Written Ministerial Statements

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Monday 28 March 2011

Members' and Peers' Correspondence

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Maude of Horsham Portrait The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General (Mr Francis Maude)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am today publishing a report on Departments’ and agencies’ performance on handling Members’ and peers’ correspondence during the calendar year 2010. Details are set out in the attached table. Correspondence statistics for 2009 can be found on 16 March 2010, Official Report, 47-50WS.

Departmental figures are based on substantive replies unless otherwise indicated.

The footnotes to the table provide general background information on how the figures have been compiled.

Correspondence from MP/ Peers to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives in 2010

Correspondence from MP/ Peers to Ministers and Agency Chief Executives1

2010

Department or Agency

Target set for reply (working days)

Number of letters received

% of replies within target

Attorney-General’s Office

20

150

73

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

15

13243

71

Companies House

10

109

100

Insolvency Service

10

42

64

Cabinet Office

15

3048

582

Charity Commission

10

143

70

Department for Communities and Local Government

15

9117

77

Planning Inspectorate

73

236

85

Crown Prosecution Service

20

460

98

Department for Culture, Media and Sport

20

4006

965

Royal Parks4

10

20

95

Ministry of Defence

15

6072

77

Met Office

10

15

87

Service Personnel and Veterans Agency

15

125

96

Department for Education

15

18512

426

Department of Energy and Climate Change

15

6343

69

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

15

10944

83

Animal Health

15

121

95

Rural Payments Agency

15

552

63

Food Standards Agency

DH Ministers replies

20

1081

83

FSA Chair/CE replies

20

121

83

Meat Hygiene Service7

15

18

100

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

20

9845

90

Government Equalities Office

20

666

80

Department of Health

20

17733

97

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency

20

318

98*

20

38

92**

*Agency Ministerial cases **Letters sent directly to agency chief executive or where agency chief executives responded on behalf of Ministers

Home Office

15

13532

568

Criminal Records Bureau

10

1072

709

Identity and Passport Service

10

1014

87

UK Border Agency

20

57651

88

Department for International Development

15

3163

95

Ministry of Justice

15

4084

78

HM Courts Service

15

939

80

HM Land Registry

15

109

78

National Archives

15

36

92

National Offender Management Service

15

1190

70*

20

348

89**

Office of the Public Guardian

15

191

89

Official Solicitor and Public Trustee

15

43

79

Tribunals Service

15

264

86

*Where Ministers replied ** Where CEO replied

Northern Ireland Office

15

649

78

Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Schools

15

149

88

Office of Fair Trading

15

471

66

Office of Gas and Electricity Markets

15

160

77

Office of the Leader of the House of Commons

15

218

83

Office of the Leader of the House of Lords

15

35

89

Office of Rail Regulation

20

70

84

OFWAT (Water Services Regulation Authority)

10

92

70

Postal Services Commission

5

11

73

Scotland Office

15

88

68

Serious Fraud Office

20

43

83

Department for Transport

15

8359

74

Driver Vehicle Licensing Agency

7

1622

99

Driving Standards Agency

10

158

100

Highways Agency

15

371

93

Maritime and Coastguard Agency

10

21

95

Vehicle and Operator Services Agency

10

86

97

HM Treasury

15

10811

5110

H M Revenue and Customs

15

4028

75

HMRC CEO*

15

729

50

*Cases where the HMRC’s chief executive has replied directly, rather than Ministers

Treasury Solicitor’s Department

10

23

96

Wales Office

15

131

82

Department for Work and Pensions

20

19020

85

Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission

15

3967

99

Debt Management

15

28

86

Health and Safety Executive

15

93

92

Jobcentre Plus

15

3195

94

Pension, Disability and Carers Service

15

2047

100

1 Departments and Agencies which received 10 MPs/Peers letters or fewer are not shown in this table. Holding or interim replies are not included unless otherwise indicated. The report does not include correspondence considered as freedom of information requests. Includes correspondence received from prospective parliamentary candidates.

2 Performance has been affected by a 111% rise in correspondence following the formation of the new Government and machinery of government changes. Measures have been put in place to improve performance in 2011.

3 With effect from 1 July, response target revised to seven working days.

4 Response target reduced to 10 working days with effect from 1 September.

5 From 28 June 2010 performance was monitored on 2537 letters received to departmental targets of two working days (46% achieved) and 10 working days (82%) achieved).

6 DFE received an increase of 20% in correspondence received compared to the previous year (35% increase for May to December compared to the same period in the previous year) contributing to a downturn in performance. The Department is investing in new processes and resources to ensure improvement in 2011. Includes correspondence sent to the former DCSF.

7 The Meat Hygiene Service was dissolved on 31 March.

8 The drop in HO performance is attributed to a number of new policies being developed as well as policy areas being reviewed which resulted in a temporary delay in replies being sent.

9 CRB experienced a 56% increase in correspondence during the fourth quarter of 2010.

10 Includes correspondence received by OGC, NS&I and the Valuation Office. Performance increased in the first six months of the year to average 64%. The Election, Emergency Budget, Autumn Statement and the Spending Review public consultation exercise increased correspondence levels, resulting in a temporary drop in performance. Correspondence levels are expected to remain high but with a departmental focus on improving performance taking place.

Extraordinary Energy Council

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Chris Huhne Portrait The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Chris Huhne)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was unable to attend the Council because of Cabinet business in London. Andy Lebrecht, Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, represented the UK at the Council.

The extraordinary Energy Council began with a report by the Energy Commissioner of the impact of events in north Africa and Japan on the EU’s energy market. Although there had been no significant impact on supplies as a result of events in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, there had been an impact on prices. The EU had 120 days of oil supply. Saudi Arabia and Russia had undertaken to cover any shortfalls in gas and oil supplies. There was general agreement that oil and gas markets were functioning well and that it was important to take a calm approach to reassure the market. The Council concluded that although there was no immediate problem with energy supply, the EU should take measures to increase its ability to deal with problems in the future, in line with the priorities agreed at the European Energy Council on 4 February.

The Commissioner then reported on the situation in Japan; and on the role of nuclear in the energy mix of the EU. He noted the right of member states to decide upon their own energy mix and that nuclear would continue to play a large role in the EU for the foreseeable future. He proposed that member states should work together to develop and approve an EU safety check for nuclear power plants. The UK agreed on the importance of a measured response based on the evidence and on lessons learned from the events in Japan. Most member states supported this position.

The Council concluded that the EU response to the situation in Japan should involve comprehensive risk and safety assessments (“stress tests”) of nuclear power plants in Europe with full involvement of member states in determining how this should be done. EU neighbouring countries should also be involved in the assessment, as well as international bodies such as the G20 and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The EU should maintain high standards of nuclear safety, with a continual process of improvement. The Council agreed that communication with the public on these issues should be open and transparent.

Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Caroline Spelman Portrait The Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Mrs Caroline Spelman)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Today I am publishing the framework document for the new Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) being created on 1 April by the merger of two existing Executive agencies, Animal Health and the Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) which I announced on 29 June 2010.

The new agency will be an Executive agency of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs with the same remit as its predecessor bodies. In addition to its UK role and commercial activities it will help deliver the animal health and welfare strategy (GB) through regulatory and advisory activities and the provision of excellent science.

Copies of the framework have been made available in the Libraries of both Houses and it will also be placed on the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency’s website.

Greater London Authority Transport Grant (2011-12)

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait The Secretary of State for Transport (Mr Philip Hammond)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Following consultation with the Mayor of London, I have today determined the Greater London Authority Transport Grant for 2011-12 at £2,804 million.

This grant is provided by the Government to Transport for London to deliver transport services and investment in the capital, including London Underground.

In line with my 20 October 2010 letter to the Mayor “Spending Review 2010: TfL funding agreement”, £861 million of this grant is designated an investment grant to support delivery of the schemes and milestones, notably upgrade of the tube, set out in annex B of my 20 October letter, and the remaining £1,943 million is a general grant for the purposes of TfL.

Housing Benefit Shared Accommodation Rate

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Steve Webb Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Steve Webb)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend, the Under-Secretary of State, responsible for welfare reform, Lord Freud of Eastry, has made the following statement.

The Government announced in last October’s comprehensive spending review that it would extend the housing benefit shared accommodation rate to people under the age of 35 from 2012. This rate currently applies to people under the age of 25 and reflects the costs of renting non-self-contained accommodation in the private sector where the tenant has exclusive use of a bedroom but shares other facilities such as a bathroom.

We intend to bring forward these changes by three months so that they start to take effect from January 2012.

The local housing allowance reforms, to be introduced from this April, cap the level of payments to a maximum of a four bedroom rate and reduce local housing allowance rates so that they are based on the 30th percentile of rents rather than the median. They also introduce overall caps on the rate of local housing allowance for one, two, three and four-bedroom accommodation. Existing customers will be given up to nine months transitional protection from these reforms starting from the anniversary date of their claim.



By introducing the shared accommodation rate changes slightly earlier, this will bring the timing of the shared accommodation rate change more closely into line with the local housing allowance reforms for existing customers. It will ensure that single people aged 25 to 34 reaching the end of their transitional protection period will experience at that point a single reduction in their housing benefit, rather than two separate reductions.



That is why we have decided to bring forward the shared accommodation rate changes. We will publicise these proposed changes through appropriate channels to make sure that those affected are aware of them in advance.

Equality 2025 (New Chair)

Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Written Statements
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Maria Miller Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Maria Miller)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Equality 2025 is a non-departmental public body of publicly appointed disabled people, which was established in December 2006.

The group offers strategic, confidential advice to Government on issues that affect disabled people. This advice can include participation in the very early stages of policy development, or in-depth examination of existing policy. The group works with Ministers and senior officials across Government.

Rowen Jade chaired Equality 2025 from 1 December 2008 to 2 September 2010, when she sadly passed away. This recruitment exercise took place to find a candidate to continue Rowen’s good work.

The recruitment exercise was carried out in accordance with the Commissioner for Public Appointments’ code of practice. The quality of applicants for the post was exceptionally high. I am pleased to announce the successful candidate and new chair of Equality 2025 from l April 2011 is Dr Rachel Perkins.

Rachel Perkins has been a member of Equality 2025 since 1 April 2010. I am confident she will lead the group forward during an interesting and challenging time.