To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 26 Mar 2015
Penrose Inquiry

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Penrose Inquiry

Written Question
Vulnerable Adults: Protection
Wednesday 25th March 2015

Asked by: Tom Clarke (Labour - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, whether it is his policy that local authorities should be required to provide appropriate support where it is identified through an official safeguarding inquiry that further support is needed to protect a person from the risk of abuse or neglect.

Answered by Norman Lamb

The Care Act 2014 clarifies and strengthens the processes to support adults who are at risk from abuse or neglect in the following ways:

- Where local authorities have reasonable cause to expect a person is at risk of abuse or neglect they must carry out a safeguarding enquiry, consider what if any actions are needed, and who should carry these out. This makes clear that there is no eligibility threshold and allows authorities flexibility to respond to a safeguarding issue appropriately, which may be through the authority or one of its partners such as the police.

- The statutory Care Act guidance clarifies that where a local authority has started a safeguarding enquiry but identifies a potential need for a care and support service, it should continue the needs assessment for care and support in parallel, and determine whether the person has eligible needs which it must meet. The eligibility criteria is based upon whether the person’s needs have a significant impact on their wellbeing, which includes abuse and neglect. While the authority is likely to have already identified any safeguarding issues earlier and made an enquiry, it would still consider these at the eligibility determination as it would clearly impact on the person’s wellbeing.

- The care and support system should support the above by having a comprehensive preventative strategy that promotes wellbeing and independence, and one that does not wait to respond when people reach a crisis point.


Speech in Westminster Hall - Tue 24 Mar 2015
Vaccine Damage Payments Act

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Vaccine Damage Payments Act

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 15 Jan 2015
Contaminated Blood

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Contaminated Blood

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 15 Jan 2015
Contaminated Blood

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Contaminated Blood

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 15 Jan 2015
Contaminated Blood

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Contaminated Blood

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 15 Jan 2015
Contaminated Blood

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Contaminated Blood

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 15 Jan 2015
Contaminated Blood

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Contaminated Blood

Written Question
Abortion
Tuesday 13th January 2015

Asked by: Tom Clarke (Labour - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, with reference to the Supreme Court decision on the Abortion Act 1967 in relation to staff of NHS Greater Glasgow and North Clyde in December 2014, if he will take steps to protect individual rights of conscience for administrative personnel in the NHS and ensure that the decisions of those who do not wish to be involved in any aspect of abortion procedures are respected; and if he will bring forward legislative proposals to clarify the legal rights of healthcare workers across the UK in relation to this issue.

Answered by Jane Ellison

The recent Supreme Court decision upholds the long standing interpretation of Section 4 of the Abortion Act that the right to object to participate in abortion treatment is limited to those staff who actually take part in treatment administered in a hospital or other approved place.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 13 Jan 2015
Oral Answers to Questions

Speech Link

View all Tom Clarke (Lab - Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions