Mar. 06 2024
Source Page: AI and Public Standards: 2023 regulators survey and responsesFound: AI and Public Standards: 2023 regulators survey and responses
Asked by: Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour - Life peer)
Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the case for reviewing the expiry dates of antibiotics, including in respect of savings for public expenditure.
Answered by Lord Markham - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care)
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the Government agency responsible for ensuring that medicines and medical devices work and are acceptably safe, has not made an assessment on the case for reviewing the expiry dates of antibiotics.
Medicine expiry dates, including for antibiotics, are necessary to ensure that the safety and effectiveness of a medicine is maintained over its long-term shelf life. The active ingredient in many medicines can degrade over time resulting in a loss of potency or the formation of impurities in the product. Physical changes to a medicine such as discolouration, may also occur upon prolonged storage. Medicine expiry dates are supported by stability studies completed by the pharmaceutical company, which demonstrate that a medicine remains safe and effective throughout its shelf life. Any change to the expiry date of a medicine requires an independent review of the stability data by the MHRA.
Companies can and often do extend the shelf life of their medicines once the product is on the market, and as additional stability data become available. It is not possible, however, to extend the expiry date of all medicines unilaterally in the absence of supporting stability data.
Asked by: Mundell, Oliver (Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party - Dumfriesshire)
Question
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of it approaching four years since the report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review, First Do No Harm, was published, and that three years have nearly passed since the Scottish Government published its plan for delivering on its commitment to implement, in full, the recommendations of the review, whether it will (a) provide an update on its delivery plan and (b) confirm when it expects to implement the remaining recommendations of the review to improve the lives of those impacted by sodium valproate, Primados and mesh implants.
Answered by Minto, Jenni - Minister for Public Health and Women's Health
There has been progress in implementing the Scottish Government’s delivery plan:
The Scottish Government considers, further to the undertaking offered in 2021, that it is taking appropriate action to pursue the outcomes sought by all of the recommendations of the 2020 report insofar as they relate to devolved matters.
Feb. 29 2024
Source Page: Medicines and Medical Devices Act report 2024Found: Medicines and Medical Devices Act report 2024
Report Feb. 29 2024
Committee: Health and Social Care Committee (Department: Department of Health and Social Care)Found: Before her death, the patient was visited by an independent psychiatrist and an independent physician
Oral Evidence Feb. 28 2024
Inquiry: Emerging diseases and learnings from covid-19Found: Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Service, and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust Oral Evidence
Feb. 28 2024
Source Page: Regulatory Horizons Council: Regulating Quantum Technology ApplicationsFound: safety and mitigating risks .
Correspondence Feb. 28 2024
Committee: Health, Social Care and Sport CommitteeFound: Hughes report about redress options to Valproate and Pelvic Mesh Letter from Minister for Public Health
Feb. 27 2024
Source Page: Supplementary Estimates 2023-24Found: the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
Feb. 27 2024
Source Page: Supplementary Estimates 2023-24Found: the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.