Information between 13th May 2024 - 9th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 12th November 2024 Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Oral questions - Main Chamber Subject: Removing the reservation on Article 59 of the Istanbul Convention regarding residence status of domestic abuse victims View calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
14 May 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 124 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 213 |
|
14 May 2024 - Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 121 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 221 Noes - 222 |
|
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 115 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 208 |
|
21 May 2024 - Victims and Prisoners Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 113 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 198 |
|
4 Sep 2024 - Holocaust Memorial Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 79 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 99 |
|
11 Sep 2024 - Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2024 - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 132 |
|
11 Sep 2024 - Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2024 - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 30 Noes - 138 |
|
11 Sep 2024 - Social Fund Winter Fuel Payment Regulations 2024 - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 122 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 132 |
|
4 Nov 2024 - Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 125 Noes - 155 |
|
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 147 |
|
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Nov 2024 - Crown Estate Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 226 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 119 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 132 |
|
6 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 118 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 128 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Food: Labelling
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 17th September 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government when they intend (1) to respond to the consultation by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on fairer food labelling that closed on 7 May, and (2) to bring forward the proposals to improve transparency in method-of-production welfare labelling for pork, chicken and eggs. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Ministers are carefully considering all responses provided to a public consultation on fairer food labelling before deciding on next steps. |
|
Poultry: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Monday 4th November 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, with reference to the decision by the Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs to amend retained Council Regulation 1/2005, which prohibits lifting chickens by the legs in such a way as to cause them unnecessary pain or suffering, what legislative measures they intend to advance to improve the welfare of layer hens and broiler chickens. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We are carefully considering the recommendations in the Animal Welfare Committee’s report on the welfare implications of carrying methods for poultry to ensure the highest standards of animal welfare and will set out next steps in due course. |
|
Poultry: Animal Housing
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Friday 18th October 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to (1) assess case for the phasing-out of cages for layer hens, and (2) launch a consultation on phasing out such cages. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) We are firmly committed to maintaining and improving animal welfare and want to work closely with the farming sector to deliver high standards.
The use of enriched ‘colony’ cages for laying hens is an issue we will want to fully consider in due course. |