Defence

(Limited Text - Ministerial Extracts only)

Read Full debate
Tuesday 24th April 2018

(6 years, 8 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Hansard Text
Nia Griffith Portrait Nia Griffith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Secretary of State for that answer. Taking that as a yes, how is it that more than half a million pounds of LIBOR funds has been spent by the MOD in support of armed forces welfare, when the Under-Secretary of State for Defence, the right hon. Member for Bournemouth East (Mr Ellwood)—the Minister for Defence people—has said categorically that

“LIBOR funding should not be used to fund Departmental core responsibilities”?

Is it not time for the Secretary of State to admit that it was a serious misjudgment to use LIBOR funds in such a scandalous way? When will his Department be paying back that money?

Gavin Williamson Portrait Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure the hon. Lady is very well aware that the Ministry of Defence does not actually administer LIBOR funding—that is the Treasury. So much of the LIBOR funding has made such a difference, not just to those who have ceased to serve in our armed forces but to those who continue to serve. We are very grateful for the positive impact of that funding on so many of our services.

[Official Report, 23 April 2018, Vol. 639, c. 601.]

Letter of correction from Gavin Williamson:

An error has been identified in the response I gave to the hon. Member for Llanelli (Nia Griffith).

The correct response should have been:

Gavin Williamson Portrait Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am sure the hon. Lady is very well aware that the Ministry of Defence does not actually commit LIBOR funding—that is the Treasury. So much of the LIBOR funding has made such a difference, not just to those who have ceased to serve in our armed forces but to those who continue to serve. We are very grateful for the positive impact of that funding on so many of our services.

The following is an extract from Questions to the Secretary of State for Defence on 23 April 2018.

Andrea Jenkyns Portrait Andrea Jenkyns (Morley and Outwood) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Following on from what has been said earlier about the cadet force, does the Minister agree that the cadets are a great introduction to military life, because as well as giving children positive role models, they help to promote social mobility? Will he update the House on what steps the Department is taking to encourage the participation of state schools in the cadet movement?

Gavin Williamson Portrait Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What our cadets do is extraordinary, right across the country, and we have had a roll-out of 500 new cadet units this year. This is about the ability to promote social mobility and giving youngsters an opportunity to really succeed in life—that is what our armed forces do. The cadet units are a brilliant way of giving young people the opportunity to get a taste of military life and they provide those role models. The question we need to be asking is: can we be doing more to inspire young people in our schools? I think the answer to that is a most certain yes.

[Official Report, 23 April 2018, Vol. 639, c. 603.]

Letter of correction from Gavin Williamson:

An error has been identified in the response I gave to my hon. Friend the Member for Morley and Outwood (Andrea Jenkyns).

The correct response should have been:

Gavin Williamson Portrait Gavin Williamson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What our cadets do is extraordinary, right across the country, and we are planning to have a total of 500 cadet units in schools within the next two years. This is about the ability to promote social mobility and giving youngsters an opportunity to really succeed in life—that is what our armed forces do. The cadet units are a brilliant way of giving young people the opportunity to get a taste of military life and they provide those role models. The question we need to be asking is: can we be doing more to inspire young people in our schools? I think the answer to that is a most certain yes.