Official Development Assistance and the British Council Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateWilliam Wragg
Main Page: William Wragg (Independent - Hazel Grove)Department Debates - View all William Wragg's debates with the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
(4 years, 4 months ago)
Commons Chamber Lee Rowley
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lee Rowley 
        
    
        
    
        My right hon. Friend raises an important point, which I know he has pursued relentlessly; I am sure that he will continue to do so beyond the confines of my very limited contribution to today’s debate. I am sure that he can take the point up with a representative of the Executive, and I hope that he is successful in his course.
 Lee Rowley
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lee Rowley 
        
    
        
    
        If I may, I will make some progress, but I would be delighted to give way to my hon. Friend in a moment.
Probably what makes today’s debate so frustrating for people out there who may be watching and who do not share the consensus that is generally coming across is that in certain speeches—none of which was recent, I might add—it was as if we were arguing about whether to end aid in its entirety. Effectively, we are arguing today about whether we are going to spend an extraordinary amount of money on international aid or an incredible amount of money on international aid. We are allowing a debate to become skewed by a skirmish over an arbitrary percentage that was agreed back in the 1950s by the World Council of Churches on a basis of which I am still not 100% sure.