Information between 14th October 2025 - 24th October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 57 Noes - 134 |
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 175 |
|
13 Oct 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 147 Noes - 189 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 239 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 204 Noes - 215 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 261 |
|
14 Oct 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 169 Noes - 212 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 139 Noes - 186 |
|
15 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 194 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 175 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 235 Noes - 164 |
|
20 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 154 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 145 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 157 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 138 Noes - 138 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 212 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 253 Noes - 153 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 236 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Gale voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 111 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Fish Farming: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 16th October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure the humane slaughter of farmed fish; and whether they are considering plans to introduce species-specific slaughter legislation for farmed fish. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Current legislation already provides protection for farmed fish kept for the production of meat or other products whilst on farm and during transport. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 makes it an offence to cause unnecessary suffering to any protected animal, including fish, or to fail to provide for the welfare needs of a protected animal, for which that person is responsible. Legislation on the protection of animals at the time of killing also requires that farmed fish are spared avoidable pain, distress or suffering during their killing and related operations. |
|
Fish Farming: Animal Welfare
Asked by: Baroness Gale (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 21st October 2025 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure the humane slaughter of farmed fish; and whether they are they considering plans to introduce species-specific slaughter legislation for farmed fish. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Current legislation already provides protection for farmed fish kept for the production of meat or other products whilst on farm and during transport. The Animal Welfare Act 2006 makes it an offence to cause unnecessary suffering to any protected animal, including fish, or to fail to provide for the welfare needs of a protected animal, for which that person is responsible. Legislation on the protection of animals at the time of killing also requires that farmed fish are spared avoidable pain, distress or suffering during their killing and related operations.
Since publication of the Animal Welfare Committee’s updated Opinion on the welfare of farmed fish at the time of killing a GB-wide joint government-industry working group on farmed trout has been examining the issues raised in the report. This co-design work has made good progress on exploring potential options for more detailed welfare at killing requirements. We are now exploring all the potential next steps, including options for creating detailed guidance and new legislation. |