All 3 Debates between Stephen Timms and Brandon Lewis

Northern Ireland Protocol: UK Legal Obligations

Debate between Stephen Timms and Brandon Lewis
Tuesday 8th September 2020

(4 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Brandon Lewis Portrait Brandon Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend, as often, is absolutely right; these provisions will be in the Bill to take effect if other things do not come through. I think that with both parties acting in good faith we will get to a position where these provisions become, in effect, irrelevant, exactly as he has outlined.

Stephen Timms Portrait Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Secretary of State recognise that, as others have reminded him, there would be terrible future consequences for Britain if the Government fail to abide by an international treaty they have signed? Does he recognise that—yes or no?

Brandon Lewis Portrait Brandon Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As I said earlier, I absolutely recognise the importance of following international laws and the rule of law. We have a unique situation with this treaty. Listening to what some Members have been saying from a sedentary position, it seems that there is a fundamental misunderstanding here; there are items and issues in the protocol that were always designed to be worked through in the Joint Committee, because they were not able to be agreed and worked through at the time of the protocol. What we will be outlining in the UK internal market Bill is what the UK Government’s position will be if that does not succeed, in order to ensure that we are delivering for the people of Northern Ireland as part of the internal and integral market of the United Kingdom.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Timms and Brandon Lewis
Monday 25th November 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Stephen Timms Portrait Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

5. What assessment he has made of local authorities’ use of article 4 directions to limit excessive occurrence of particular use types on high streets.

Brandon Lewis Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Brandon Lewis)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Local authorities are required to notify my Department of article 4 directions before they are brought into force. In the year to 31 October 2013, 97 article 4 directions have been made by 43 local authorities.

Stephen Timms Portrait Stephen Timms
- Hansard - -

Today the Treasury has finally moved on payday loans, which is welcome, so why is the Department making it easier for payday lenders, betting shops and fast-food takeaways to open up without planning permission? Does he recognise the concerns of the Local Government Association and others that article 4 directions are

“ineffective, inefficient and heavily bureaucratic”?

Brandon Lewis Portrait Brandon Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I appreciate that the right hon. Gentleman has shown a consistent interest in this area. Article 4 directions apply to different parts of the sectors that he has outlined and local authorities can use licensing and a range of other powers to keep things under control. I would suggest that the right hon. Gentleman discuss the matter with his Front-Bench team, which seems happy to be entertained by the gambling industry rather than do something productive about it for the benefit of our high streets.

Local Government Finance Bill

Debate between Stephen Timms and Brandon Lewis
Wednesday 31st October 2012

(12 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Stephen Timms Portrait Stephen Timms
- Hansard - -

On the point of simplicity, many of us, including Government Members, sat through the Welfare Reform Bill debates, in which the simplicity of universal credit was presented to us as a great advantage. This change undermines that simplicity—fatally, it seems to me. As the director of the Social Market Foundation said in an article this morning, under this proposal

“not only will you need a computer to work out your benefit entitlements, you’ll need a map”.

Brandon Lewis Portrait Brandon Lewis
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Coming from a party that had 32 different benefits to work through, I find that quite an amazing comment.