Found: Rights Act • Public Inquiries Act 2005• Coroners Act 1959 • Freedom of Information Act 2000 • Data Protection Act

Found: The UK Government is required by the Data Protection Act 2018 to keep all adequacy decisions under review

Found: authorities under legislation such as the Equality Act 2010, the Public Services Equality Duty, Data Protection Act

Found: Relevant ones here are the Data Protection Act 2018 (which has specific clauses on profiling and automated

Found: requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation, Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Data Protection Act

Found: The Guardian 2018 (25) Data protection Act 2018 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government how many children from Gypsy, Roma and Traveller backgrounds are currently held in the youth secure estate, broken down by (1) young offender institutions, (2) secure training centres, and (3) secure children's homes.

Answered by Lord Timpson - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

No children from a Gypsy, Roma or Traveller background are currently accommodated in the Oasis Restore Secure School or Oakhill Secure Training Centre.

In relation to Secure Children’s Homes and Young Offender Institutions: the information requested cannot be provided without breaching our legal obligations under data protection legislation. Where a request is made for statistical information and the total figure amounts to five or fewer, we must consider whether this would be likely to lead to the identification of individuals and whether disclosure of this information would be in breach of our statutory obligations under the UK General Data Protection Regulation and/or the Data Protection Act 2018.

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the longest period is that a person is in prison over their minimum tariff; and what the original tariff length was for that person.

Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury

We believe that disclosing the exact tariff information for a single person would be likely to lead to the individual concerned being identified. For this reason, we have chosen to provide figures for the ten prisoners who have served the longest period over their minimum tariff.

The table below shows ten unreleased prisoners that have served the longest period over their tariff, broken down by their tariff length, as of 31 December 2024. All ten prisoners have served 35 years or more over their minimum tariff.

Notes:

1. Tariff length is the time between date of sentencing and tariff expiry date and does not take into account any time served on remand.

2. Figures only include those with recorded tariff information.

Where a request is made for information and the total figure amounts to five or fewer, we must consider whether this would be likely to lead to the identification of individuals and whether disclosure of this information would be in breach of our statutory obligations under the UK General Data Protection Regulation and/or the Data Protection Act 2018.

Question to the Department for Work and Pensions:

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of GDPR regulations on people who experience bank (a) fraud ,(b) error and (c) deletions.

Answered by Andrew Western - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Work and Pensions)

DWP will ensure that any data is processed in compliance with UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. The Department routinely handles large volumes of data and has robust security processes in place to manage the safe transfer, storage, and use of data.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent estimate she has made of the number of people in the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix who have been convicted under joint enterprise laws.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing.

Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of identifying an independent body to safeguard data relating to the Metropolitan Police’s Gangs Violence Matrix.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing.

Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will instruct the Metropolitan Police to delay the deletion of its Gangs Violence Matrix.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing.

Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on (a) the potential impact of its gang violence matrix on ethnic minority groups and (b) the steps it is taking to ensure that its policing practices are not discriminatory.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing.

Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on taking steps to allow people who have been wrongfully included on the gang violence matrix to challenge their inclusion before the deletion deadline.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gangs Violence Matrix (GVM) was an intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The police are operationally independent of the government, and the GVM was devised and operated by the Metropolitan Police, independently of the Home Office. The deletion of the data held on the GVM is a matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing.

Following an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the Metropolitan Police made the decision to discontinue use of the GVM after 13 February 2024. The Metropolitan Police had already previously decided that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This decision was taken in order to satisfy both Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM and to ensure that any claims under Article 8 Human Rights Act could be answered. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Any form of discrimination in policing is unacceptable. The Government is supportive of the NPCC and College of Policing’s Police Race Action Plan which aims to improve policing’s engagement with Black communities. A number of forces have developed their own local plans to address specific needs from their communities, including the MPS.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure people who were convicted using information from the Gang Violence Matrix can appeal their convictions after the database is deleted.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed.

Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice.

The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM.

In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to contact people who were included on the Gang Violence Matrix to enable them to access their information before its deletion on 13 February 2025.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed.

Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice.

The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM.

In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold discussions with the Metropolitan Police on the steps it is taking to ensure that data shared with third parties from the gang violence matrix is not (a) misused and (b) further disseminated.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed.

Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice.

The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM.

In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to help improve the transparency of processes for the (a) collection, (b) retention and (c) use of data by the police.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed.

Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice.

The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM.

In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of the permanent deletion of the Metropolitan Police's Gang Violence Matrix database on access to justice for people who were wrongfully included on the database.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Gang Violence Matrix (GVM) was an operational intelligence tool used by the Metropolitan Police to identify and risk-assess individuals involved with gangs across London.

The deletion of the data held on the GVM is an operational matter for the Metropolitan Police as the data controller, and it is their sole responsibility to exercise their retention policies in line with the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. The Metropolitan Police’s use of the GVM is subject to an enforcement notice from the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). We understand that since the enforcement notice the names on the GVM have been under regular review, and since its inception in 2012 over 4,000 names have been removed.

Following the enforcement notice from the ICO, the Metropolitan Police made a decision that GVM data would be retained for a period of 12 months, from the date of decommission (13 February 2024), as there was no policing purpose to justify the continued retention of the data. This means that all data will permanently be destroyed on 13 February 2025. This decision was taken in order to satisfy Right of Access requests from persons seeking clarity on their inclusion on the GVM. Any individual that considers they may have been included on the GVM is therefore entitled to submit a Subject Access Request to the Metropolitan Police by 13 February 2025, and the Metropolitan Police advise the public of this on their website.

Additionally, the ICO’s enforcement notice already requires that the Metropolitan Police review their sharing of information with third parties and, as the relevant supervisory authority, the ICO have the necessary powers to enforce compliance with said notice.

The Home Office does not hold any data on individuals being charged, prosecuted or incarcerated based on information held on the GVM.

In relation to the transparency of the process by which the Police collect retain and use data, the Police are subject to the Data Protection Act 2018 and authorised professional practice from the College of Policing. However, as part of the Home Office’s police reform agenda we will explore how best to support policing in the collection, use and management of their data for a range of operational and analytical purposes.

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether she plans to roll out automatic number plate recognition cameras in (a) Forest of Dean and (b) other rural constituencies.

Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Home Office)

The National ANPR infrastructure is governed by national standards which are available here https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-anpr-standards. Prior to the deployment of ANPR cameras an assessment must identify a need, which could include the impact on local crime, community confidence, serious organised crime, or national security.

Police Forces and Law Enforcement Agencies are responsible for ensuring additional static ANPR cameras within their area are appropriate in line with national standards and the Data Protection Act. The Home Office has no plan to alter this arrangement.

Found: Data Protection Act 20183.—(1) The Data Protection Act 2018(12) is amended as follows. (2) In section

Found: Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 74A(1)(a), (3), (5) and (6)(b) of the Data Protection Act

Found: personal data need to register with the ICO, and ensure they meet the legal requirements of the Data Protection Act

Found: The Data Protection Act 2018 specifies when this can be carried out, and what protections must be in

Found: (8) In subsection (7) “the data protection legislation” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act

Found: 1 (10) In this section “the data protection legislation” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act

Found: (10) 10 In this section “the data protection legislation” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act

Found: held on them, and which private companies are accessing their data in accordance with the data protection act

Found: Changes to the Data Protection Act 2018, UK General Data Protection Regulation and the Privacy and

Found: Changes to Part 3 and Part 4 of the Data Protection Act 2018 40 Some of the differences between Part

Found: Exempts the processing of personal data for law enforcement purposes under Part 3 of the Data Protection Act

Found: maintained in accordance with data protection legislation, including the Data Protection Act

Found: (2) Accordingly, the Data Protection Act 2018 is amended as follows.

Found: (2) In this Part “processing” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act 2018 (see section

Found: to respond to and support a care experienced adult making a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act

Found: does not require the disclosure of personal data (within the meaning of section 3(2) of the Data Protection Act

Found: does not require the disclosure of personal data (within the meaning of section 3(2) of the Data Protection Act

Found: be consistent with the ‘Data sharing code of practice’ published under section 121 of the Data Protection Act

Found: forces who hold the data will also be required to process the data in accordance with the Data Protection Act

Found: functions with the Home Office, other government departments (within 27 the meaning of the Data Protection Act

Found: ............................................ 51 Clause 11: Amendment of Schedule 7 to the Data Protection Act

Found: ............................................. 19 Clause 11: Amendment of Schedule 7 to the Data Protection Act

Found: State 10 Exclusion of application to the armed forces 11 Amendment of Schedule 7 to the Data Protection Act

Found: of State 10 Exclusion of application to the armed forces 11 Amendment of Schedule 7 to the Data Protection Act

Found: data will be subject to the requirements in the UK General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act

Found: (9) In this section— “data protection legislation” has the same meaning as in the Data Protection Act

Found: be disclosed in accordance with UK legislation (the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: be disclosed in accordance with UK legislation (the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: be disclosed in accordance with UK legislation (the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: be disclosed in accordance with UK legislation (the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: be disclosed in accordance with UK legislation (the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: policy. 10.4 All vetting data must be managed in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act

Found: the processing of personal data and privacy, including but not limited to: (1) UK GDPR; (2) Data Protection Act

Found: Under the Data Protection Act I understand that I may only use the recording for the purposes of my own

Found: During 2020/21, Ofcom also received 41 Subject Access Requests under the Data Protection Act 2018 (

Found: During 2021/22, Ofcom also received 31 Subject Access Requests under the Data Protection Act 218 (41

Found: , including but not limited to Charities Act 2011, Equality Act 2010, Bribery Act 2010 and Data Protection Act

Found: against the core department, some of which involve possible financial liabilities. 10,100 Data Protection Act

Found: against the core department, some of which involve possible financial liabilities. 10,100 Data Protection Act

Found: Section 40(2) has been applied to in order to protect personal information as governed by the Data Protection Act

Found: information is received by either party under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or the Data Protection Act

Found: CITB reports it follows the principles of UK GDPR and the legislative requirements of the Data Protection Act

Found: The Department will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act (DPA) and

Found: The Department will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act (DPA) and

Found: The Department will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act (DPA) and

Found: (EU Exit) Regulations 2019), the UK Data Protection Act 2018 and the Privacy and Electronic Communications

Found: special severance payments conflicting with a legal obligation arising as a result of the Data Protection Act

Found: requests for disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or rights of access under the Data protection Act

Found: The UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018 Ipsos is

Found: requests for disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 or rights of access under the Data protection Act

Found: Figures fewer than 5 are supressed due to rounding to avoid disclosure required by the Data Protection Act

Found: (Trustworthiness pillar, T6 Data governance) To comply with this and with the Data Protection Act of

Found: abstract_id=4713111. 825 UK Parliament, Data Protection Act 2018, Section 46: Right to Rectification

Found: functions with the Home Office, other government departments (within 27 the meaning of the Data Protection Act

Found: Data protection legislation (the Data Protection Act 2018 (the DPA 2018) and UK General Data Protection

Found: for the performance of the task carried out in the public interest, in accordance with s.8 Data Protection Act

Found: third parties only in compliance with the UK General Data Protection Regulation and the UK Data Protection Act

Found: individuals with regards to the processing of personal data including, but not limited to, the Data Protection Act

Found: policy. 10.4 All vetting data must be managed in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act

Found: the processing of personal data and privacy, including but not limited to: (1) UK GDPR; (2) Data Protection Act

Found: to third parties only in compliance with the UK General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act

Found: requirements set out in the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR), the Data Protection Act

Found: Protection Data Protection Registered organisations must comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Act

Found: Details Registered organisations must comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Act 2018

Found: and Crime Act 2017 establishes a statutory duty for blue light services collaboration, the Data Protection Act

Found: carrying out functions on its behalf;Data Protection Legislation means (i) the UK GDPR, (ii) the Data Protection Act

Found: © Crown Copyright 5 Releasing reports under the Data Protection Act Section 45 of the Data

Found: local authority involved in an investigation after a request for personal information under the Data Protection Act

Found: © Crown Copyright 5 Releasing reports under the Data Protection Act Section 45 of the Data

Found: local authority involved in an investigation after a request for personal information under the Data Protection Act

Found: Data Protection Act All organisations have a responsibility to ensure personal data has

Found: information on how the MMO processes personal data and information on your rights under the Data Protection Act

Found: information on how the MMO processes personal data and information on your rights under the Data Protection Act

Found: any Personal Data Breach; “Data Protection Impact Assessment” means as specified in the Data Protection Act

Found: ensure that they comply with the Data Protection Legislation On 25th May 2018 the GPDR and Data Protection Act

Found: Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 2018.

Found: Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998.

Found: Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 2018.

Found: Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 2018.

Found: Responsible for Information training and they understand their responsibilities under the Data Protection Act

Found: The UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018 Ipsos is

Found: abstract_id=4713111. 825 UK Parliament, Data Protection Act 2018, Section 46: Right to Rectification

Found: During 2020/21, Ofcom also received 41 Subject Access Requests under the Data Protection Act 2018 (

Found: During 2021/22, Ofcom also received 31 Subject Access Requests under the Data Protection Act 218 (41

Found: , including but not limited to Charities Act 2011, Equality Act 2010, Bribery Act 2010 and Data Protection Act

Found: consistent with the requirements of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act

Found: ensure access to information is managed correctly in line with data protection legislation (Data Protection Act

Found: ensure access to information is managed correctly in line with data protection legislation (Data Protection Act

Found: the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000, the General Data Protection Regulation, and the Data Protection Act

Found: information is received by either party under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or the Data Protection Act

Found: and its disclosure under the Act would breach any of the data protection principles of the Data Protection Act

Found: and its disclosure under the Act would breach any of the data protection principles of the Data Protection Act

Found: and its disclosure under the Act would breach any of the data protection principles of the Data Protection Act

Found: Office is an Executive Agency of HM Revenue & Customs, which is a Data Controller under the Data Protection Act

Found: disclosed to third parties in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act

Found: Data protection Providers must take into account and comply with the provisions of the Data Protection Act

Found: Data Protection Act 20183.—(1) The Data Protection Act 2018(12) is amended as follows. (2) In section

Found: The UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act (DPA) 2018 Ipsos is

Found: http://www. g ov.uk/ g overnment/or g anisations/ g overnment-di g ital-service), or the Data Protection Act

Found: may be subject to publication or disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act

Found: abstract_id=4713111. 825 UK Parliament, Data Protection Act 2018, Section 46: Right to Rectification

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: ProtectionAll personal information supplied will be treated as confidential and will be subject to the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and in Section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: individuals with regard to the processing of Personal Data to which a Party is subject including the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: These laws are the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA), the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: handled under the requirements of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDRP) and the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: individuals) and disclosing it would contravene the data protection principles in Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1)of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: individuals with regard to the processing of Personal Data to which a Party is subject including the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and in Section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Environmental Information Regulations 2004, Environmental Information (Scotland) Regulations 2004), Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: the organisation a public authority or body as set out in Part 2, Chapter 2, Section 7 of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: under UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 2018 article 6(1)e  and article 9 2(j) and Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and in Section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: my knowledge and that I undertake to notify Marine Scotland in advance of any changes. 23 Data Protection Act

Found: with regard to the processing of Personal Data to which a Party is subject including the Data Protection Act

Found: not protecting personal data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998, o Danger to the environment

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Disclosing the information would contravene the data protection principles in the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: prohibits, restricts access or relates to the disclosure of that information, for example the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: The "UK GDPR" and the Data Protection Act 201826 together provide the legal framework for data protection

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: legislation, such as the addition of the Management of Offenders (Scotland) Act 2019 and the updated Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: including but not limited to medical treatment as though they are special category data under the Data Protection Act

Found: you have asked for because as per the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UKGDPR) and the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and in Section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: requested because the Marine Directorate observes the data protection principles set out within the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: requester’s client, so it is subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act

Found: party and disclosing it would contravene the data protection principles in Schedule 1 to the Data Protection Act

Found: principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act