To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


View sample alert

Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Young Offenders: Ethnic Groups
Friday 2nd February 2024

Asked by: Kerry McCarthy (Labour - Bristol East)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to Barnardo's report entitled Double discrimination: Black care-experienced young adults navigating the criminal justice system, published on 21 September 2023, whether he has made an assessment of discrimination affecting Black care-experienced young adults who have involvement with the criminal justice system.

Answered by Edward Argar - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

We are grateful for the work Barnardo's have done to highlight the challenges faced by young black care-experienced people in our criminal justice system, and I was delighted to meet with them on 30 January to discuss the Double Discrimination report. We look forward to working with them further to ensure we are tackling these issues.

Across the criminal justice system, we are taking forward an extensive programme of work to tackle unexplained disparities where they are identified. The Inclusive Britain strategy is central to the development of this work and contains some of our flagship efforts.

We are also updating our strategy for people with care experience in the criminal justice system, to ensure we are using care-experienced people’s time in the criminal justice system to support them to lead crime-free lives. In this work, we will be building on the work done by Barnardo’s to focus on race and its role in shaping the experiences and outcomes of those with care experience in the criminal justice system, and developing proposals to address this.

We are aiming to publish this strategy later this year.


Written Question
Maternity Services: Safety
Thursday 1st February 2024

Asked by: Olivia Blake (Labour - Sheffield, Hallam)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of maternity and neonatal safety improvement schemes on mitigating the effects of inequalities in perinatal deaths.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

In March 2023, NHS England published its three-year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services. This sets out how the National Health Service will make maternity and neonatal care more equitable, as well as safer and more personalised.

The three-year delivery plan is based on evidence, including the impact on inequalities where available, and wide consultation. NHS England is tracking the impact on maternity and neonatal outcomes based on ethnicity and deprivation.

A central ambition of the delivery plan is to reduce inequalities in access, experience and outcomes for women and babies. This is being delivered through the implementation of Local Maternity and Neonatal Systems equity and equality action plans and advocating a proportionate universalism approach, alongside targeted service models designed to reduce inequalities, including enhanced midwifery continuity of carer and culturally sensitive genetics services for high need areas.

NHS England is also providing training and resources for all maternity and neonatal staff, so they can deliver culturally competent and sensitive care. This includes access to cultural competence training, developed in partnership with the Royal College of Midwives, and provision of clinical training aids to support care for women and babies with black or dark skin. In November 2023, NHS England offered £50,000 funding to each NHS England regional team in England to implement ethnic minority workforce training to upskill staff and promote more equitable experience for service users.

In January 2024, the NHS Race and Health Observatory launched the Learning and Action Network in partnership with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Health Foundation. The Learning and Action Network will utilise an anti-racism approach to quality improvement to drive clinical transformation and enable system-wide change. It will work with nine healthcare systems to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Additionally, the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC’s) national maternity inspection programme, which completed in December 2023, looked at how services are addressing inequalities in maternity care through a safety and leadership lens. The CQC will be reporting on their findings from the inspection programme later this year and will include findings relating to inequalities.


Written Question
Maternity Services: Safety
Thursday 1st February 2024

Asked by: Olivia Blake (Labour - Sheffield, Hallam)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps her Department is taking to ensure that maternity and neonatal safety improvement schemes include a focus on mitigating the effects of inequalities.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

In March 2023, NHS England published its three-year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services. This sets out how the National Health Service will make maternity and neonatal care more equitable, as well as safer and more personalised.

The three-year delivery plan is based on evidence, including the impact on inequalities where available, and wide consultation. NHS England is tracking the impact on maternity and neonatal outcomes based on ethnicity and deprivation.

A central ambition of the delivery plan is to reduce inequalities in access, experience and outcomes for women and babies. This is being delivered through the implementation of Local Maternity and Neonatal Systems equity and equality action plans and advocating a proportionate universalism approach, alongside targeted service models designed to reduce inequalities, including enhanced midwifery continuity of carer and culturally sensitive genetics services for high need areas.

NHS England is also providing training and resources for all maternity and neonatal staff, so they can deliver culturally competent and sensitive care. This includes access to cultural competence training, developed in partnership with the Royal College of Midwives, and provision of clinical training aids to support care for women and babies with black or dark skin. In November 2023, NHS England offered £50,000 funding to each NHS England regional team in England to implement ethnic minority workforce training to upskill staff and promote more equitable experience for service users.

In January 2024, the NHS Race and Health Observatory launched the Learning and Action Network in partnership with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and the Health Foundation. The Learning and Action Network will utilise an anti-racism approach to quality improvement to drive clinical transformation and enable system-wide change. It will work with nine healthcare systems to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Additionally, the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC’s) national maternity inspection programme, which completed in December 2023, looked at how services are addressing inequalities in maternity care through a safety and leadership lens. The CQC will be reporting on their findings from the inspection programme later this year and will include findings relating to inequalities.


Written Question
Foster Care: Ethnic Groups
Tuesday 30th January 2024

Asked by: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they intend to meet representatives of Barnardo’s to discuss developing a Black Foster Care Network to improve the experiences of Black children in care.

Answered by Baroness Barran - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Education)

I refer the noble Lady to the answer of 15 January 2024 to Question 8232.


Written Question
Dementia: Research
Tuesday 30th January 2024

Asked by: Kirsten Oswald (Scottish National Party - East Renfrewshire)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if she will take steps to ensure that funding provided by her Department for research into dementia is allocated on the basis of whether people undertaking that research reflect the diversity of people affected by that illness.

Answered by Andrew Stephenson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is strongly committed to supporting research into dementia. Governmental responsibility for delivering dementia research is shared between the Department of Health and Social Care, with research delivered by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), and the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, with research delivered via UK Research and Innovation.

The NIHR is committed to equality, diversity, and inclusion. When populations are excluded from health and care research it leads to biases, bad science, and skewed results. The NIHR understands that more diverse and inclusive health and care research can prove whether medicines and treatments will benefit people from all backgrounds, and for that reason it supports Join Dementia Research to increase the number and diversity of people participating in dementia research. Based on the latest published data, the diversity of research participants in NIHR-funded Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) in all areas of disease in 2022, mirrored the 2011 census data on ethnicity and sex across England and Wales. Data shows that NIHR RCT research participants were 86% white, 4% black, 5% Asian, and 5% of other minority ethnic groups. Male and female participation was equal to the population, at 49% and 51%, respectively. The NIHR strives to develop researchers from multiple disciplines, specialisms, geographies and backgrounds, and works to address barriers to career progression arising from characteristics such as sex, race or disability. Diverse people and communities shape NIHR funded research.


Written Question
Electronic Cigarettes: Sales
Tuesday 30th January 2024

Asked by: Peter Gibson (Conservative - Darlington)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps she is taking to help tackle the sale of illegal vapes.

Answered by Andrea Leadsom - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)

The Government is concerned about the worrying rise in illicit and underage vaping, with rates of youth vaping tripling in the last three years. Illicit vapes can contain unknown ingredients, stronger nicotine, and are made available to children through black market channels.

Local enforcement agencies are responsible for ensuring that suppliers and retailers of vapes comply with strict Government regulations. Selling illegal vapes can result in an unlimited fine and even a custodial sentence, as well as imprisonment of up to two years upon conviction.

The Government is significantly increasing investment for our enforcement agencies to tackle these issues. In October 2023 the Prime Minister announced an increase of £30 million per year for enforcement agencies to help stamp out the illicit tobacco and vape trade. This is in addition to the £3 million investment announced in April 2023 to set up a national illicit vapes enforcement unit, aimed at addressing the issue of illegal and underage vaping, which is overseen by National Trading Standards.


Written Question
Autism and Learning Disability: Community Care
Tuesday 30th January 2024

Asked by: Robert Buckland (Conservative - South Swindon)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 25 October 2023 to Question 202692 on Autism and Learning Disability: Community Care, what the allocation was to each Integrated Care Board for Community/ CYP key workers.

Answered by Maria Caulfield - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) (Minister for Women)

NHS England made a funding allocation for learning disability and autism services, otherwise known as community and children and young people keyworker services, totalling £121.7 million in 2023/24. The following table shows the breakdown of this funding allocation by integrated care board (ICB):

ICB

Organisation Region

Funding allocation 2023/24 (£’000)

Healthier Lancashire and South Cumbria ICB

North West

3,964

South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw ICB

North East and Yorkshire

3,044

Herefordshire and Worcestershire ICB

Midlands

1,618

Mid and South Essex ICB

East of England

2,427

Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB

East of England

1,963

Birmingham and Solihull ICB

Midlands

3,197

Cumbria and North East ICB

North East and Yorkshire

6,929

Joined Up Care Derbyshire ICB

Midlands

2,276

Suffolk and North East Essex ICB

East of England

2,119

Devon ICB

South West

2,584

Lincolnshire ICB

Midlands

1,627

Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland ICB

Midlands

2,119

Our Healthier South East London ICB

London

3,954

Kent and Medway ICB

South East

3,862

Hertfordshire and West Essex ICB

East of England

2,969

East London Health and Care Partnership ICB

London

4,356

North London Partners In Health and Care ICB

London

3,287

Norfolk and Waveney Health and Care Partnership ICB

East of England

2,280

Staffordshire and Stoke On Trent ICB

Midlands

2,394

Frimley Health and Care ICB

South East

1,435

Sussex Health and Care Partnership ICB

South East

3,629

Shropshire and Telford and Wrekin ICB

Midlands

1,074

Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership ICB

North West

6,623

Humber, Coast and Vale ICB

North East and Yorkshire

3,618

Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire ICB

South West

1,848

Northamptonshire ICB

Midlands

1,545

Gloucestershire ICB

South West

1,267

Hampshire and The Isle Of Wight ICB

South East

3,744

North West London Health and Care Partnership ICB

London

4,924

Somerset ICB

South West

1,242

Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Health and Care ICB

Midlands

2,501

Cornwall and The Isles Of Scilly Health and Social Care Partnership ICB

South West

1,304

Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and Berkshire West ICB

South East

3,425

The Black Country and West Birmingham ICB

Midlands

2,691

Cambridgeshire and Peterborough ICB

East of England

1,769

Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire ICB

South West

2,067

Dorset ICB

South West

1,705

South West London Health and Care Partnership ICB

London

3,031

West Yorkshire and Harrogate (Health and Care Partnership) ICB

North East and Yorkshire

5,232

Coventry and Warwickshire ICB

Midlands

2,011

Surrey Heartlands Health and Care Partnership ICB

South East

2,034

Cheshire and Merseyside ICB

North West

6,003


Written Question
Army: Training
Thursday 25th January 2024

Asked by: Luke Pollard (Labour (Co-op) - Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of army recruits from (a) Black,(b) Asian and (c) minority ethnic backgrounds complete their Phase (i) 1 and (ii) 2 training.

Answered by Andrew Murrison - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence)

The tables below show Regular Army Other Rank Untrained Intake actuals and proportion completing Phase 1 and Phase 2 Training by Financial Year and Ethnicity, 2018-19 to 2022-23.

Regular Army Other Rank Untrained Intake proportion completing Phase 1 Training by Financial Year and Ethnicity, 2018-19 to 2022-23

% of untrained Phase 1 intake by ethnicity

2018-19

2019-20

2020-21

2021-22

2022-23

Total Ethnic Minority Untrained Intake

92%

93%

88%

86%

82%

Asian Ethnicity Untrained Intake

94%

88%

91%

86%

79%

Black Ethnicity Untrained Intake

95%

95%

92%

89%

87%

Mixed Ethnicity Untrained Intake

84%

86%

77%

78%

74%

Other Ethnic Minority Untrained Intake

96%

97%

92%

89%

90%

Regular Army Other Rank Untrained Intake proportion completing Phase 2 Training by Financial Year and Ethnicity, 2018-19 to 2022-23

Phase 2 completion figures in the most recent Financial Years are subject to change due to personnel still in the training pipeline who may either complete Phase 2 training or leave the Regular Army during training.

% of untrained Phase 2 intake by ethnicity

2018-19

2019-20

2020-21

2021-22

2022-23

Total Ethnic Minority Untrained Intake

89%

90%

82%

76%

36%

Asian Ethnicity Untrained Intake

94%

87%

85%

80%

33%

Black Ethnicity Untrained Intake

94%

93%

87%

80%

39%

Mixed Ethnicity Untrained Intake

76%

82%

69%

63%

29%

Other Ethnic Minority Untrained Intake

85%

95%

85%

79%

49%

Notes/Caveats:

  1. The figures are for the Regular Army only and therefore exclude Gurkhas, Full Time Reserve Service, Mobilised Reserves, Army Reserve and all other Reserves, but includes those personnel that have transferred from GURTAM to UKTAP.

  1. All intake figures are for Untrained Intake which includes all Other Ranks joining the Army and starting Phase 1 Training. All intake figures exclude personnel who have joined Phase 1 Training from another Service.

  1. These percentages include those still in the training pipeline. This refers to individuals who have not yet completed Phase 1 or 2 training and who have also not left the Regular Army. They are therefore still undertaking some elements of training, and could either still leave the Army as Untrained or become trained hence affecting the overall percentages.

  1. These percentages include individuals who have left the Army without completing either Phase 1 or Phase 2 training as a Regular. This includes personnel who may have transferred to another population (e.g. Reserve FR20, etc.) but excludes individuals who have transferred to another Service.

  1. Ethnicity is an individual's latest recorded Ethnicity on the Army's administrative systems. Mixed Ethnicity comprises Mixed Black African and White, Mixed Asian and White, Mixed Black Caribbean and White and other Mixed Ethnic Backgrounds. Asian comprises Asian Bangladeshi, Asian Pakistani, Asian Indian and other Asian Backgrounds, and reflecting changes made in the 2011 Census, now includes Chinese. Black comprises Black Caribbean, Black African and other Black Backgrounds. Other is defined as "Other Ethnic Background" and includes Arab. Ethnic Minority includes all of the previously mentioned Ethnicities.

  1. Personnel with an unknown Ethnicity on Intake to the Regular Army have not been included in the above figures. Approximately 5% of all Total Other Rank Untrained Intake over the time period had an unknown Ethnicity. Some of these unknown values may be Ethnic Minorities.

  1. Ethnicity intake figures will not match the published Biannual Diversity Statistics as figures above are only for untrained intake and exclude individuals joining the Army Phase 1 or Phase 2 Trained.

Written Question
Treatment of, and Outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Individuals in the Criminal Justice System Independent Review
Wednesday 24th January 2024

Asked by: Lord Bishop of Manchester (Bishops - Bishops)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they will publish an updated progress report on implementation of recommendations in David Lammy MP’s Review into the treatment of, and outcomes for, Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic individuals in the Criminal Justice System, published in September 2017.

Answered by Lord Bellamy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Justice)

This Spring, the Government will update Parliament regarding the work of the Inclusive Britain strategy, as it did in April last year. As we work towards this, we are also considering what further updates may be provided from the Ministry of Justice regarding our work to tackle racial disparities in the Criminal Justice System, including the work we committed to in response to the Lammy Review.


Written Question
Artificial Intelligence and ICT: Postgraduate Education
Wednesday 24th January 2024

Asked by: Peter Kyle (Labour - Hove)

Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology:

To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the (a) effectiveness of and (b) adequacy of the levels of industry co-funding for the AI and data science postgraduate conversion course scholarship programme.

Answered by Saqib Bhatti - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

The £30 million AI and Data Science Conversion Course programme was established in 2020 to broaden the supply of talent in the UK AI labour market. It funded universities to develop masters level AI or data science courses suitable for non-STEM students and 2,600 scholarships for students from backgrounds underrepresented in the tech industry.

We are already seeing the positive impact the programme is having in addressing the AI skills gap. As of March 2023 6,300 students have enrolled on the programme, almost three times our targets. 73% of scholarships awarded to women, 35% awarded to Black students, and 26% awarded to disabled students. The courses are successfully converting non-STEM students to enter the AI labour market: 88% of employed graduates were in employment directly related to AI or data science, either in the public or private sector.

In 2023 an industry co-funding element was added, whereby industry could support the programme through in-kind support or scholarship funding. As of November 2023, this amounted to over £6.5 million in in-kind support and scholarship funding. The in-kind contributions directly support student employability and includes co-design and delivery of course content to ensure students gain skills to meet sector need; providing access to software and applications to support learning and skills development; and opportunities to engage with industry through employer-led talks and workshops, industry mentoring support, and provision of work-based projects and placements.