All 2 Debates between Stephen Gilbert and Dan Poulter

NHS (Government Spending)

Debate between Stephen Gilbert and Dan Poulter
Wednesday 28th January 2015

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a very good point. On this side of the House we believe that when we spend public money we should do so efficiently and effectively. We have also made Government spending much more efficient—[Interruption.] Rather than heckling, the hon. Member for Liverpool, Wavertree (Luciana Berger) might do well to listen to what I am about to say, because efficient public spending should be a priority for any Government, although it certainly was not for the previous Government. Cabinet Office figures, endorsed by the National Audit Office, show that £14.3 billion of savings, relative to 2009-10, have been made across many areas of expenditure, including procurement, work force, major projects and transformation. That is £850 for every working household saved by this Government, and clearly shows that we are spending public money much more efficiently and wisely than Labour ever did when in office.

Stephen Gilbert Portrait Stephen Gilbert (St Austell and Newquay) (LD)
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister agree that money can be spent only once? Labours say it wants to invest £2.5 billion from the mansion tax in the NHS, but it has already promised that to deficit reduction and introducing a 10p tax rate. That is nonsense.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a very good point. The mansion tax, which is alluded to as a major plank of the Opposition’s funding plans for the NHS, has already been spent three times—that is economic incompetence if nothing else.

--- Later in debate ---
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have just told the right hon. Gentleman very clearly that the cost of NHS managers doubled under the previous Labour Government, a profligate record of spending that has taken money away from front-line patient care.

Stephen Gilbert Portrait Stephen Gilbert
- Hansard - -

The Minister missed one thing from the list. A written parliamentary question revealed to me in 2010 that the Labour party spent £250 million paying private providers to do precisely nothing.

Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend makes a very important point. We could stand here all day talking about the inefficiencies and profligacy in running the NHS finances by the previous Labour Government. He is also right to highlight—

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Gilbert and Dan Poulter
Tuesday 26th November 2013

(11 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Dan Poulter Portrait Dr Poulter
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend speaks with considerable knowledge of the subject from her tradition and strong record of service. She will know that an important aspect of providing proper support for veterans is ensuring that we give their families the right support. We are working very closely with armed forces families and services charities to ensure that we do exactly that. That is why we have also put in place mental health first aid support for the families of servicemen and women to ensure that families know how to support veterans when they run into difficulties with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Stephen Gilbert Portrait Stephen Gilbert (St Austell and Newquay) (LD)
- Hansard - -

10. What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of section 64 grants in supporting children’s hospices.