Information between 2nd March 2026 - 12th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Statement - Main Chamber Subject: Security Update (dinner break business around 6pm) View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 161 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 181 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 145 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 129 Noes - 132 |
|
4 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 146 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 143 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 208 Noes - 142 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 198 Noes - 139 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 194 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Mar 2026 - National Insurance Contributions (Employer Pensions Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 202 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 137 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 143 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 140 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 155 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 178 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 121 Noes - 145 |
|
2 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 71 Noes - 177 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 158 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 160 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 154 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 183 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 139 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 185 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 82 Noes - 151 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 117 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 40 Noes - 123 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180 |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
11 Mar 2026, 2:29 p.m. - House of Commons "Baroness Anderson, of Stoke on Trent in the other House, to support this work on standards and constitutional reform as a new " Rt Hon Darren Jones MP, Minister of State (Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister) (Bristol North West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
11 Mar 2026, 4:05 p.m. - House of Lords "motions in the name of Baroness Anderson of Stoke on Trent be agreed to. En bloc, as many of that " Business of the House - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion
59 speeches (8,120 words) Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Commons Chamber Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Darren Jones (Lab - Bristol North West) We have appointed Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent in the upper House to support this work on standards - Link to Speech |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Lord Mandelson
Asked by: Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 11th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 27 January (HL13589), what was the rationale for removing the former Duke of York from the Roll of the Peerage and not Lord Mandelson. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was removed from the Roll of the Peerage on 5 November 2025 and his title is no longer used officially. The Government supports this decision taken by His Majesty The King.
The Prime Minister has been clear that Peter Mandelson should not be a member of the House of Lords or use the title. Bespoke legislation is currently required to remove a peerage but the Prime Minister has announced that the Government will create a mechanism to remove peerages from disgraced peers; this work is continuing.
|
|
Civil Servants: Media and Public Speaking
Asked by: Baroness Finn (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 10th March 2026 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 3 February (HL13976), and with reference to paragraph 223 of the Cabinet Office Guide to Parliamentary Work and paragraph 1.6(d) of the Ministerial Code, what is the reason why current policy development prevents the publication of the previous guidance to the Civil Service about speaking to the media. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) This guidance is currently under development in a live policy area. Premature release of this information would inhibit the free and frank provision of advice for policy development.
|
| Non-Departmental Publications - News and Communications |
|---|
|
Mar. 03 2026
Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street Source Page: Appointments: 3 March 2026 Document: Appointments: 3 March 2026 (webpage) News and Communications Found: Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent as Parliamentary Secretary in the Cabinet Office. |
| Deposited Papers |
|---|
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Cabinet Office Source Page: Letter dated 26/02/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Falkner of Margravine regarding a question on the registration of Community Interest Companies (CICs) at Companies House, raised during an oral question on think tanks funding. 1p. Document: BA_to_Baroness_Falkner_re_Funding_of_Think_Tanks_OQ.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 26/02/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Falkner of Margravine regarding |
|
Wednesday 4th March 2026
Cabinet Office Source Page: Letter dated 27/02/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Pickles regarding the management of outside roles undertaken by former senior ministers and officials after leaving office, as discussed during the Oral Question on Public Trust in National Politics. 1p. Document: BA_to_Lord_Pickles.pdf (PDF) Found: Letter dated 27/02/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Pickles regarding the management |