Question to the Department for International Development:
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what the total value was in each of the last six years of Commonwealth Development Corporation investments in (a) India and (b) South Africa by (i) state and (ii) economic sector.
India
i) Disbursements in India by state
The percentage of CDC’s disbursement going to the poorest states in India (classified as ‘A’ states under CDC’s development impact grid) has risen from 8% in 2009-11 (before CDC adopted a new strategy in 2012), to 30% 2012-14, to 42% in 2015.
Amount disbursed | |||
State in India | 2009- 2011 | 2012-2014 | 2015 |
Assam | 459,014 | 445,898 | |
Bihar | 4,006,784 | 6,873,457 | |
Chhattisgarh | 2,426,168 | 1,014,484 | 1,741,145 |
Jammu & Kashmir | 90,684 | 4,367 | |
Jharkhand | 153,963 | 227,322 | 1,254,654 |
Madhya Pradesh | 1,055,762 | 8,616,980 | 18,220,511 |
Nagaland | 68,013 | 3,275 | |
Odisha | 2,665,999 | 5,140,926 | 996,051 |
Rajasthan | 28,016 | 14,788,169 | 11,202,038 |
Tripura | 17,059,696 | ||
Uttar Pradesh | 7,410,434 | 11,451,417 | 11,921,586 |
West Bengal | 4,147,664 | 14,372,807 | 4,076,014 |
Meghalaya | 100,777 | 64,812 | |
Mizoram | 68,013 | 3,275 | |
Andhra Pradesh | 69,193,376 | 7,910,934 | 524,070 |
Himachal Pradesh | 201,568 | 108,890 | 161,243 |
Karnataka | 21,385,167 | 28,669,264 | 14,457,966 |
Kerala | 3,984,212 | 495,743 | 1,062,647 |
Telangana | 2,301,142 | ||
Chandigarh | 1,410,680 | 125,060 | 65,852 |
Delhi | 3,741,321 | 10,797,123 | 10,082,935 |
Goa | 779,865 | 167,817 | |
Gujarat | 1,506,022 | 13,990,969 | 6,898,106 |
Haryana | 9,951,775 | 16,546,866 | 3,859,030 |
Maharashtra | 66,635,038 | 36,870,050 | 23,360,223 |
Pondicherry | 75,262 | 503,164 | |
Punjab | 1,223,827 | 15,647,394 | |
Tamil Nadu | 15,666,838 | 21,641,697 | 22,515,359 |
Uttarakhand | 1,250,854 | 785,023 | 1,300,230 |
Grand Total | 212,814,857 | 202,727,105 | 174,472,815 |
Footnote - The above shows annual disbursements allocated state by state by CDC Development Impact team based on expected use of funds. This % is indicative for the portfolio valuation, as Indian companies do not account on a state-by-state basis.
ii) Economic Sector by total portfolio value (£m)
Sector | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Agribusiness & Food | 5.4 | 4.2 | 10.2 | 11.0 | 20.6 | 24.7 |
Consumer Services | 22.7 | 25.4 | 30.5 | 45.5 | 54.1 | 43.2 |
Education | 4.9 | 4.7 | 7.5 | 8.7 | 10.7 | 10.0 |
Extractive Industries | 11.6 | 5.7 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 1.9 |
Financial | 50.9 | 44.9 | 69.9 | 82.6 | 138.6 | 209.9 |
Health care | 153.5 | 52.5 | 59.9 | 65.1 | 118.8 | 138.8 |
Industrials | 88.9 | 99.4 | 96.8 | 87.3 | 96.0 | 107.2 |
Information & communications technology | 27.3 | 27.9 | 30.0 | 26.7 | 32.2 | 32.1 |
Infrastructure | 132.5 | 129.5 | 129.1 | 116.8 | 119.9 | 105.3 |
Real Estate | 17.1 | 21.6 | 23.2 | 19.5 | 17.4 | 15.9 |
Grand Total | 514.8 | 415.8 | 462.1 | 467.0 | 613.0 | 689.1 |
South Africa
i) Total value of investments by state
South African companies do not account value on a state-by-state basis. CDC does not assess its South African investments by State.
ii) Economic Sector by total portfolio value (£m)
Sector | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Agribusiness & Food | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 10.3 | 10.2 |
Consumer Services | 32.5 | 31.9 | 35.2 | 29.9 | 32.6 | 5.9 |
Extractive Industries | 12.8 | 4.5 | 6.0 | 5.8 | 7.4 | 7.1 |
Financial | 56.7 | 61.1 | 67.4 | 67.4 | 19.4 | 21.2 |
Health care | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Industrials | 104.5 | 99.5 | 97.5 | 70.5 | 50.5 | 27.7 |
Information & communications technology | 3.8 | 16.3 | 19.2 | 19.8 | 23.2 | 18.8 |
Infrastructure | 3.9 | 5.6 | 41.0 | 143.8 | 135.0 | 90.6 |
Real Estate | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Grand Total | 220.4 | 225.1 | 272.7 | 345.5 | 278.4 | 181.5 |