Primary Education: Standards

(asked on 27th October 2016) - View Source

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the relative level of pupil performance in West Sussex at key stage (a) 1, (b) 2, (c) 3 and (d) 4 compared to the average such performance in England.


Answered by
Nick Gibb Portrait
Nick Gibb
This question was answered on 9th November 2016

Information on pupil performance in West Sussex and nationally at Key Stages 1, 2 and 4 is published as part of the “Phonics screening check and key stage 1 assessments: England 2016”[1], “National curriculum assessments: key stage 2, 2016 (provisional)”[2] and “GCSE and equivalent results: 2015 to 2016 (provisional)”[3] statistical first releases (SFRs).

The Department no longer collects information on Key Stage 3 results. Further details are available in the secondary school accountability consultation response[4].

The table below shows 2016 teacher assessed provisional attainment information for pupils at the end of Key Stage 1:

[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/phonics-screening-check-and-key-stage-1-assessments-england-2016

[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/national-curriculum-assessments-key-stage-2-2016-provisional

[3] https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gcse-and-equivalent-results-2015-to-2016-provisional

[4]https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249893/Consultation_response_Secondary_School_Accountability_Consultation_14-Oct-13_v3.pdf

State funded schools

West Sussex

England

Number of eligible pupils1

Percentage reaching the expected standard2

Percentage reaching the higher standard

Number of eligible pupils1

Percentage reaching the expected standard2

Percentage reaching the higher standard

Reading

9,240

69

16

641,598

74

24

Writing

9,240

53

7

641,598

65

13

Mathematics

9,240

65

9

641,598

73

18

Science3

9,240

78

-

641,595

82

-

Source: Key Stage 1 attainment information

Notes:

  1. Includes pupils who are absent, disapplied, working below/towards the expected standard and reached a higher standard at the end of key stage 1. Excludes pupils with missing teacher assessments.
  2. Includes those working at the expected standard and those working at greater depth within the expected standard.
  3. The percentage reaching the higher standard for science is not applicable

The table below shows 2016 provisional attainment information for pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 in reading, writing (teacher assessment) and mathematics:

State funded schools1

West Sussex

England

Number of eligible pupils2

Percentage reaching the expected standard3

Percentage achieving a high score4

Number of eligible pupils2

Percentage reaching the expected standard3

Percentage achieving a high score4

Reading, writing and mathematics

8,276

44

2

586,181

52

5

Source: 2015/16 (Provisional) Primary school performance data

Notes:

  1. Figures for academies, free schools and CTCs are included in the individual LA figures and also in the total for England state-funded schools. Figures for hospital schools and pupil referral units are excluded.
  2. Includes pupils who have reached the end of key stage 2 in all of reading, writing and mathematics. Excludes pupils with lost test results but includes those with missing results and those with pending maladministration.
  3. Includes those pupils who reached the expected standard in all of reading, writing and mathematics. The expected standard in reading and mathematics is a scaled score of 100 or above. The expected standard in writing is a teacher assessment of 'working at the expected standard' (EXS) or 'working at greater depth within the expected standard' (GDS).
  4. Includes those pupils who reached a higher standard in all of reading, writing and mathematics. A higher standard is a scaled score of 110 or more in reading and mathematics and pupils assessed as working at greater depth within the expected standard (GDS) in writing.

The table below shows 2016 provisional GCSE and equivalent entries and achievements of pupils at the end of Key Stage 4:

State funded schools1

West Sussex

England

Number of pupils at the end of key stage 42

8,129

538,623

Pupils entered for all components

Percentage of pupils who achieved

Pupils entered for all components

Percentage of pupils who achieved

A*-C in English and maths GCSEs

96.7

64.5

96.8

62.8

English Baccalaureate

40.9

26.0

39.7

24.6

State funded schools

West Sussex

England

Average attainment 8 score per pupil3

50.7

49.9

State funded schools

West Sussex

England

Number of pupils included in the measure

Average Progress 8 score4

Number of pupils included in the measure

Average Progress 8 score4

Progress 83

7,756

0.11

512,368

-0.03

Source: 2015/16 key stage 4 attainment data (Provisional)

Notes: 1. Cover achievements in state-funded schools only. They do not include pupils recently arrived from overseas and so will not match with state-funded figures in the main tables.

2. Includes entries and achievements by these pupils in previous academic years.

3. Attainment 8 and Progress 8 are part of the new secondary accountability system being implemented for all schools from 2016. Attainment 8 is calculated for all schools, Progress 8 is calculated for state-funded schools and non-maintained special schools only. More information on the calculation of these measures is available in the Progress 8 guidance:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/progress-8-school-performance-measure

4. A Progress 8 score of 1.0 means pupils in the group make on average a grade more progress than the national average; a score of -0.5 means they make on average half a grade less progress than average. Progress 8 scores should be interpreted alongside the associated confidence intervals. If the lower bound of the confidence interval is greater than zero, it can be interpreted as meaning that the group achieves greater than average progress compared to pupils in mainstream schools nationally and that this is statistically significant. If the upper bound is negative, this means that the group achieves lower than average progress compared to pupils in mainstream schools nationally and that this is statistically significant.

Reticulating Splines