European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDepartment: Department for Exiting the European Union
Viscount Eccles
Main Page: Viscount Eccles (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Viscount Eccles's debates with the Department for Exiting the European Union
European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 5) Bill
Viscount Eccles ExcerptsMonday 8th April 2019
(5 years, 1 month ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 View all European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Commons Consideration of Lords Amendments as at 8 April 2019 - (8 Apr 2019)
Lord Judge
Of course it will be used by others. Lawyers use bad precedents constantly, but it does not mean that it has to be followed.
I did not intend to speak, for the reason I have given. This amendment will improve the Bill. That is the point of it. Beyond that, I do not wish to say any more, because it may indicate somehow that I am backing off from my concern about the Bill. So in lawyerly fashion I simply say that you have all heard the noble Lord, Lord Pannick. I agree with him. I have nothing to add.
Viscount Eccles
The noble and learned Lord tells us that it improves the Bill. Does it not change the Bill so materially that it is not the same Bill after all?
Lord Judge
No, it does not. We have to face the context, which is that the Commons has passed the Bill. So we are not having the first go at it; we are having a go at it after the Commons has resolved it.