Information between 14th April 2026 - 24th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 183 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 188 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 45 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 122 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142 |
|
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 151 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 211 Noes - 150 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 145 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 148 |
|
20 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 142 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 219 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 199 Noes - 146 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 143 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 138 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 197 Noes - 144 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 145 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 152 Noes - 207 |
|
23 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Finn voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 141 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Finn speeches from: Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Baroness Finn contributed 1 speech (696 words) Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Baroness Finn speeches from: Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975 (Amendment) Order 2026
Baroness Finn contributed 1 speech (532 words) Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Lords Chamber Cabinet Office |
|
Baroness Finn speeches from: Single-sex Spaces: Equality and Human Rights Commission Guidance
Baroness Finn contributed 1 speech (102 words) Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Lords Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Chris Wormald
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what was the formula and methodology used to calculate the severance payment of the former Cabinet Secretary Sir Chris Wormald. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Details of payments made to the former Cabinet Secretary will be published in the Annual Report and Accounts for Cabinet Office for the financial year in which the payment was made.
|
|
Chris Wormald
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government why the severance payment to the former Cabinet Secretary Sir Chris Wormald required a Ministerial Direction but the severance payment to his predecessor Lord Case did not; and whether this was due to the amount paid. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Details of any payments made to the previous Cabinet Secretary will be published in the Cabinet Office Annual report and Accounts for 2025-26.
The necessary approvals were given for payments made to Sir Chris Wormald and Lord Case, as set out in the Guidance on Public Sector Exit Payments.
|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 15th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office on 23 March (HC120374), what assessment they have made of any potential conflict of interest of Cabinet Office staff who produced briefing or advised on the due diligence regarding Lord Mandelson's appointment being involved in the selection, scoping and redaction of documentation released to Parliament for the Humble Address of 4 February; and who advises the Propriety and Constitution Group about the mitigation of any conflicts of interests about the actions of the group. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Staff from across the Cabinet Office including but not limited to the Public Inquiry Response Unit and the Propriety and Constitution Group are involved in compliance with the Humble Address motion as necessary, under the leadership of the Cabinet Office Permanent Secretary.
As set out in the Civil Service Code, all civil servants are expected to carry out their roles with dedication and a commitment to core values of integrity, honesty, objectivity and impartiality.
|
|
Propriety and Constitution Group: Recruitment
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 16th April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Minister without Portfolio on 2 December 2025 (HC94697), whether the appointment of the current Director General of the Propriety, Ethics and Constitution Group was a level move or temporary promotion; and whether a Minister approved the appointment without open and fair competition. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The appointment of the current DG Propriety, Ethics and Constitution Group is a temporary promotion. Interim arrangements do not usually require ministerial approval. A recruitment campaign will be launched in due course.
|
|
Prime Minister: Palantir
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office on 18 March (HC119335), and with regard to Ministers' overseas travel and meetings: Publication Guidance, published on 30 January 2025, why the Palantir meeting did not meet the threshold for inclusion in the Prime Minister's quarterly transparency return in line with paragraphs 3(a), 3(b) and 16 of that guidance. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the Noble Lady to the answer given on 5 March, Official Report, PQ HC110411:
Question: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the answer of 13 October 2025 to Question 77563 on Palantir, whether there is a record of who the Prime Minister (a) met and (b) spoke to during that visit.
Answer: The visit was part of the Prime Minister's trip to Washington. During this visit the Prime Minister listened to a short presentation about Palantir’s work, followed by a tour of the premises and an introduction to members of staff.
In December 2025, the MOD signed an extension to the Enterprise Agreement with Palantir that had been initially awarded in November 2022, by the previous Government, and via a direct award. This extension covered existing services and ensured there was no drop-off in MOD capability in critical areas.
This contract - and all other contracts for any firm - go through the usual rigorous departmental processes and their decision makers.
|
|
Ministers: Workplace Pensions
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL15974), whether they plan to amend Ministerial Pension Scheme legislation to allow for pension forfeiture in cases where a minister is found guilty of (1) misconduct in public life, and (2) improper performance under the Bribery Act 2010, relating to their ministerial conduct. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) I refer the Noble Baroness to the response already provided to HL 15974:
Question: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by the Parliamentary Secretary for the Cabinet Office on 23 March (HC120630), what consideration they have given to amending primary legislation to provide for the Ministerial Pension Scheme to be in scope of forfeiture for situations where a former minister is convicted for a criminal offence in relation to their activities while serving as a minister.
Answer: The government does not currently have any plans to amend the Ministerial Pension Scheme.
|
|
Civil Servants: Media
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 23rd April 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 9 April (HL16073), in what manner the disclosure of the publication date of the most recent version of the guidance to the Civil Service on speaking to the media inhibits the future policy development of changes to that guidance. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The guidance on speaking to the media is subject to ongoing policy development. Disclosing the publication date of the most recent version of the guidance could, in conjunction with other information already in the public domain, reveal the stage and direction of that development, which in turn could inhibit the free and frank provision of advice necessary for the policy process to operate effectively.
|
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
41 speeches (6,872 words) Tuesday 14th April 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Mike Wood (Con - Kingswinford and South Staffordshire) I thank the Infected Blood Compensation Authority for its work to speed up the payments.As Baroness Finn - Link to Speech |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Wednesday 15th April 2026
Cabinet Office Source Page: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft Procurement (Amendment) Regulations 2026 debate: guidance and support to contracting authorities in respect of data standards and reporting formats. 2p. Document: 2026-03-31_-_B_Anderson_to_B_Finn_re_Procurement_Regulations_2026.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft |