Information between 19th July 2026 - 27th October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 220 |
|
20 Jul 2026 - Social Housing Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 57 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 146 |
|
21 Jul 2026 - Business of the House - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 234 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 248 Noes - 163 |
|
9 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 138 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 164 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 171 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 165 |
|
7 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 144 |
|
15 Sep 2026 - Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 258 Noes - 109 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 53 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 168 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Armed Forces Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 59 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 259 Noes - 173 |
|
26 Oct 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Doocey voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 49 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 95 Noes - 165 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Police: Pay
Asked by: Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Thursday 22nd October 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to include a specific direction in their next remit letter to the Police Renumeration Review Body to examine and make recommendations on targeted pay frameworks and market supplements for digital, cyber and technical specialists across police forces and the National Crime Agency with the goal of recruiting and retaining specialist technical talent. Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office) The White Paper, ‘From local to national: a new model for policing’ sets out a range of proposals for the police workforce, including the development of a new Police Workforce Strategy. The Police Workforce Strategy will build and support a modern, capable, and sustainable police workforce, ensuring policing has the right people, with the right skills, in the right places, at the right time. It will also enable us to consider how we might make the pay structure for policing more effective, including how policing opportunities compete with the wider employment market. The independent Police Remuneration Review Body, Senior Salaries Review Body and National Crime Agency (NCA) Remuneration Review Body will continue to have a key role to play in advising the Government on the pay and allowances for police and NCA officers, including any changes to existing pay structures. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
26 Oct 2026, 7:06 p.m. - House of Lords " My. My Lords, while we're grateful for the way that the noble Baroness Doocey Ministers. Mrs. has " Amendment: 77 Lord Markham (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript |