Bevacizumab

(asked on 20th November 2017) - View Source

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether patients are given the choice between Avastin and Lucentis in the treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration.


Answered by
Lord O'Shaughnessy Portrait
Lord O'Shaughnessy
This question was answered on 30th November 2017

Bevacizumab (Avastin) is not licensed for the treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration and it is up to the manufacturer to seek a licence for a specific indication.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is currently developing a clinical guideline on the diagnosis and management of age-related macular degeneration. NICE’s draft guideline, which has been consulted upon and is subject to change, stated that “no clinically significant differences in effectiveness and safety between aflibercept, ranibizumab and bevacizumab have been seen in the trials considered by the guideline committee.” NICE currently expects to publish final guidance in January 2018. Eylea and Lucentis are the brand names for aflibercept and ranibizumab respectively.

The Department has made no detailed estimate of the cost saving to the National Health Service if bevacizumab were to be used instead of ranbizumab (Lucentis) for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.

Clinicians can prescribe any treatment in consultation with their patient including an unlicensed product or a product not licensed for a particular indication, which they consider to be the best available medicine to meet the individual clinical needs of their patient, subject to the local commissioner of NHS services agreeing to fund the treatment.

Reticulating Splines