To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Motor Vehicles: Lighting
Friday 26th April 2024

Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of cars that have been sold in the past five years are fitted with headlights which, once dipped, cause dazzle to oncoming traffic; and what discussions they have had with Euro NCAP on that matter.

Answered by Lord Davies of Gower - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

Prior to sale and registration all vehicle manufacturers must demonstrate that the mandatory dipped beam headlamps satisfy detailed technical requirements controlling aim and light emitted to minimise the occurrence of glare to oncoming traffic. In addition, the Government recently committed to carrying out independent research to assess the prevalence of headlamp glare and to identify root causes and potential countermeasures. EURO NCAP does not assess vehicle lighting and no associated discussions have taken place.


Written Question
Health Services: Women
Friday 26th April 2024

Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether it is their policy for the NHS to refer to "people who have ovaries" rather than "women" and whether this phraseology has been market tested with women, including those for whom English is a second language, to ensure that it is fully understood.

Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

It is not Government policy for the National Health Service to refer to ‘people who have ovaries’ and this phraseology has not been market tested. We have been clear that biological sex matters and it is important to use language that recognises the separate health and biological needs of men and women.

For all sex-specific conditions, we expect the language used to put biological sex, for example “women”, front and centre, with biologically-relevant information relating to specific organs or hormones secondary.


Written Question
Motor Vehicles: Lighting
Friday 26th April 2024

Asked by: Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Transport:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will support any proposal at UNECE’s Working Party 29 in June to re-establish the Informal Working Group on (vehicle headlight) glare.

Answered by Lord Davies of Gower - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)

The UK will consider any proposals at UNECE Working Party 29 on their merits based on a range of factors, including the availability and assessment of new independent evidence or justification. The UK government has committed to research headlamp glare to identify root causes and potential countermeasures, which may in due course support the establishment of a UNECE Informal Working Group to develop, amend and implement changes to the appropriate international regulations.


Division Vote (Lords)
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 102 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 177
Division Vote (Lords)
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 112 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
23 Apr 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 110 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 192
Division Vote (Lords)
22 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 211
Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 17 Apr 2024
Cass Review

Speech Link

View all Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Cass Review

Division Vote (Lords)
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 208
Division Vote (Lords)
17 Apr 2024 - Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Lab) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 123 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 195