To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


View sample alert

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Double Taxation: Treaties
Wednesday 4th November 2015

Asked by: Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what consultation they undertake prior to, or during, negotiations with a developing country on a taxation treaty.

Answered by Lord O'Neill of Gatley

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have responsibility for negotiating the UK’s double taxation agreements, subject to oversight by HM Treasury. HMRC run an annual consultation exercise to establish the negotiating priorities for the coming year, which are then approved by ministers. As part of this exercise they consider representations made by UK businesses, NGOs and government departments, including the Department for International Development, as well as the UK’s diplomatic missions throughout the world. When the programme is published it also invites representations about our forward programme.


HMRC’s programme for 2015/16 covers the following countries: Colombia, Fiji*, Ghana, Guernsey, India, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, Kazakhstan*, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho*, Malawi*, Portugal*, Russia, Thailand*, Turkmenistan*, UAE*, US, Uruguay*.


The UK’s starting point in negotiations is based closely on the OECD Model Double Taxation Convention, which is also the basis for most other countries’ tax treaties. Some developing countries prefer to follow the UN Model, the provisions of which differ in some areas to the OECD Model, and the UK has agreed to adopt these provisions in its treaties. The object of the negotiations is to produce a text acceptable to both countries, balancing their preferences. There is no timetable for how long negotiations should take. It is quite normal for negotiations to take two to three rounds to complete.


Consultation during the negotiations would be rare.


*Negotiations largely completed.


Written Question
Double Taxation: Treaties
Wednesday 4th November 2015

Asked by: Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what terms they seek in taxation treaties with developing countries, and how they agree those terms before opening negotiations.

Answered by Lord O'Neill of Gatley

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have responsibility for negotiating the UK’s double taxation agreements, subject to oversight by HM Treasury. HMRC run an annual consultation exercise to establish the negotiating priorities for the coming year, which are then approved by ministers. As part of this exercise they consider representations made by UK businesses, NGOs and government departments, including the Department for International Development, as well as the UK’s diplomatic missions throughout the world. When the programme is published it also invites representations about our forward programme.


HMRC’s programme for 2015/16 covers the following countries: Colombia, Fiji*, Ghana, Guernsey, India, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, Kazakhstan*, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho*, Malawi*, Portugal*, Russia, Thailand*, Turkmenistan*, UAE*, US, Uruguay*.


The UK’s starting point in negotiations is based closely on the OECD Model Double Taxation Convention, which is also the basis for most other countries’ tax treaties. Some developing countries prefer to follow the UN Model, the provisions of which differ in some areas to the OECD Model, and the UK has agreed to adopt these provisions in its treaties. The object of the negotiations is to produce a text acceptable to both countries, balancing their preferences. There is no timetable for how long negotiations should take. It is quite normal for negotiations to take two to three rounds to complete.


Consultation during the negotiations would be rare.


*Negotiations largely completed.


Written Question
Double Taxation: Treaties
Wednesday 4th November 2015

Asked by: Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Her Majesty’s Government with which developing countries they are currently negotiating taxation treaties, and what is the timetable for each negotiation.

Answered by Lord O'Neill of Gatley

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have responsibility for negotiating the UK’s double taxation agreements, subject to oversight by HM Treasury. HMRC run an annual consultation exercise to establish the negotiating priorities for the coming year, which are then approved by ministers. As part of this exercise they consider representations made by UK businesses, NGOs and government departments, including the Department for International Development, as well as the UK’s diplomatic missions throughout the world. When the programme is published it also invites representations about our forward programme.


HMRC’s programme for 2015/16 covers the following countries: Colombia, Fiji*, Ghana, Guernsey, India, Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, Kazakhstan*, Kyrgyzstan, Lesotho*, Malawi*, Portugal*, Russia, Thailand*, Turkmenistan*, UAE*, US, Uruguay*.


The UK’s starting point in negotiations is based closely on the OECD Model Double Taxation Convention, which is also the basis for most other countries’ tax treaties. Some developing countries prefer to follow the UN Model, the provisions of which differ in some areas to the OECD Model, and the UK has agreed to adopt these provisions in its treaties. The object of the negotiations is to produce a text acceptable to both countries, balancing their preferences. There is no timetable for how long negotiations should take. It is quite normal for negotiations to take two to three rounds to complete.


Consultation during the negotiations would be rare.


*Negotiations largely completed.


Written Question
Deportation
Thursday 10th September 2015

Asked by: David T C Davies (Conservative - Monmouth)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, to which countries people have been forcibly removed in the last three years.

Answered by James Brokenshire

The table below shows the number of enforced removals from the United Kingdom by destination country for the last three years.

Table: Enforced removals by country of destination, 2012 to 2014
Country of destination201220132014
Afghanistan518496398
Albania473613823
Algeria1249060
American Samoa000
Andorra000
Angola242011
Anguilla000
Antigua and Barbuda652
Argentina439
Armenia132
Aruba000
Australia81210
Austria566831
Azerbaijan702
Bahamas, The552
Bahrain500
Bangladesh881603651
Barbados14128
Belarus1253
Belgium10011069
Belize010
Benin735
Bermuda000
Bhutan000
Bolivia712724
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba000
Bosnia and Herzegovina332
Botswana1927
Brazil339261131
British overseas citizenszzz
Brunei000
Bulgaria475870
Burkina002
Burma401
Burundi810
Cambodia000
Cameroon492935
Canada273421
Cape Verde000
Cayman Islands000
Central African Republic100
Chad000
Chile322013
China617512423
Christmas Island000
Cocos (Keeling) Islands000
Colombia866434
Comoros000
Congo785
Congo (Democratic Republic)1464
Cook Islands000
Costa Rica133
Croatia7813
Cuba000
Curacao000
Cyprus1489
Cyprus (Northern part of)000
Czech Republic3658110
Denmark161312
Djibouti000
Dominica355
Dominican Republic031
East Timor010
Ecuador1096
Egypt535144
El Salvador010
Equatorial Guinea010
Eritrea010
Estonia11912
Ethiopia1163
Falkland Islands000
Faroe Islands000
Fiji932
Finland974
Former Yugoslavia100
France286327397
French Guiana100
French Polynesia000
Gabon001
Gambia, The725721
Georgia32288
Germany14412379
Ghana229186158
Gibraltar000
Greece766
Greenland000
Grenada1033
Guadeloupe000
Guam000
Guatemala941
Guinea576
Guinea-Bissau100
Guyana644
Haiti000
Heard Island and McDonald Islands000
Honduras132
Hong Kong131011
Hungary274452
Iceland001
India2,0871,3571,135
Indonesia91213
Iran27189
Iraq559942
Ireland214178106
Israel1265
Italy297366377
Ivory Coast12912
Jamaica306287284
Japan4123
Jordan1279
Kazakhstan132
Kenya504251
Kiribati100
Korea (North)000
Korea (South)101010
Kosovo243028
Kuwait123
Kyrgyzstan422
Laos010
Latvia10594189
Lebanon434
Lesotho010
Liberia230
Libya82418
Liechtenstein000
Lithuania193324425
Luxembourg120
Macau323
Macedonia133
Madagascar101
Malawi615122
Malaysia14712782
Maldives010
Mali124
Malta685
Marshall Islands000
Martinique000
Mauritania101
Mauritius525643
Mayotte000
Mexico521914
Micronesia000
Moldova24125
Monaco001
Mongolia231313
Montenegro111
Montserrat000
Morocco313242
Mozambique101
Namibia231815
Nauru000
Nepal174144153
Netherlands10511091
Netherlands Antilleszzz
New Caledonia000
New Zealand773
Nicaragua110
Niger012
Nigeria707698506
Niue000
Norfolk Island000
Northern Mariana Islands000
Norway402523
Occupied Palestinian Territories010
Oman201
Other and unknown273275352
Pakistan1,8451,8701,768
Palau000
Panama000
Papua New Guinea000
Paraguay011
Peru485
Philippines158115108
Pitcairn Islands000
Poland372415579
Portugal7281100
Puerto Rico100
Qatar200
Refugeezzz
Reunion000
Romania463705829
Russia31138
Rwanda621
Samoa000
San Marino000
Sao Tome and Principe000
Saudi Arabia3711
Senegal11129
Serbia644
Serbia and Montenegrozzz
Seychelles343
Sierra Leone241112
Singapore111
Slovakia445895
Slovenia394
Solomon Islands000
Somalia7835
South Africa585734
South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands000
Spain717059
Sri Lanka364164185
St. Helena000
St. Kitts and Nevis341
St. Lucia121211
St. Maarten (Dutch Part)000
St. Martin (French Part)000
St. Pierre and Miquelon000
St. Vincent and the Grenadines1399
Statelesszzz
Sudan727
Sudan (South)000
Surinam020
Svalbard and Jan Mayen000
Swaziland413
Sweden364529
Switzerland253624
Syria100
Taiwan745
Tajikistan100
Tanzania322416
Thailand544232
Togo341
Tokelau000
Tonga210
Trinidad and Tobago253423
Tunisia211131
Turkey13312268
Turkmenistan1081
Turks and Caicos Islands000
Tuvalu000
Uganda614825
Ukraine11279106
United Arab Emirates740
United States669870
Uruguay001
Uzbekistan372417
Vanuatu000
Vatican City000
Venezuela6109
Vietnam589468296
Virgin Islands (British)000
Virgin Islands (US)000
Wallis and Futuna000
Western Sahara000
Yemen121
Zambia19810
Zimbabwe423234
Total14,64713,31112,627

The Home Office publishes quarterly and annual statistics on the number of enforced removals from the United Kingdom for immigration purposes, within the Immigration Statistics release. Data relating to enforced removals by destination are available in tables rv_05 to rv_06_q in Immigration Statistics: April – June 2015 on the GOV.UK website: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office/series/immigration-statistics-quarterly-release


Written Question
Kyrgyzstan: Civil Liberties
Thursday 16th July 2015

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what discussions he has had with the government of Kyrgyzstan on (a) the Foreign Agents Bill and (b) freedom of expression and association in that country.

Answered by Tobias Ellwood

During his visit to Kyrgyzstan in October last year, my Noble Friend the Minister for Justice, Lord Faulks, discussed with Kyrgyz interlocutors a number of human rights issues, including the Foreign Agents Bill and other legislation that might restrict freedoms of expression and association. Our Embassy in Bishkek has also raised our concerns on a number of occasions with the government of Kyrgyzstan and with Kyrgyz parliamentarians.

We will continue to raise our concerns about human rights directly with the government of Kyrgyzstan, and in suitable international fora, at every appropriate opportunity.


Written Question
Trade Agreements: Ukraine
Monday 9th March 2015

Asked by: Lord Hylton (Crossbench - Excepted Hereditary)

Question

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their view on Ukraine having free-trade agreements with both the European Union and Russia.

Answered by Lord Livingston of Parkhead

We are a not opposed to Ukraine having a free trade agreement with the Russian Federation if it wishes to do so.

An Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union has been signed and ratified by both the Ukrainian and European parliaments. The Association Agreement establishes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), which is due to come into force from 1st January 2016. Under the terms of the DCFTA, 98.1% of the value Ukrainian exports to the EU will become tariff-free. Additionally, Ukraine is required to take steps to modernise its trade relations by undertaking certain economic reforms and aligning a number of its industrial regulations and standards with those of the European Union.

Ukraine is also a signatory to the Commonwealth of Independent States Free Trade Area (CISFTA). Established in October 2011, this is a free trade area between Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Ukraine. The EU-Ukraine DCFTA does not stop Ukraine from remaining within this free trade area.

Separately from the CISFTA, Russia has established the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) with a number of its neighbours. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and Russia are currently members. The EEU unifies its members’ import tariffs, customs regimes and a number of industrial regulations and standards. Therefore it is not possible for Ukraine to be a party, simultaneously, to both the EU-Ukraine DCFTA, which eliminates tariffs on most goods to and from the EU, and the EEU, which would require Ukraine to apply the same tariff rates as applied by Russia and the other EEU members.

However, this does not prevent Ukraine from maintaining or entering into free trade agreements with other countries or blocs, including the EEU; it leaves Ukraine free to determine its own trade policy.


Written Question
Staff
Monday 8th December 2014

Asked by: Mike Kane (Labour - Wythenshawe and Sale East)

Question to the Department for International Development:

To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many (a) locally engaged and (b) UK-based staff her Department has employed in each country with a DfID office in each year since 2010.

Answered by Desmond Swayne

The numbers of Staff Appointed in Country (SAIC) and Home Civil Service (HCS) based in DFID country offices in each year since 2010 are shown in the tables below. The figures are given for March of that year.

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

Location

HCS

SAIC

HCS

SAIC

HCS

SAIC

HCS

SAIC

HCS

SAIC

Afghanistan

32

19

41

28

37

34

45

35

40

34

Bangladesh

19

62

12

64

20

65

16

77

19

74

Bosnia and Herzegovina

0

4

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

Burma

6

4

5

5

6

5

8

11

10

18

Burundi

3

3

3

4

3

3

0

0

0

0

Cambodia

6

8

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Caribbean

9

10

8

9

8

10

12

11

12

9

China*

7

18

4

12

4

10

4

10

4

10

Democratic Republic Of Congo

14

30

18

30

21

36

24

40

29

46

Ethiopia

18

36

16

42

23

47

26

60

19

75

Gambia

0

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

Ghana

9

25

12

23

14

27

13

33

11

34

India

19

86

17

81

20

86

18

86

17

90

Indonesia**

3

8

4

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

Iraq

5

1

4

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

Kenya***

17

37

22

38

33

42

36

50

38

52

Kosovo

2

13

2

11

1

10

0

0

0

0

Kyrgyzstan

2

6

2

6

0

6

0

0

0

0

Lesotho

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Liberia****

1

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Malawi

10

30

9

26

12

32

10

37

10

40

Moldova

0

4

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mozambique

9

22

8

26

9

29

9

25

13

25

Nepal

14

35

13

37

17

40

16

42

13

43

Nigeria

24

50

23

58

33

68

35

71

36

77

OPTs

9

6

7

7

9

9

10

12

6

12

Overseas Territories

6

3

2

1

5

1

5

2

2

1

Pakistan

20

37

28

37

31

55

33

59

41

59

Rwanda

12

15

11

17

9

27

12

30

15

29

Serbia

0

5

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

Sierra Leone

11

19

9

22

13

21

16

29

17

31

South Africa

12

21

10

21

17

19

21

17

22

20

South Sudan

0

0

0

0

17

15

20

18

6

20

Sudan

14

10

16

23

12

13

13

13

13

16

Tajikistan

2

7

2

7

1

7

4

7

4

7

Tanzania

13

20

14

19

19

23

21

29

24

32

Uganda

11

23

10

24

11

28

9

33

23

35

Vietnam

5

18

5

19

5

19

3

19

3

16

Yemen

4

4

4

3

2

4

3

3

2

3

Zambia

10

22

13

19

15

23

16

29

16

32

Zimbabwe

9

21

9

21

12

19

13

19

15

18

*Our office in China works with the Chinese government to help reduce poverty in other developing countries. In March 2011 DFID closed its bilateral aid programme to China.

** In March 2011, DFID closed its poverty reduction programme and the DFID country office in Indonesia.

*** DFID Somalia was run out of the DFID Kenya office until April 2014

**** DFID’s programmes in Liberia are run from the Sierra Leone office.


Written Question
WHO Framework Convention On Tobacco Control
Tuesday 21st October 2014

Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the transparency and accountability of the Moscow Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Answered by Jane Ellison

The sixth session of the Conference of the Parties to the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) was held in Moscow over 13-18 October 2014. The United Kingdom was represented at the Conference, as were the following Parties to the treaty:

Afghanistan, Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, European Union, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People's Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lesotho, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia (Federated States of), Mongolia, Montenegro, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Viet Nam, Yemen and Zambia.

An official report of the proceedings of the Conference will be published in November 2014.

In addition, the next Conference to be held in 2016 will consider options that would further maximise transparency, particularly with regard to Party delegations to Conference of the Parties and subsidiary bodies.


Written Question
Asylum: Deportation
Thursday 11th September 2014

Asked by: David T C Davies (Conservative - Monmouth)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many asylum seekers have been deported to other European countries in each of the last four years.

Answered by James Brokenshire

The table below provides the total number of enforced removals of asylum cases to other European countries, in each year from 2010 to 2013.

Enforced removals of asylum cases to Europe, 2010 to 2013 (1)(2)(3)(4)
YearTotal asylum enforced removals
20101,583
20111,276
20121,068
2013 (P)1,188
(1) Destination as recorded on source database; all nationals returned to Europe.
(2) Removals are recorded on the system as at the dates on which the data extracts were taken.
(3) Recorded on the system as having claimed asylum at some point.
(4) Europe consists of: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Cyprus (Northern part of), Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, Former Yugoslavia, France, Georgia, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Greenland, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Svalbard and Jan Mayen, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vatican City.


Deportations are a specific subset of removals which are enforced either following a criminal conviction or when it is judged that a person’s removal from the UK is conducive to the public good. The deportation order prohibits the person returning to the UK until such time as it may be revoked. It is not possible to separately identify deportations from enforced removals.

It is not possible within these figures to say at what stage in the asylum process individuals have reached at the time of their removal, including
whether their claim has failed at that point, as those departing voluntarily can do so at any stage without necessarily notifying the Home Office.

The Home Office publishes quarterly and annual statistics on the number of persons removed or departed voluntarily from the UK and on persons refused entry to the United Kingdom within Immigration Statistics. The data on removals and voluntary departures by type are available in the latest release, Immigration Statistics: April – June 2013, tables rv.06 and rv.06.q from GOV.UK on the statistics web pages at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office/series/immigration-statistics-quarterly-release and will be placed in the Library of the House.


Written Question
Immigration: Windrush Generation
Wednesday 7th May 2014

Asked by: Keith Vaz (Labour - Leicester East)

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many travel document applications arising from each country were being processed as of 1 April 2014.

Answered by James Brokenshire

The following table gives a breakdown, by nationality, of outstanding
applications for a Home Office Travel Document.

To align with protocol on publishing statistics, the list represents the
position at 31 December 2013. However, most of the cases shown as outstanding have
been concluded since that date.

Nationality

No. Of Cases

Afghanistan

447

Albania

85

Algeria

28

Angola

50

Antigua & Barbuda

1

Armenia

2

Austria

1

Azerbaijan

11

Bahrain

4

Bangladesh

16

Belarus

23

Bhutan

18

Bosnia & Herzegovina

2

Botswana

1

Burkina Faso

1

Burundi

44

Cameroon

54

Chad

7

Chile

1

China

75

Colombia

13

Congo

24

Cote D'Ivoire (Ivory Coast)

34

Croatia

4

Czech Republic

3

Democratic People's Republic of Korea

22

Democratic Republic of the Congo

261

Dominica

1

Ecuador

10

Egypt

32

Eritrea

735

Ethiopia

56

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

42

France

1

Gambia

81

Georgia

7

Ghana

12

Grenada

2

Guinea

28

Guinea-Bissau

1

Haiti

1

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China

1

India

14

Iran (Islamic Republic of)

1,228

Iraq

504

Israel

1

Jamaica

18

Jordan

2

Kenya

23

Kosovo

171

Kosovo Resident - UN Issued Travel Document

1

Kuwait

26

Kuwait Bidoun

2

Kyrgyzstan

3

Lebanon

5

Liberia

15

Libya

98

Macedonia (Former Yugoslav Republic of)

3

Malawi

4

Malaysia

3

Maldives

3

Mauritania

3

Mauritius

1

Mongolia

8

Morocco

5

Mozambique

2

Myanmar

84

Nepal

2

Nigeria

60

Officially Stateless

1

Pakistan

421

Palestinian Authority

34

Refugee - Article 1 of the 1951 Convention

173

Refugee - Other

2

Republic of Serbia

20

Romania

3

Russian Federation

41

Rwanda

34

Saudi Arabia

4

Senegal

11

Sierra Leone

22

Slovakia

1

Somalia

1,210

South Africa

3

Sri Lanka

427

Stateless Person (Article 1 of 1954 Convention)

111

St Vincent & the Grenadines

1

Sudan

284

Swaziland

3

Syria Arab Republic

587

Tajikistan

1

Thailand

2

Togo

16

Tonga

1

Trinidad & Tobago

1

Tunisia

4

Turkey

66

Turkish controlled area of Cyprus

4

Turkmenistan

1

Uganda

73

Ukraine

3

United Rep of Tanzania

7

United States of America

2

Uruguay

1

Uzbekistan

10

Venezuela

2

Vietnam

36

Yemen

31

Zambia

3

Zimbabwe

508

Total

8,731