Petitions

Monday 24th February 2025

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
Monday 24 February 2025

County Council elections in West Sussex

Monday 24th February 2025

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares that the County Council elections meant to take place in May 2025 should not be postponed indefinitely.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to ensure that the County Council Elections in West Sussex take place in May 2025.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Jess Brown-Fuller, Official Report, 23 January 2025; Vol. 760, c. 1205.]
[P003036]
Observations from The Minister for Local Government and English Devolution (Jim McMahon):
The “English Devolution White Paper” sets out how the Government plan to deliver on our manifesto pledge to transfer power out of Westminster through devolution and to fix the foundations of local government. The Government’s long-term vision is for simpler structures which make it much clearer for residents whom they should look to on local issues, with more strategic decisions to unlock growth and deliver better services for communities. Devolution over a large strategic geography, alongside local government reorganisation, can drive economic growth while delivering optimal public services and beginning to fix the foundations of local government.
On 16 December 2024, I wrote to all councils in two-tier areas of England setting out the Government’s plans for a joint programme of devolution and local government reorganisation. The letter can be accessed online at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/local-government-reorganisation-letter-to-two-tier-areas.
In that letter, I set out that I had heard from some areas that the timing of elections affects their planning for devolution, particularly alongside reorganisation. I set out that, to help manage these demands, I would consider requests made by 10 January to delay elections. The list of councils that made requests that involve postponing their election from 2025 to 2026 is published at the same webpage as my letter. I also set out that these requests would only be considered where it is clear that postponement will help the area to deliver both reorganisation and devolution to the most ambitious timeframe. This is rightly a high bar to reach, and the Government’s starting point is for elections to go ahead unless there is strong justification.
West Sussex county council submitted, on 10 January, a request to postpone its election. This request was carefully considered against the criteria I have described above, and on 5 February the Deputy Prime Minister announced our decision to agree requests from nine councils to postpone their May 2025 election to May 2026 only. This included West Sussex. Postponement is essential for the delivery of the devolution priority programme and complementary reorganisation. In the areas where elections are postponed, plans for delivering new combined county authorities, inaugural mayoral elections, and local government reorganisation will all be concurrent and working to a very ambitious timetable.
There is well-established precedent for postponing elections, including in the cases of the North Yorkshire, Cumbria and Somerset elections, and the Buckinghamshire and Northamptonshire district council elections, under the previous Government, when reorganisation happened in those areas. Between 2019 and 2022, the Government legislated to postpone 17 local council elections during preparatory local government reorganisation work.
I look forward to working with local leaders in West Sussex on delivering devolution and reform to local government.

Free 1-hour parking in Yarm

Monday 24th February 2025

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of the residents of the constituency of Stockton West,
Declares that Stockton Council must keep Yarm’s free 1-hour parking; further declares that free parking is crucial for supporting local businesses, encouraging footfall, and helping Yarm's economy thrive; and further notes that the Council's changes to eliminate 1-hour free parking risks harming small businesses and deterring shoppers.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take immediate action to ensure that the high street in Yarm is supported with free 1-hour parking.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Matt Vickers, Official Report, 30 January 2025; Vol. 761, c. 523.]
[P003040]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood):
Responsibility for traffic management on local roads rests with the relevant local authority, as they are best placed to consider how local needs can be effectively met. It is therefore a matter for individual authorities to decide on the nature and scope of parking policies and to balance the needs of residents, emergency services, local businesses and those who work in and visit the areas.
The objective of local parking policies is not to raise revenue. Section 55 of the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984 requires any surplus raised from parking schemes to be directed to local authority funded transport or environmental schemes.
Statutory guidance recommends a local authority sets its parking charges as part of meeting its wider parking strategy to meet its network management duty under section 16 of the Traffic Management Act 2004. It also says that parking policies should be proportionate, support town centre prosperity and reconcile competing demands for kerb space.
Private car park owners are free to set their own parking terms and conditions.
Responsibility for setting parking charges on local roads rests with the local authorities who are best placed to balance the needs of residents, emergency services, local business and those who work in and visit the area.
The Minister believes that setting on-street parking charges should remain the responsibility of local authorities in accordance with powers available in the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and with their various statutory duties. As well as the level of charges, authorities can also decide how charges are applied, for example differential charges for certain classes of vehicles such as those with diesel engines. Local authorities may also choose to offer preferential rates to zero emission vehicles that, in addition to being cheaper for drivers, benefit the community by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, air pollution, and noise pollution for cleaner, healthier, and quieter streets. The decisions by authorities should reflect the objectives of their local transport plans.
The Secretary of State’s statutory guidance to local authorities on the civil enforcement of parking contraventions advocates that parking charges should be proportionate and should not be set at unreasonable levels. It also recommends local authorities review their parking policies regularly, including parking charges, to ensure that they remain fit for purpose. The public and the police should be consulted as part of the appraisal process.

Family farm tax

Monday 24th February 2025

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Northern Ireland,
Declares that the government should uphold the Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief on inheritance tax on farms; notes the petition by the Ulster Farmers’ Union on this topic with over 15,000 signatures; and further notes the disparity between the DEFRA and DAERA statistics on the number of Northern Ireland farms impacted by this change.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government take immediate action to stop the removal of the Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief on inheritance tax on farms.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Robin Swann, Official Report, 28 January 2025; Vol. 761, c. 274.]
[P003037]
Observations from the Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (James Murray):
The Government thank the hon. Member for South Antrim (Robin Swann MP) for submitting the petition on behalf of residents of Northern Ireland regarding the reforms to agricultural property relief and business property relief announced at autumn Budget 2024.
The Government’s commitment to farmers and the vital role they play in feeding our nation remains steadfast. The Government recognise the concerns raised by the farming community, including those in Northern Ireland, and UK Government Ministers have met with the Ulster Farmers’ Union since the Budget to listen to their concerns. The Government are aware of the strength of feeling in Northern Ireland and elsewhere.
It is important to understand why this decision was taken, and what it means in practice. This decision was not taken lightly and, despite a tough fiscal context and contrary to the suggestion in the petition that the reliefs are being removed, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others.
At autumn Budget 2024, the Government took a number of difficult but necessary decisions on tax, welfare, and spending to restore economic stability, fix the public finances, and support public services. These were tough decisions given the situation we inherited from the previous administration, but the Government have done so in a way that makes the tax system fairer and more sustainable.
In 2021-22—the most recent year for which data is available—the median value of assets qualifying for agricultural property relief was £486,000 and three-quarters of estates claimed for agricultural property below £1 million. The data also shows that a very small number of claimants each year claim a very significant amount of relief— 40% of the total Exchequer cost of the relief went to the top 7% of claims. It is not fair to maintain such a significant relief for a very small number of claimants, when this money could better be used to fund our public services. This data is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agricultural-property-relief-and-business-property-relief-reforms
The general inheritance tax rules remain unchanged. If an individual’s estate goes to their surviving spouse or civil partner, it is completely exempt from inheritance tax. When an estate goes to anyone else, there is a £325,000 nil-rate band, which increases to £500,000 where a qualifying residence is left on death to a direct descendant, such as a child. Any unused nil-rate bands are transferred to a surviving spouse or civil partner, which means the qualifying estate of a surviving spouse or civil partner can pass on up to £1 million to a direct descendant without any inheritance tax liability when they pass away.
Agricultural property relief and business property relief are in addition to these general allowances. The reforms announced at autumn Budget 2024, which apply from 6 April 2026, mean the first £1 million of combined agricultural and business assets will not result in any inheritance tax. Above the £1 million allowance, individuals will access 50% relief from inheritance tax and will pay inheritance tax at a reduced effective rate up to 20%, rather than the standard 40%. These tax reliefs can be combined with the general allowances mentioned above, and this means a couple could pass on up to £3 million tax-free between them.
Furthermore, any gifts of assets made more than seven years before death are fully excluded from inheritance tax. Taper relief can also apply in certain circumstances, which reduces the tax payable on gifts made within seven years of death. Where inheritance tax is due, those liable for a charge can in most circumstances pay any liability on the relevant assets over 10 annual instalments, interest-free.
The reforms are expected to result in up to 520 estates across the UK claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim business property relief, paying more inheritance tax in 2026-27. This means almost three-quarters of estates claiming agricultural property relief, including those that also claim for business property relief, would not pay any more tax as a result of the changes in 2026-27, based on the latest available data. More detail on the Government’s estimates are available in a letter from the Chancellor of the Exchequer to the Chair of the Treasury Select Committee in November 2024, which is available at https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/45691/documents/226235/default/
The Government are aware of the analysis undertaken by the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs in relation to the potential impacts in Northern Ireland of the reforms to these reliefs. However, the Government remain firmly of the view that claims data is the correct way to understand an inheritance tax liability. The Government’s analysis of the number of estates across the UK expected to be affected by reforms is underpinned by that data. The Government were also asked recently to respond to several questions from the Northern Ireland Select Committee about these reforms, including in relation to DAERA’s analysis. The response to the Committee can be found at https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/46267/documents/232537/default/
In summary, the Government understand the concerns raised in the petition, but believe our approach gets the balance right between supporting farms and fixing the public finances in a fair way. The reforms reduce the inheritance tax advantages available to owners of agricultural and business assets, but still mean those assets will be taxed at a much lower effective rate than most other assets. Despite a tough fiscal context, the Government will maintain very significant levels of relief from inheritance tax beyond what is available to others and compared with the position before 1992.