Found: This proposal is supported by Baroness Hayman.

Found: Letter from Baroness Drake, Chair of the Constitution Committee to Baroness Hayman of Ullock, on the

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 16 September (HL753), why Zolvix oral solution for sheep is authorised and labelled on a separate basis in Great Britain and in Northern Ireland.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Zolvix is licensed in accordance with different regulations in Northern Ireland (NI) and Great Britain. Separate licenses have, however, had no impact on the ability to market Zolvix in either NI or the rest of the United Kingdom (UK). The Government aims to facilitate single licensing on a UK-wide basis where possible, supported by changes to the Veterinary Medicines Regulations in 2024.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 16 September (HL800), whether they have an estimated cost for bringing the water industry into public ownership.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

If the whole water industry was nationalised, share- and debt-holders would need to be compensated, which could cost over an estimated £90 billion. This is based on Ofwat’s Regulatory Capital Value 2024 figures for companies in England and Wales.

The Government has no intention to nationalise water companies. In addition to the significant costs attached, it would take years to unpick the current ownership model, during which time the sector's issues would only get worse. The Government instead wants to tackle the situation as quickly as possible by improving the privatised regulated model.

That is why, alongside providing the regulators new powers to take tougher and faster action through the Water (Special Measures) Bill, the Government has also announced a full review of the water system. This will shape further legislation that will fundamentally transform how the current system works and clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 17 September (HL801), whether the compensation of existing shareholders is a pre-condition for the transfer of ownership of a water company in the Special Administrative Regime to a new owner.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

No, there is no precondition to compensate shareholders in the case of transferring of company to new owner after a Special Administration Regime (SAR). The Procedure for a transfer scheme in a SAR is set out in Schedule 2 to the Water Industry Act 1991.

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether changes have been made to the Border Target Operation Model since 5 July 2024; and what his latest estimate is of the (a) timetable and (b) budget for the introduction of related controls.

Answered by Nick Thomas-Symonds - Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office

Implementation of the Border Target Operating Model (BTOM) is ongoing. On 7 October HMRC announced that the waiver on Safety and Security declarations for EU imports would be extended until 31 January 2025. HMRC readiness activity is now underway. On 8 October my noble friend Baroness Hayman of Ullock laid legislation to extend the Transitional Staging Period until July 2025 for the implementation of import checks and controls on certain sanitary and phytosanitary goods entering Great Britain from certain countries.

There is no specific budget allocated to BTOM. The implementation and updates are the responsibility for each Department and where appropriate for the Devolved Governments.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 12 September (HL Deb cols 168GC–172GC), what assessment they have made of excluding cattle from the catchment areas of salmon spawning streams.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

This is a devolved matter, and the information provided therefore relates to England only. A specific national assessment on excluding cattle from the catchment areas of salmon spawning streams has not been undertaken because the potential impacts of cattle on salmon spawning streams are well documented.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 8 August (HL429), what assessment they have made of the changes that have taken place since the publication of The cost of nationalising the water industry in England by the Social Market Foundation on 5 February 2018, and the impact of these changes on the cost of compensation to stakeholders.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

If the whole water industry was nationalised, share- and debt-holders would need to be compensated, which could cost over an estimated £99 billion. This is based on Ofwat’s Regulatory Capital Value (RCV) 2024 figures for companies in England and Wales. This figure is higher than the Social Market Foundation's 2018 estimates because the industry's RCV has grown over the past six years, following new investment in infrastructure and RPI inflation.

Given the significant costs attached, the Government has no intention to nationalise water companies. It would take years to unpick the current ownership model, during which time the sector's issues would only get worse. The Government instead wants to tackle the situation as quickly as possible by improving the privatised regulated model.

That is why, alongside providing the regulators new powers to take tougher and faster action through the Water (Special Measures) Bill, the Government has also announced a full review of the water system. This will shape further legislation that will fundamentally transform how the current system works and clean up our rivers, lakes and seas for good.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 8 August (HL429), what plans they have to conduct their own analysis on the cost of taking Thames Water into public ownership, and whether they plan to consider alternative calculations from other agencies such as by Moody's Ratings who calculated that the cost would be £14.5 billion.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

We have no plans to nationalise Thames Water or other water companies so are not considering alternative calculations on renationalisation. We continue to carefully monitor the situation at Thames Water. The Government is also focused on tackling the public’s immediate concerns to clean up the nation’s polluted waterways and turn around the sector’s performance.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 23 July (HL Deb col 354) that taking Thames Water into public ownership would "cost billions of pounds and take years to unpick the current ownership model", whether they plan to publish a full analysis of those costs.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The cost of nationalisation was calculated in a report published by the Social Market Foundation titled ‘The cost of nationalising the water industry in England’. The report estimated the costs of nationalising water companies, including Thames Water, would be £90bn. This research draws on a range of existing academic studies, as well as publicly available data from Ofwat, the London Stock Exchange and the annual accounts of the water companies. The research can be viewed on the Social Market Foundation’s website www.smf.co.uk.

Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 23 July (HL Deb col 364) that nationalisation of water companies “would cost billions of pounds”, whether they plan to provide details of that calculation.

Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The cost of nationalisation was calculated in a report published by the Social Market Foundation titled ‘The cost of nationalising the water industry in England’. The report estimated the costs of nationalising water companies would be £90 billion. This research draws on a range of existing academic studies, as well as publicly available data from Ofwat, the London Stock Exchange and the annual accounts of the water companies. The research can be viewed on the Social Market Foundation’s website www.smf.co.uk.

Found: creation of GBE, but also stressed the importance of community energy. 69 GBE was also welcomed by Baroness

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN LORD LIVERMORE 10_ After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause— “Sustainable

Found: to establish a Regional Wealth Fund and a Skills Training Fund. 5 Crown Estate Bill [HL] BARONESS

Found: must be separately disclosed within the customer’s statement of account. ” 59/1 HL Bill 17—III BARONESS

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK 68_ Clause 5, page 10, line 4, at end insert— “(6) But an offence is

Found: creation of GBE, but also stressed the importance of community energy. 69 GBE was also welcomed by Baroness

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK 68_ Clause 5, page 10, line 4, at end insert— “(6) But an offence is

Found: Clause 5 BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK _ Clause 5, page 10, line 4, at end insert— “(6) But an offence

Found: Clause 5 BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK _ Clause 5, page 10, line 4, at end insert— “(6) But an offence

Found: HAYMAN OF ULLOCK ★_ Clause 5, page 10, line 4, at end insert— “(6) But an offence is to be regarded

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN BARONESS YOUNG OF OLD SCONE LORD TEVERSON LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM 25_ After

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN BARONESS YOUNG OF OLD SCONE LORD TEVERSON LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM _ After Clause

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN BARONESS YOUNG OF OLD SCONE LORD TEVERSON LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM _ After Clause

Found: activities of the Crown Estate in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. 5 Crown Estate Bill [HL] BARONESS

Found: BARONESS HAYMAN BARONESS YOUNG OF OLD SCONE LORD TEVERSON LORD YOUNG OF COOKHAM _ After Clause

Found: Crown Estate Bill [HL] AMENDMENT TO BE MOVED IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE HOUSE After Clause 2 BARONESS

Found: European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (as defined in section 1 of that Act). 77 In the opinion of Baroness

Found: ON REPORT Tabled up to and including 22 May 2024 [Sheets HL Bill 49—R(a) to (e)] Clause 1 BARONESS

Found: ON REPORT Tabled up to and including 21 May 2024 [Sheets HL Bill 49—R(a) to (d)] Clause 1 BARONESS

Found: ON REPORT Tabled up to and including 17 May 2024 [Sheets HL Bill 49(a) to (c)] Clause 1 BARONESS

Found: ON REPORT Tabled up to and including 13 May 2024 [Sheets HL Bill 49(a) to (b)] Clause 1 BARONESS

Found: Offshore Petroleum Licensing Bill AMENDMENT TO BE MOVED ON REPORT Clause 1 BARONESS HAYMAN

Found: LORD DE CLIFFORD BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK 1_ After Clause 1, insert the following new Clause

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness Hayman of Ullock Published 28 October

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness Hayman of Ullock Published 13 September

Found: issued with Certificates of Exemption From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness

Found: Biosecurity Minister Baroness Hayman said:   African swine fever is a deadly disease wreaking havoc

Found: Biosecurity Minister Baroness Hayman said: The permitting of these vaccines forms one part of our efforts

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Veterinary Medicines Directorate and Baroness

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Veterinary Medicines Directorate and Baroness

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, Veterinary Medicines Directorate and Baroness

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness Hayman of Ullock Published 4 September

Found: Signature: BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK Authorised by the Secretary of State Date: 03/09/2024

Found: Signature: BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK Authorised by the Secretary of State Date: 03/09/2024

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness Hayman of Ullock Published 4 September

Found: Signature: BARONESS HAYMAN OF ULLOCK Authorised by the Secretary of State Date: 03/09/2024

Found: From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Baroness Hayman of Ullock Published 4 September

Found: Hayman 30 July 1998 p2 MACF0000174_040 290 Letter from Baroness Hayman to Reverend Tanner 3 September

Found: That has been covered by advances in screening and the ability to make blood products safer. ” Baroness

Found: Biosecurity Minister Baroness Hayman said: The permitting of these vaccines forms one part of our efforts

Found: That has been covered by advances in screening and the ability to make blood products safer. ” Baroness

Found: Hayman 30 July 1998 p2 MACF0000174_040 290 Letter from Baroness Hayman to Reverend Tanner 3 September