Baroness Cash Portrait

Baroness Cash

Conservative - Life peer

Joined House of Lords: 28th January 2025

Shadow Minister (Education)

(since June 2026)

Shadow Minister for Women and Equalities

(since June 2026)

Baroness Cash is not an officer of any APPGs Baroness Cash is not a member of any APPGs
Justice and Home Affairs Committee
6th Mar 2025 - 22nd Jun 2026


Division Voting information

During the current Parliament, Baroness Cash has voted in 240 divisions, and never against the majority of their Party.
View All Baroness Cash Division Votes

Debates during the 2024 Parliament

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Baroness Smith of Malvern (Labour)
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
(17 debate interactions)
Lord Hendy (Labour)
(7 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Home Office
(25 debate contributions)
Department for Work and Pensions
(7 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
View all Baroness Cash's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Baroness Cash, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Baroness Cash has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Baroness Cash has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 14 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
10th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what modelling they have undertaken of the effect of the proposed breadth slots in a reformed Progress 8 on the ranking of the 50 schools with the highest Progress 8 scores in 2025; and whether they intend to publish the model.

The government accepted the Curriculum and Assessment Review's recommendation that Progress 8 should remain the headline key stage 4 performance measure. The government subsequently consulted on possible reforms to the composition of Progress 8 and Attainment 8 and is currently considering the consultation responses. The government will publish its response to the consultation in due course. There was no available Progress 8 data in 2025 because prior attainment data was not available for that cohort. The department has therefore not undertaken modelling of the effect of proposed breadth slots on the ranking of the 50 schools with the highest Progress 8 scores in 2025.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
10th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish their response to the consultation on reform of Progress 8 and Attainment 8 that closed on 4 May.

The government accepted the Curriculum and Assessment Review's recommendation that Progress 8 should remain the headline key stage 4 performance measure. The government subsequently consulted on possible reforms to the composition of Progress 8 and Attainment 8 and is currently considering the consultation responses. The government will publish its response to the consultation in due course. There was no available Progress 8 data in 2025 because prior attainment data was not available for that cohort. The department has therefore not undertaken modelling of the effect of proposed breadth slots on the ranking of the 50 schools with the highest Progress 8 scores in 2025.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
10th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government why they decided to reform Progress 8 and Attainment 8 notwithstanding the recommendation of the curriculum and assessment review that Progress 8 be retained with no change to its structure or subject composition; and what evidence informed that decision.

The government accepted the Curriculum and Assessment Review's recommendation that Progress 8 should remain the headline key stage 4 performance measure. The government subsequently consulted on possible reforms to the composition of Progress 8 and Attainment 8 and is currently considering the consultation responses. The government will publish its response to the consultation in due course. There was no available Progress 8 data in 2025 because prior attainment data was not available for that cohort. The department has therefore not undertaken modelling of the effect of proposed breadth slots on the ranking of the 50 schools with the highest Progress 8 scores in 2025.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
10th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the intensive training and practice requirement of the initial teacher training criteria will be retained without reduction for courses beginning in September 2027.

Intensive training and practice (ITAP) is designed to strengthen trainees’ knowledge, understanding and classroom practice by supporting them to engage with evidence-based approaches, apply learning in practice and receive focused expert feedback.

ITAP was introduced as a requirement for all initial teacher training (ITT) courses leading to qualified teacher status from September 2024 and continues to be an important part of ITT. The department has provided funding to support the implementation of ITAP. This academic year, ITAP funding is conditional on providers ensuring that trainees are well-equipped to teach pupils with special needs and disabilities. This is a condition of grant funding only and the ITT criteria requirements on ITAP remain unchanged.

The department continues to monitor the effectiveness of all the ITT quality requirements but has no current plans to amend ITAP requirements for courses beginning in September 2027.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
10th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether Ofsted’s initial teacher education inspection framework takes account of the effectiveness of a provider’s academic appointment processes and research integrity arrangements; and if not, whether they will ask Ofsted to consider doing so.

Ofsted’s initial teacher education inspection framework provides an independent evaluation of the effectiveness of initial teacher education providers. Inspections consider the quality of education and training, leadership, governance and compliance with the department’s initial teacher training criteria.

The framework does not specifically assess a provider’s processes for appointing academic staff or its research integrity arrangements and there are no plans to change this. Universities are autonomous institutions and are responsible for their own staffing and research governance arrangements, subject to the relevant legal and regulatory requirements.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what powers the Department for Education has to suspend, make conditional, or withdraw the accreditation of an initial teacher training provider; and on how many occasions each power has been exercised since September 2024.

To ensure initial teacher training is consistently high-quality, the department regulates the initial teacher training (ITT) market by accrediting ITT providers to deliver courses leading to qualified teacher status and the setting of ITT criteria, which all accredited providers should follow as a condition of their accreditation.

Ofsted independently inspects the quality of ITT provision and compliance with the ITT criteria. Where an inspection identifies that a provider is not meeting the expected standard in all evaluation areas, Ofsted will re-inspect within 12 months.

The Secretary of State for Education may withdraw the accreditation of an ITT provider where the provider no longer meets the requirements of accreditation. The circumstances that may lead to withdrawal are outlined in the ITT criteria and include non-compliance with one or more of the specified criteria, or failure to achieve the expected standard in Ofsted re-inspection.

The department has not withdrawn accreditation from any ITT provider since September 2024.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Department for Education has been in contact with the University of Cambridge since 1 July 2026 concerning the Faculty of Education’s status as an accredited initial teacher training provider; and whether they intend to publish the correspondence.

The department has not been in contact with the University of Cambridge since 1 July 2026 regarding its status as an accredited initial teacher training provider.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Office for Students has opened, or intends to open, regulatory engagement with the University of Cambridge under its conditions of registration relating to governance, management, and accountability in connection with its Faculty of Education.

The University of Cambridge is an autonomous institution that is rightly establishing an independent investigation. The university published further details about this on 4 September, which are available at their website.

It is not for the government to dictate the terms of the university’s investigation. My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education, and I have both met with the vice chancellor of the university and other senior leaders to seek assurance that their investigation will be rigorous and conducted with urgency.

The Office for Students (OfS) is the independent regulator of higher education in England. The OfS has an independent board, which makes its own decisions about how to use its regulatory powers, including when and how to engage with registered providers regarding their compliance with the conditions of registration. The statutory basis for the OfS’ regulatory powers is set out in the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.

The department awaits the outcomes of the investigation, and I understand that the OfS currently has no plans to open regulatory action on this issue.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to require the independent investigation announced by the University of Cambridge on 12 August into appointments in its Faculty of Education to publish its findings in full.

The University of Cambridge is an autonomous institution that is rightly establishing an independent investigation. The university published further details about this on 4 September, which are available at their website.

It is not for the government to dictate the terms of the university’s investigation. My right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education, and I have both met with the vice chancellor of the university and other senior leaders to seek assurance that their investigation will be rigorous and conducted with urgency.

The Office for Students (OfS) is the independent regulator of higher education in England. The OfS has an independent board, which makes its own decisions about how to use its regulatory powers, including when and how to engage with registered providers regarding their compliance with the conditions of registration. The statutory basis for the OfS’ regulatory powers is set out in the Higher Education and Research Act 2017.

The department awaits the outcomes of the investigation, and I understand that the OfS currently has no plans to open regulatory action on this issue.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the devolved appointment processes described by the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge in her statement on 12 August 2026 are consistent with the accountability expected of an accredited initial teacher training provider.

The Secretary of State for Education sets the initial teacher training (ITT) criteria, which accredited providers must meet to deliver ITT that leads to qualified teacher status. These criteria include the requirements for high-quality training, including the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF), which draws on the best available evidence to set out the knowledge, skills and behaviours that define great teaching.

Accredited ITT providers are accountable for ensuring that their provision is compliant with the ITT criteria, including governance criteria to ensure management structures facilitate the effective operation of high-quality ITT programmes. Ofsted independently inspects all accredited ITT providers to assure the quality of ITT provision and compliance with the ITT criteria.

As autonomous institutions, universities are responsible for their own staffing decisions. The department does not prescribe individual providers’ internal appointment processes, arrangements for verifying academic qualifications or research integrity arrangements, and does not have plans to do so.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
8th Sep 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government whether the initial teacher training criteria and supporting advice for 2026–27 contain any requirement relating to (1) the verification of academic qualifications and employment history of staff delivering accredited courses, (2) research integrity, or (3) the governance of the academic unit delivering the course; and if not, whether they plan to introduce such requirements.

The Secretary of State for Education sets the initial teacher training (ITT) criteria, which accredited providers must meet to deliver ITT that leads to qualified teacher status. These criteria include the requirements for high-quality training, including the Initial Teacher Training and Early Career Framework (ITTECF), which draws on the best available evidence to set out the knowledge, skills and behaviours that define great teaching.

Accredited ITT providers are accountable for ensuring that their provision is compliant with the ITT criteria, including governance criteria to ensure management structures facilitate the effective operation of high-quality ITT programmes. Ofsted independently inspects all accredited ITT providers to assure the quality of ITT provision and compliance with the ITT criteria.

As autonomous institutions, universities are responsible for their own staffing decisions. The department does not prescribe individual providers’ internal appointment processes, arrangements for verifying academic qualifications or research integrity arrangements, and does not have plans to do so.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
13th Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government how state-funded schools (1) choose, (2) authorise, and (3) fund, books to be made available in school libraries.

Within the framework of the National Curriculum, schools make their own choices about which specific books or other resources they use. Headteachers have autonomy to decide how best to spend the core schools funding that is allocated to them by the department. We encourage schools to promote reading for pleasure and trust the judgements of schools and teachers in their choice of books.

It is for individual schools to decide how best to provide and maintain a library service for their pupils.

​The government’s reading framework also offers non-statutory guidance for teachers and school leaders, including on how to organise their school library, book corner or book stock to make reading accessible and attractive to readers.

This government has committed £12.5 million to provide a library in every primary school in England by the end of this Parliament, alongside £5 million for secondary schools to purchase books and reading material to support reading for pleasure.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)
13th Jul 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government how many diversity, equity and inclusion roles there are in state-funded schools; and what is the cost of those roles.

The department does not collect data on the number of diversity, equity and inclusion roles in state-funded schools, or the costs associated with such role. While the school workforce census collects data on broad staff categories, it does not capture information on specific functions or responsibilities undertaken by individual employees.

Baroness Smith of Malvern
Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)