All 1 Debates between Baroness Fookes and Lord Balfe

Tue 23rd Feb 2016

Trade Union Bill

Debate between Baroness Fookes and Lord Balfe
Tuesday 23rd February 2016

(8 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Fookes Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Baroness Fookes) (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I point out that if Amendment 81 were to be agreed, I could not call Amendments 82 to 82B inclusive by reason of pre-emption.

Lord Balfe Portrait Lord Balfe (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I, too, think that we need a slightly better definition of what is a body that is not a public authority that is “wholly or partly” publicly funded. The example that comes to mind is my local Tesco, which includes a pharmacy and a post office, both of which are of course in receipt of some public money. I wonder whether my noble friend will be revisiting her past by asking the local Tesco to conform. Seriously, this is a reach beyond where I think we should be going. It is becoming all encompassing, and I would like us to row back from going quite as far as the clause appears to be taking us.