Energy: Private Rented Housing

(asked on 12th February 2026) - View Source

Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of minimum energy efficiency standards exemptions relating to leaseholder or third-party consent on progress towards improving energy efficiency in the private rented sector.


Answered by
Lord Whitehead Portrait
Lord Whitehead
Minister of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero)
This question was answered on 26th February 2026

The impact assessment published alongside the government response to the improving the energy performance of privately rented homes consultation contains information on the expected impact of third party consent exemptions on improving energy efficiency in the private rented sector. The treatment of exemptions in the PRS MEES modelling is found in the attached table.

Table - Treatment of exemptions in the PRS MEES modelling

Exemption

Treatment in modelling

High-Cost exemption

Modelled: If the cost of making even the cheapest improvement exceeds the cost cap, we do not upgrade a property.

All Relevant Improvements Made exemption

Modelled: If no relevant improvements can be made then no improvements are made in the modelling.

Cost Cap exemption

Modelled: Where landlords install measures and hit the cost cap before reaching MEES, the model stops upgrading the property.

Property Value Adjustment exemption (affordability exemption)

Not modelled: This exemption allows landlords of properties valued below £100,000 to work to a cost cap that is 10% of the property’s value. The NBM does not contain property prices to allow robust modelling of the exemption.

Solid Wall Insulation (SWI) exemption

Modelled: For simplicity, we assume all landlords who can take advantage of this exemption do so (there may in reality be a small number of landlords who still wish to install SWI). Thus, our modelling results do not include SWI.

Negative Impacts exemption

Not modelled: We do not account for specific cases where a measure is recommended on an EPC, but determined to negatively impact a property or its value through some other assessment.

Third-Party Consent exemption

Partially modelled: We do account for in-situ tenants not consenting to improvements at a rate of 10%. However, we do not account for refused consent from other third parties, including superior landlords (freeholders) and local authorities through planning permission processes.

New landlord exemption

Not modelled: We do not account for property transfers, but given new landlords exemptions only last for 6 months this will not significantly affect modelling results

Reticulating Splines