All 3 Debates between Theresa Villiers and David Tredinnick

Northern Ireland

Debate between Theresa Villiers and David Tredinnick
Tuesday 16th July 2013

(10 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Theresa Villiers Portrait Mrs Villiers
- Hansard - -

I agree that comprehensive discussions are needed on issues such as parading, which is why I welcomed the establishment of the Haass group. As I said, I am happy to help in whatever way I can, and yes I am working closely with the First Minister and Deputy First Minister on the kind of economic measures needed to boost the economy in Northern Ireland, including through our economic package, which I hope will help the people in those deprived communities.

David Tredinnick Portrait David Tredinnick (Bosworth) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my right hon. Friend agree that it makes it more difficult for law enforcement agencies if parade routes are changed at short notice? We need the maximum possible notice.

Theresa Villiers Portrait Mrs Villiers
- Hansard - -

Certainly, for those organising big events, whether in Northern Ireland or elsewhere, advance planning is crucial to keeping people safe.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Theresa Villiers and David Tredinnick
Thursday 19th April 2012

(12 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Theresa Villiers Portrait Mrs Villiers
- Hansard - -

I am delighted that the Leicester Mercury is also on side, too. As the Secretary of State has made clear, we believe that it is important to invest in and upgrade our current rail network, as well as prepare for the challenges of the future with HS2. But it is only because this Government have made a decision to prioritise investment in transport, despite the deficit that we inherited from our predecessors, that we are having this conversation at all and it is the only reason that electrification of the midland main line is a real possibility.

David Tredinnick Portrait David Tredinnick (Bosworth) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my right hon. Friend agree that the project is tremendous value for money, because it will take pressure off the east and west coast main lines? With the prospect of a 60-minute journey from Leicester to London, there will be more demand on the line, so the cross-party support is genuine.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Theresa Villiers and David Tredinnick
Thursday 28th October 2010

(13 years, 6 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Tredinnick Portrait David Tredinnick (Bosworth) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

11. What proposals for improvements to the M1-M6 junction he is considering; and if he will make a statement.

Theresa Villiers Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Mrs Theresa Villiers)
- Hansard - -

I refer my hon. Friend to the oral statement made by the Secretary of State for Transport to the House on 26 October, and the supporting documentation. The preferred option for improving the junction is the proposal announced in February 2009 to provide free-flowing traffic links between the A14, the M1 and the M6.

David Tredinnick Portrait David Tredinnick
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my hon. Friend agree that that is one of the most dangerous junctions and one of the most important junctions on the motorway network? When does she expect the works there to be completed, and what other projects do the Government have to improve the M1 and M6 motorways?

Theresa Villiers Portrait Mrs Villiers
- Hansard - -

I agree that that is a very important junction on our strategic road network. That is one of the reasons why we have prioritised funding for the project at a time of intense pressure on the public finances because of the deficit that we inherited. I also agree that road safety is an important issue in this case. The Highways Agency is working hard to manage and mitigate the road safety impact of the current junction, but we believe that the scheme will provide additional long-term road safety benefits. The scheme is not likely to be able to be progressed before 2015, but we are working on a revised timetable, with a view to construction beginning some time after that period.