Schengen Agreement: ICT

(asked on 16th October 2014) - View Source

Question to the Home Office:

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 2 September 2014, to Question 207060, on what grounds the Government considers that Article 34 alerts from other EU Member States under Council Decision 2007/533/JHA will not require UK authorities actively to ascertain and communicate the place of residence or domicile of the relevant persons, given the provision of Article 35 of that Decision.


Answered by
Karen Bradley Portrait
Karen Bradley
This question was answered on 24th October 2014

Council Decision 2007/533/JHA is legislative basis for governing the second generation of the Schengen Information System (SIS II) for the purposes of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters.

In line with Article 25(2) of Council Decision 2007/533/JHA, the National Crime Agency has the authority to refuse to validate Article 26 alerts on
proportionality grounds where a general instruction has been issued. This means that UK police officers will not arrest people subject to an Article 26 alert where there is a lack of proportionality.

Concerning Article 34 alerts, under Article 35 the UK authorities are not required actively to ascertain the place of residence or domicile of relevant persons, only to communicate such information. Clearly, if they do not hold such information it cannot be communicated. However, if there is supporting information that justifies activity to ascertain proactively the place of residence or domicile of relevant persons action will be taken by UK authorities.

Reticulating Splines