House of Lords: Numbers and Eligibility Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

House of Lords: Numbers and Eligibility

Viscount Hailsham Excerpts
Monday 9th December 2024

(3 days, 20 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Smith of Basildon Portrait Baroness Smith of Basildon (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, how and when we implement our manifesto is, as it is for every single party, a matter for the Government. One of the things I committed to this House is having discussions on how we implement 80; I said that in the first Answer. There is also the issue of participation. I think the House will want to have a view on those things, and I am happy to accept representations on how they are implemented.

Viscount Hailsham Portrait Viscount Hailsham (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, may I suggest that in future, Peers are appointed for a limited period, say 10 or 15 years?

Baroness Smith of Basildon Portrait Baroness Smith of Basildon (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, that was not the commitment in the Labour Party manifesto, but it has been raised with me by several noble Lords. There are different views across the House on that. I think the Burns report recommended 15 years, and another suggestion was 20 years. There is a choice for the House to make. I have not detected overall support for that. Partly, it has come about because much younger Peers have been appointed, and an appointment for life means that they are here for a very long time. The contrary to that is that hopefully, they will build up great expertise during their time here.