Information between 3rd November 2025 - 23rd November 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 4th November 2025 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Select Committee Statement - Main Chamber Subject: Update on the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 5th November 2025 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Urgent Question Repeat - Main Chamber Subject: The verdict in the trial of "Soldier F" View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 18th November 2025 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Statement - Main Chamber Subject: China Espionage and Government Security Response View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 8th December 2025 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Orders and regulations - Grand Committee Subject: Procurement Act 2023 (Specified International Trade Agreements) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Monday 8th December 2025 Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Orders and regulations - Grand Committee Subject: Infrastructure (Wales) Act 2024 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2025 Infrastructure (Wales) Act 2024 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2025 View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Thursday 11th December 2025 Cabinet Office Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Labour - Life peer) Orders and regulations - Main Chamber Subject: Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2025 Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2025 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 128 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 169 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 88 Labour No votes vs 14 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 47 Noes - 136 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 130 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 140 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 129 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 151 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 200 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 120 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 159 Noes - 194 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 161 Noes - 144 |
|
5 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 64 Noes - 116 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 146 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 227 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 178 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 123 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 58 Noes - 125 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 102 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 36 Noes - 102 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 72 Noes - 147 |
|
3 Nov 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 107 Noes - 136 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 152 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 169 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 238 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 151 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 66 Noes - 175 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 240 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 147 Labour No votes vs 3 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 195 |
|
11 Nov 2025 - Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 153 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 193 Noes - 236 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 135 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 141 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 157 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 295 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 309 Noes - 150 |
|
17 Nov 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 147 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 1 speech (28 words) Committee stage Friday 14th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 5 speeches (1,308 words) Consideration of Commons amendments and / or reasons Tuesday 11th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions |
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Office for National Statistics
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 13 speeches (1,012 words) Monday 10th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: “Soldier F” Trial Verdict
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 9 speeches (838 words) Wednesday 5th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
|
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent speeches from: Infected Blood Compensation Scheme
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent contributed 4 speeches (2,198 words) Tuesday 4th November 2025 - Lords Chamber Northern Ireland Office |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Thursday 13th November 2025
Correspondence - 13 November 2025, Letter to the Rt Hon Nick Thomas-Symonds MP re: Youth Experience Scheme European Affairs Committee Found: Youth Mobility Scheme in the House on 29 October 2025, your Ministerial colleague, Baroness Anderson of Stoke on Trent |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Baroness Shafik
Asked by: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 5th November 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 21 October (HL11034), whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of Baroness Shafik’s declaration of interests provided in relation to her role with the Victoria and Albert Museum in accordance the Cabinet Office guidance on direct appointments published May 2022; and what specific management or mitigation measures have been agreed with the Museum or the Department for Culture, Media and Sport in relation to those declared interests. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) In line with the longstanding approach over multiple administrations, it is not appropriate to publish confidential declaration of interests documentation. As the Noble Lord will be aware, the process for declaring and managing any outside interests in relation to this role has been conducted robustly and in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies and other government guidance. There are mitigations in place to manage any potential issues. |
|
Baroness Shafik
Asked by: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Conservative - Life peer) Tuesday 4th November 2025 Question to the Cabinet Office: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 21 October (HL11034), whether they will place in the Library of the House a copy of Baroness Shafik’s declaration of interests provided to the Cabinet Office as a direct ministerial appointment in accordance the Cabinet Office guidance on direct appointments published May 2022; and what specific management or mitigation measures have been agreed with Cabinet Office in relation to those declared interests. Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) In line with the longstanding approach over multiple administrations, it is not appropriate to publish confidential declaration of interests documentation. As the Noble Lord will be aware, the process for declaring and managing any outside interests in relation to this role has been conducted robustly and in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Board Members of Public Bodies and other government guidance. There are mitigations in place to manage any potential issues. |