Information between 10th March 2025 - 20th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 232 Noes - 141 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 43 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 135 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 271 Noes - 179 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 54 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 177 |
|
18 Mar 2025 - Non-Domestic Rating (Multipliers and Private Schools) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 255 Noes - 165 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 47 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 237 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 229 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 44 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 207 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 50 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 74 Noes - 339 |
|
17 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 234 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 52 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 234 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 203 Noes - 257 |
|
11 Mar 2025 - Football Governance Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 55 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 224 Noes - 267 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Company Accounts
Asked by: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the discrepancy between the Financial Reporting Council's Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks), published on 25 February, and section 393 of the Companies Act 2006, where the former requires that "the financial statements give a true and fair view" while the latter addresses specific numbers being "a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss". Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Financial Reporting Council (FPR) 'Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks)' (the guidance) is non-mandatory and non-statutory guidance issued by the FRC to support its public interest outcomes. The guidance was not developed to address matters relating to distributable profits. Section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 is referenced in the guidance as one of the relevant requirements. Accounting standards set the threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting. As noted in paragraph 3.3 of the guidance, there are often realistic alternatives to liquidation or cessation of operations. |
|
Company Accounts
Asked by: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government why the Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks), published on 25 February, does not mention that using the going concern basis of accounting is relevant under Part 23 of the Companies Act 2006 in considering whether or not a distribution is lawful. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Financial Reporting Council (FPR) 'Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks)' (the guidance) is non-mandatory and non-statutory guidance issued by the FRC to support its public interest outcomes. The guidance was not developed to address matters relating to distributable profits. Section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 is referenced in the guidance as one of the relevant requirements. Accounting standards set the threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting. As noted in paragraph 3.3 of the guidance, there are often realistic alternatives to liquidation or cessation of operations. |
|
Company Accounts
Asked by: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government why the Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks), published on 25 February, does not mention that section 836 of the Companies Act 2006 requires the numbers in the "relevant accounts" to establish whether or not a distribution is lawful. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Financial Reporting Council (FPR) 'Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks)' (the guidance) is non-mandatory and non-statutory guidance issued by the FRC to support its public interest outcomes. The guidance was not developed to address matters relating to distributable profits. Section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 is referenced in the guidance as one of the relevant requirements. Accounting standards set the threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting. As noted in paragraph 3.3 of the guidance, there are often realistic alternatives to liquidation or cessation of operations. |
|
Accountancy
Asked by: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the authority for the statement in paragraph 3.3 of the Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks), published on 25 February, that the "threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting is very high". Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Financial Reporting Council (FPR) 'Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks)' (the guidance) is non-mandatory and non-statutory guidance issued by the FRC to support its public interest outcomes. The guidance was not developed to address matters relating to distributable profits. Section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 is referenced in the guidance as one of the relevant requirements. Accounting standards set the threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting. As noted in paragraph 3.3 of the guidance, there are often realistic alternatives to liquidation or cessation of operations. |
|
Accountancy
Asked by: Baroness Bowles of Berkhamsted (Liberal Democrat - Life peer) Monday 10th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government what legal advice, if any, the Financial Reporting Council took in producing Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks), published on 25 February; and, if so, which entity gave them such advice. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Financial Reporting Council (FPR) 'Guidance on the Going Concern Basis of Accounting and Related Reporting (including Solvency and Liquidity Risks)' (the guidance) is non-mandatory and non-statutory guidance issued by the FRC to support its public interest outcomes. The guidance was not developed to address matters relating to distributable profits. Section 393 of the Companies Act 2006 is referenced in the guidance as one of the relevant requirements. Accounting standards set the threshold for departing from the going concern basis of accounting. As noted in paragraph 3.3 of the guidance, there are often realistic alternatives to liquidation or cessation of operations. |
| Bill Documents |
|---|
|
Mar. 17 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 17 March 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD DE CLIFFORD BARONESS BOWLES OF BERKHAMSTED _ Schedule 1, page 187, line 4, at end insert— “New |
|
Mar. 14 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments - 14 March 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD DE CLIFFORD BARONESS BOWLES OF BERKHAMSTED _ Schedule 1, page 187, line 4, at end insert— “New |
|
Mar. 12 2025
HL Bill 60 Running list of amendments – 12 March 2025 Renters' Rights Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: LORD DE CLIFFORD BARONESS BOWLES OF BERKHAMSTED ★_ Schedule 1, page 187, line 4, at end insert— “New |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 2nd April 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 26th March 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 23rd April 2025 10 a.m. Financial Services Regulation Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |