Information since 24 Feb 2025, 11:47 p.m.
Date | Type | Title |
---|---|---|
4th July 2025 2nd reading | ||
27th June 2025 | Bill | Bill 032 2024-25 (as introduced) |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Company Directors (Duties) Bill
7 speeches (539 words) 2nd reading Friday 4th July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade |
Non-disclosure Agreements
56 speeches (13,038 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Westminster Hall Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Martin Wrigley (LD - Newton Abbot) That is why I introduced my Company Directors (Duties) Bill, which will have its Second Reading debate - Link to Speech 2: Martin Wrigley (LD - Newton Abbot) Will he support my better business Bill—the Company Directors (Duties) Bill—which will have its Second - Link to Speech |
Written Answers |
---|
Company Directors (Duties) Bill
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Monday 7th July 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will hold discussions with the hon. Member for Newton Abbot on the Company Directors (Duties) Bill. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member to discuss his Private Member’s Bill (the Company Directors (Duties) Bill) and the Government’s plans to publish a draft Audit Reform and Corporate Governance Bill. |
Corporate Governance: Reform
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Monday 7th July 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will hold discussions with the hon. Member for Newton Abbot on the Corporate Governance Bill. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member to discuss his Private Member’s Bill (the Company Directors (Duties) Bill) and the Government’s plans to publish a draft Audit Reform and Corporate Governance Bill. |
Corporate Governance: Reform
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Friday 20th June 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department plans to consult (a) businesses, (b) trade unions, (c) investors and (d) civil society organisations on the principle of moving from shareholder primacy to stakeholder primacy. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires company directors to have regard in their decision-making to the interests of their employees and to the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment. All large companies must report annually on how their directors have fulfilled this duty. Section 172 enshrines in statute the "enlightened shareholder value" principle, which recognises that the long-term success of a company depends in part on the ongoing consideration of wider stakeholder interests. This contrasts with the "shareholder maximisation" principle underpinning directors' duties in some other jurisdictions, in which directors owe their duty only to shareholders. The Government welcomes suggestions on how to ensure companies consider wider stakeholder interests alongside the needs of stakeholders. I look forward to considering the clauses of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill when available. I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member for Newton Abbot to discuss his Private Member's Bill. |
Companies: Directors
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Friday 20th June 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if his Department will amend section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 to require company directors to balance the duty to promote the success of the company with duties to (a) employees and (b) the environment. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires company directors to have regard in their decision-making to the interests of their employees and to the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment. All large companies must report annually on how their directors have fulfilled this duty. Section 172 enshrines in statute the "enlightened shareholder value" principle, which recognises that the long-term success of a company depends in part on the ongoing consideration of wider stakeholder interests. This contrasts with the "shareholder maximisation" principle underpinning directors' duties in some other jurisdictions, in which directors owe their duty only to shareholders. The Government welcomes suggestions on how to ensure companies consider wider stakeholder interests alongside the needs of stakeholders. I look forward to considering the clauses of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill when available. I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member for Newton Abbot to discuss his Private Member's Bill. |
Companies: Directors
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Friday 20th June 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will meet with (a) the hon. Member for Newton Abbot and (b) members of the business community to discuss expanding the duties of company directors. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires company directors to have regard in their decision-making to the interests of their employees and to the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment. All large companies must report annually on how their directors have fulfilled this duty. Section 172 enshrines in statute the "enlightened shareholder value" principle, which recognises that the long-term success of a company depends in part on the ongoing consideration of wider stakeholder interests. This contrasts with the "shareholder maximisation" principle underpinning directors' duties in some other jurisdictions, in which directors owe their duty only to shareholders. The Government welcomes suggestions on how to ensure companies consider wider stakeholder interests alongside the needs of stakeholders. I look forward to considering the clauses of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill when available. I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member for Newton Abbot to discuss his Private Member's Bill. |
Corporate Governance: Reform
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Friday 20th June 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether he plans to support reform in corporate governance from shareholder primacy towards stakeholder primacy. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires company directors to have regard in their decision-making to the interests of their employees and to the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment. All large companies must report annually on how their directors have fulfilled this duty. Section 172 enshrines in statute the "enlightened shareholder value" principle, which recognises that the long-term success of a company depends in part on the ongoing consideration of wider stakeholder interests. This contrasts with the "shareholder maximisation" principle underpinning directors' duties in some other jurisdictions, in which directors owe their duty only to shareholders. The Government welcomes suggestions on how to ensure companies consider wider stakeholder interests alongside the needs of stakeholders. I look forward to considering the clauses of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill when available. I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member for Newton Abbot to discuss his Private Member's Bill. |
Company Directors (Duties) Bill
Asked by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) Friday 20th June 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if he will support the (a) passage and (b) principle of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill. Answered by Justin Madders - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires company directors to have regard in their decision-making to the interests of their employees and to the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment. All large companies must report annually on how their directors have fulfilled this duty. Section 172 enshrines in statute the "enlightened shareholder value" principle, which recognises that the long-term success of a company depends in part on the ongoing consideration of wider stakeholder interests. This contrasts with the "shareholder maximisation" principle underpinning directors' duties in some other jurisdictions, in which directors owe their duty only to shareholders. The Government welcomes suggestions on how to ensure companies consider wider stakeholder interests alongside the needs of stakeholders. I look forward to considering the clauses of the Company Directors (Duties) Bill when available. I would be pleased to meet with the Honourable Member for Newton Abbot to discuss his Private Member's Bill. |
Early Day Motions |
---|
Monday 16th June Better Business Day campaign and the Company Directors (Duties) Bill 28 signatures (Most recent: 8 Jul 2025)Tabled by: Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat - Newton Abbot) That this House welcomes Better Business Day and congratulates all those involved in raising awareness of the Better Business Act campaign, which seeks to amend company law to ensure directors have a duty to advance the interests of shareholders while also considering the wider community and the environment; recognises that … |