To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


View sample alert

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Tax Avoidance: Prosecutions
Monday 18th March 2024

Asked by: Matthew Offord (Conservative - Hendon)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate his Department has made of the number of prosecutions that have been made against the promoters and operators of schemes now subject to the Loan Charge.

Answered by Bim Afolami

I refer the hon. Member for Hendon to the answer given on 8 February 2024 to Question UIN 12466.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance: Bankruptcy
Thursday 14th March 2024

Asked by: Desmond Swayne (Conservative - New Forest West)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent representations has he received on section 684 notices.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

In May 2022, the Court of Appeal confirmed that HMRC could use provisions in tax legislation (section 684(7A)(b) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003). HMRC is using these provisions in line with the Court of Appeal judgment.

The Government has received representations about s684(7A)(b) from several Members on behalf of their constituents, as well as the All Party Parliamentary Group on the Loan Charge and Taxpayer Fairness.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Tuesday 12th March 2024

Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many section 684 notices were issued by HMRC in each of the last five years.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

In the context of Disguised Remuneration (DR), HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has in some circumstances used the power provided under s.684(7A)(b) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (the Discretion) to collect the tax owed; and since 2022, HMRC has issued around 2,700 decisions using the Discretion.

In his independent review, Lord Morse recommended that the Loan Charge should no longer apply to loans made before 9 December 2010. However, Lord Morse said “HMRC should continue being able to settle and investigate cases prior to this point under their normal powers where they have appropriate grounds, and a legal basis, to do so”.

In line with this recommendation, HMRC is still seeking to recover the tax due where it had taken the necessary steps in the past to ensure there is an open tax enquiry or assessment which gives it the legal basis to do so.

In May 2022, the Court of Appeal said that HMRC could consider using the Discretion to collect tax directly from the individual who received income through a DR scheme.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Tuesday 12th March 2024

Asked by: Sammy Wilson (Democratic Unionist Party - East Antrim)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many notices under section 684 of the Income Tax Act 2007 have been issued to individuals with Loan Charge liabilities incurred before December 2010.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

In the context of Disguised Remuneration (DR), HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has in some circumstances used the power provided under s.684(7A)(b) of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (the Discretion) to collect the tax owed; and since 2022, HMRC has issued around 2,700 decisions using the Discretion.

In his independent review, Lord Morse recommended that the Loan Charge should no longer apply to loans made before 9 December 2010. However, Lord Morse said “HMRC should continue being able to settle and investigate cases prior to this point under their normal powers where they have appropriate grounds, and a legal basis, to do so”.

In line with this recommendation, HMRC is still seeking to recover the tax due where it had taken the necessary steps in the past to ensure there is an open tax enquiry or assessment which gives it the legal basis to do so.

In May 2022, the Court of Appeal said that HMRC could consider using the Discretion to collect tax directly from the individual who received income through a DR scheme.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Monday 4th March 2024

Asked by: Janet Daby (Labour - Lewisham East)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the number of people who have been affected by the loan charge.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

In September 2023, HM Revenue and Customs published an updated issue briefing on disguised remuneration and the loan charge. The issue briefing contains information at UK level and is available on GOV.UK here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hmrc-issue-briefing-disguised-remuneration-charge-on-loans/hmrc-issue-briefing-settling-disguised-remuneration-scheme-use-andor-paying-the-loan-charge#customers-subject-to-the-loan-charge


Written Question
Tax Avoidance: Bankruptcy
Monday 26th February 2024

Asked by: Drew Hendry (Scottish National Party - Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he has made an assessment of the compatibility of the issuing of section 684 notices by HMRC with the recommendations of the independent loan charge review led by Sir Amyas Morse.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

The Loan Charge is targeted at contrived tax avoidance schemes that sought to avoid Income Tax and National Insurance contributions by paying users their income in the form of loans.

In his independent review, Lord Morse recommended that the Loan Charge no longer apply to loans made before 9 December 2010. However, Lord Morse said “HMRC should continue being able to settle and investigate cases prior to this point under their normal powers where they have appropriate grounds, and a legal basis, to do so”. The government accepted this recommendation. In line with this recommendation, HMRC is still seeking to recover the tax due where it had taken the necessary steps in the past to give it the legal basis to do so.

In May 2022, the Court of Appeal said that HMRC could consider using certain provisions in the PAYE system (referred to as ‘section 684(7A)(b)’) to collect tax directly from the individual who received income through a DR scheme. HMRC using these provisions where appropriate is in line with Lord Morse’s recommendation.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Thursday 8th February 2024

Asked by: Ranil Jayawardena (Conservative - North East Hampshire)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will have discussions with HMRC on ending actions on the loan charge.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

The Loan Charge was introduced to ensure that people who had not had tax deducted from their incomes paid their fair share.

The Government has already had an independent review. In 2019 Lord Morse led an independent review of the Loan Charge and its implementation. Lord Morse had full discretion over how the review was run, whom he consulted, and the recommendations made. The Government accepted 19 of his 20 recommendations, which benefited more than 30,000 people, including around 9,500 who were removed from the scope of the Loan Charge entirely.

As well as recommending changes to the policy, Lord Morse was clear that the Loan Charge was necessary, in the public interest and should remain in force.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Thursday 8th February 2024

Asked by: Ranil Jayawardena (Conservative - North East Hampshire)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will commission an independent review into the loan charge.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

The Loan Charge was introduced to ensure that people who had not had tax deducted from their incomes paid their fair share.

The Government has already had an independent review. In 2019 Lord Morse led an independent review of the Loan Charge and its implementation. Lord Morse had full discretion over how the review was run, whom he consulted, and the recommendations made. The Government accepted 19 of his 20 recommendations, which benefited more than 30,000 people, including around 9,500 who were removed from the scope of the Loan Charge entirely.

As well as recommending changes to the policy, Lord Morse was clear that the Loan Charge was necessary, in the public interest and should remain in force.


Written Question
Tax Avoidance
Thursday 8th February 2024

Asked by: Ranil Jayawardena (Conservative - North East Hampshire)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many (a) promoters and (b) operators of schemes subject to the loan charge have been prosecuted.

Answered by Nigel Huddleston - Shadow Financial Secretary (Treasury)

Promotion or operation of mass marketed tax avoidance schemes is not in, or of itself, a criminal offence. However, there are a range of offences which might be committed by those who promote tax avoidance schemes or advise on their use.

On that basis, to date, while there have been no prosecutions of individuals for the promotion and/or operation of schemes subject to the Loan Charge, one individual involved in selling Disguised Remuneration schemes subject to the Loan Charge has been convicted for a related offence. Also, a number of individuals are currently under criminal investigation by HMRC for offences linked to schemes subject to the Loan Charge.

In addition to schemes subject to the Loan Charge, since 1 April 2016, more than 20 individuals have been convicted for offences relating to arrangements which have been promoted and marketed as tax avoidance. These have resulted in over 100 years of custodial sentences and 9 years of suspended sentences being ordered, the majority of which relate to promoters.

Prosecutions are only one type of intervention available to HMRC where they identify concerns.


Written Question
Bounce Back Loan Scheme
Tuesday 6th February 2024

Asked by: Charlotte Nichols (Labour - Warrington North)

Question to the Department for Business and Trade:

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what her Department's policy is on lenders threatening to charge additional fees and penalties on the repayment of loans under the Bounce Back Loan Scheme; and whether her Department has taken enforcement action against such lenders.

Answered by Kevin Hollinrake - Shadow Secretary of State for Business and Trade

As part of the scheme design, no early repayment fees or other lender-levied fees of any type following drawdown were permitted.

The Lender Audit and Assurance Programme verifies appropriate administration of Covid Loan Scheme portfolios by accredited Delivery Partners in line with their contractual obligations. If any concerns are identified, remedial actions are agreed with Delivery Partners to rectify areas failing to meet guarantee requirements.

Should a person or organisation have any particular concerns or incidents to raise, these can be directed to the British Business Bank via the contact form available at: https://www.british-business-bank.co.uk/contact-details/.