Parthenon Sculptures: Return Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Debbonaire
Main Page: Baroness Debbonaire (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Debbonaire's debates with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
(2 days, 2 hours ago)
Lords ChamberThere is time for both noble Lords to ask a question. We will have the noble Lord, Lord McNally, first, and then my noble friend.
The UK and Greece have a strong bilateral relationship, built on shared values and history, and we greatly value the friendship that exists between our peoples today. I would question the noble Lord’s definition of an excuse; it is a reason and a view, not an excuse.
My Lords, I thank my noble friend the Minister for her Answer and all the subsequent answers. If there is an object of religious significance to its country of origin which is seen as a work of art in a museum here, is there not a case for amending or at least considering ways of adapting legislation? Although it is not the Government’s decision, a museum director is not completely free to make a decision if they are constrained by existing legislation which may have been made many years ago.
We do not have any current plans to change the legislation. The noble Lord, Lord Parkinson, talked about loans. In many cases these artefacts can be loaned, and we would support that. The Bayeux Tapestry has been mentioned, and we are very fortunate in this country to be able to borrow items from other countries. We get them on the basis that people know we are going to return them, even if we would like to keep them.