Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent

Information between 10th April 2026 - 20th April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 86 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 27 Noes - 89
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 114 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 30 Noes - 130
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 114 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 46 Noes - 117
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 141 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 55
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 231
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 332
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 157 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 180
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 154 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 247 Noes - 187
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 65 Noes - 173
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
13 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 146 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 156
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 169 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 200
15 Apr 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 165 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 260
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 142 Noes - 192
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 130 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 144
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 127 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 141
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 133 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 192 Noes - 142
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 154
16 Apr 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 117 Labour No votes vs 2 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 121



Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent mentioned

Calendar
Tuesday 21st April 2026 9:30 a.m.
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee - Oral evidence
Subject: Propriety, ethics and the wider standards landscape in the UK
At 10:00am: Oral evidence
The Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (Government Whip) and Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office
Ellen Atkinson - Interim Director General for the Propriety, Ethics & Constitution Group
Simon Madden - Director of Propriety and Ethics
View calendar - Add to calendar


Written Answers
Senior Civil Servants: Performance Appraisal
Asked by: Baroness Shawcross-Wolfson (Conservative - Life peer)
Friday 17th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 February (HL14387), whether the central performance management framework for the Senior Civil Service has been, or will be, changed in order to deliver the plans set out by the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister in his speech on 20 January.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

We are in the process of updating the Senior Civil Service (SCS) Performance Management Framework aimed at ensuring performance across the SCS is focused on the Prime Minister’s priorities and that underperformance is held to tougher standards and addressed as soon as it arises.

Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013
Asked by: Lord Gilbert of Panteg (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 16 December 2025 (HL12742), whether the Cabinet Office holds information on the current cash equivalent transfer value of the pension scheme established under the Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Information about this Pension Scheme, including a calculation of the cash equivalent transfer value, was included in the Crown Prosecution Service's annual report and accounts for 2013-14. There has been no change to the policy under the last Administration not to publish information about civil servants' individual pensions apart from in the remuneration reports contained in departmental annual reports and accounts.

Cabinet Office: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Thursday 16th April 2026

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Cabinet Office has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Cabinet Office conducts regular reviews to prioritise the commencement of legislation as soon as is reasonably practicable to do so, and taking into account departmental objectives.

The Cabinet Office has made two Commencement Orders in the past year to bring legislation within its remit into force as appropriate.

Department for Energy Security and Net Zero: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Lord Whitehead - Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)

Policy teams within the department are responsible for ensuring effective legislative practice within their area, including uncommenced legislation and considering when to bring forward commencement orders. Where needed, they draw on advice of legal professionals and our central legislative functions to support their delivery.

Department for Science, Innovation and Technology: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology keeps the commencement and implementation of its legislation under review alongside operational readiness and delivery of wider priorities. This work is undertaken alongside established post‑legislative scrutiny processes.

Department for Business and Trade: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Tuesday 14th April 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Department for Business and Trade has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Every year we are in contact with Parliament and the relevant Select Committee’s to undertake required post-legislative scrutiny of relevant legislation. Any post-legislative scrutiny will include a review of the operation of the legislation, and highlight any measures not commenced and plans to commence them.

The department will, as part of its usual process, continue to periodically review legislation within its area of policy development.

Department for Education: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Department for Education has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Smith of Malvern - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions)

In the past year, we have committed in Parliament to undertake the required post-legislative scrutiny of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill. This will include considering the coming into force of measures, where not yet commenced.

The department will, as part of its usual process, continue to periodically review legislation within its area of responsibility as part of policy development.

Ministry of Justice: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Ministry of Justice has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Levitt - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

Relevant teams keep the commencement and implementation of past Acts under review in light of operational readiness, wider priorities and with consideration to developments across the justice system.

This is conducted alongside established post legislative scrutiny processes where appropriate.

Easter Act 1928
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), which department is responsible for considering commencing the Easter Act 1928; when it last carried out a review; and what the outcome was.

Answered by Baroness Lloyd of Effra - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Department for Business and Trade is responsible for decisions on whether to commence the Easter Act 1928.

The Department keeps this matter under review and – as part of this – considers whether the Christian churches agree on moving Easter to a fixed date.

The Government does not currently have any plans to commence the Easter Act 1928.

Treasury: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps HM Treasury has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Treasury keeps legislation under review considering operational readiness, Cabinet Office guidance and wider priorities. Policy teams monitor provisions that have not been commenced and consider when to bring forward commencement orders, drawing on legal and legislative advice where needed. The department remains in regular contact with Parliament to undertake required post-legislative scrutiny, including consideration of measures not yet commenced.

Department for Culture, Media and Sport: Legislation
Asked by: Lord Pack (Liberal Democrat - Life peer)
Monday 13th April 2026

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 24 March (HL15443), what steps the Department for Culture, Media and Sport has taken in the last year to meet its legal duty to keep under review the question of when uncommenced legislation that falls within its area of responsibility should be brought into force.

Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Relevant policy teams keep the commencement and implementation of Acts of Parliament under review in light of operational readiness and wider priorities.

This is conducted alongside established post legislative scrutiny processes where appropriate.



Deposited Papers
Thursday 16th April 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Letter dated 09/04/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Empey regarding the debate on the Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee's report 'Northern Ireland after Brexit': review of the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement. 2p.
Document: Letter_from_Baroness_Anderson_to_Lord_Empey.docx.pdf (PDF)

Found: Letter dated 09/04/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Lord Empey regarding the debate on

Wednesday 15th April 2026
Cabinet Office
Source Page: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft Procurement (Amendment) Regulations 2026 debate: guidance and support to contracting authorities in respect of data standards and reporting formats. 2p.
Document: 2026-03-31_-_B_Anderson_to_B_Finn_re_Procurement_Regulations_2026.pdf (PDF)

Found: Letter dated 31/03/2026 from Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent to Baroness Finn regarding the draft