Tuesday 1st March 2011

(13 years, 8 months ago)

Ministerial Corrections
Read Hansard Text
Feed-in Tariff Review
The following is the answer given by the Minister of State, the hon. Member for Bexhill and Battle (Gregory Barker) relating to a question from the hon. Member for Tiverton and Honiton (Neil Parish) during Energy and Climate Change Question Time on 10 February 2011.
Neil Parish Portrait Neil Parish
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I very much welcome the Minister’s comments on anaerobic digestion, because I think we can get a great deal more of it. Can he assure us that feed-in tariffs will be set at a fair rate? As we push up energy prices to the consumer, we push more people into fuel poverty. When he tapers the tariffs, will he ensure that hospitals and schools get a fair crack of the whip?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes some excellent points. We will endeavour to ensure that we are very fair in the review, and we certainly want to sustain investment in renewables in schools, hospitals and other community projects that fall above the 40 kW review level. We also need to ensure that we get value for money for consumers and that we do not offer what Labour did—an open cheque book approach to the industry.

[Official Report, 10 February 2011, Vol. 523, c. 464.]

Letter of correction from Mr Gregory Barker:

An error has been identified in the oral answer given on 10 February 2011. The answer made reference to community projects that fall above the 40 kW review level. It should have said above the 50 kW level.

The correct answer should have been:

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes some excellent points. We will endeavour to ensure that we are very fair in the review, and we certainly want to sustain investment in renewables in schools, hospitals and other community projects that fall above the 50 kW review level. We also need to ensure that we get value for money for consumers and that we do not offer what Labour did—an open cheque book approach to the industry.