All 1 Debates between Baroness Boothroyd and Lord Thomas of Gresford

House of Lords: Reform

Debate between Baroness Boothroyd and Lord Thomas of Gresford
Tuesday 21st June 2011

(12 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Thomas of Gresford Portrait Lord Thomas of Gresford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Of course. She is a highly popular Member of this House and a highly respected person. Yet it is easy and populist to attack politicians. It is almost as easy as attacking lawyers. If Cross-Benchers want to serve the people, they can knock on doors with the rest of us. As the noble Lord, Lord Cormack, has said, the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd, did so with success—far more success than I had in the past.

Baroness Boothroyd Portrait Baroness Boothroyd
- Hansard - -

I fought six elections before being elected and 14 after being elected.

Lord Thomas of Gresford Portrait Lord Thomas of Gresford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is fantastic. I fought eight elections and lost the lot.

Baroness Boothroyd Portrait Baroness Boothroyd
- Hansard - -

Serves you jolly well right.

Lord Thomas of Gresford Portrait Lord Thomas of Gresford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I was gaining expertise in another field at the time. An expertise is a fine thing but everyone on the Cross Benches who has retired from their field of endeavour will recognise that expertise has a limited shelf life and is overtaken by developments and changes. Contemporary expertise should be delivered to Parliament, as it is in congressional committees in the United States, and severely tried and tested under questioning. That is why I support a 100 per cent elected second Chamber of a limited number of senators. I used to walk through the Lobbies with Lord Williams of Mostyn, he and I having similar backgrounds, in support of a 100 per cent elected second Chamber. I agree that Members should serve for one term of 15 years, which would give them independence, but I would include in the Bill a right of recall, which would enable an electorate to sack a Member and hold him accountable for the trust that the public had put in him. I look forward to the findings of the committee next year.