helic (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what progress has been made towards the introduction of a statutory close season for hares in England; whether they have identified a legislative vehicle for that purpose; and when they intend to bring forward that legislation. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) A statutory close season for hares is consistent with Natural England's advice on wildlife management that controlling species in their peak breeding season should be avoided unless genuinely essential and unavoidable. Defra Ministers support the ambition to introduce a close season for hares in England.
However, the Government needs a suitable primary legislative vehicle in place to deliver this change. While I cannot therefore offer a timeframe for bringing this legislative change forward, Defra will do its utmost to identify suitable opportunities to enable the Government to introduce a close season for hares in England.
|
|
Hares: Conservation
Asked by: Baroness Helic (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what consideration they have given to introducing interim measures to protect hares during their breeding season pending the introduction of a statutory close season. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We have not considered any interim legislative measures to protect hares during their breeding season pending the introduction of a statutory close season. However, it is reasonable to assume that changes to hare coursing legislation, brought in under the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022, along with improved police tactics, intelligence and information sharing as well as the use of community protection notices (CPN) and criminal behaviour orders (CBO), has had an effect in terms of reducing levels of hare coursing in recent years, both within the hares’ breeding season and outside it. We are also committed to delivering our legally-binding biodiversity targets on species abundance, species extinction and habitat creation and restoration. This is helping to drive forward action to improve habitat such as open grassland which brown hares rely on to flourish. |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 17th September 2025
Agendas and papers - Special Inquiry Committee proposals 2026 Liaison Committee (Lords) Found: Butler-Sloss KC, Lord Carlile KC, Lord Anderson of Ipswich KC, Lord Brennan KC, Lord Forsyth, Baroness Helic |