Rail Investment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Rail Investment

Steve Baker Excerpts
Thursday 25th November 2010

(13 years, 12 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The bi-mode trains are one option that we will consider. Let me explain again the reasons for the complexity and the delay. We have a preferred bidder, selected by the previous Government. That preferred bidder, Agility Trains, has come back to us with a revised proposal that is significantly more attractive than the original proposal. We have been asked by Sir Andrew Foster’s review to reappraise the Agility Trains bid and to consider specific alternatives. We are carrying out that work. There are technical complexities and legal complexities, because of the procurement process. Of course, we must build a value-for-money case and compare the two options. I hope that it will be possible to make an announcement in January, and I expect it to be made early in the new year.

Steve Baker Portrait Steve Baker (Wycombe) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I welcome the Government’s sincere commitment to the economic renewal of the north, but what does my right hon. Friend say to people in Buckinghamshire who challenge both the route and the national interest case for high-speed rail?

Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait Mr Hammond
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I say to them that they will have an opportunity to make their case when we go to consultation on a preferred route in the new year.