Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (Accession) Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for International Trade

Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (Accession)

Simon Fell Excerpts
Wednesday 17th June 2020

(4 years, 4 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Elizabeth Truss Portrait Elizabeth Truss
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have been clear about my position on ISDS, but in the EU negotiations that are being conducted by our lead negotiator, David Frost, we are very clear we are not having a level playing field with the EU. One of the reasons for Brexit is so we can decide our own regulatory policy independently.

Simon Fell Portrait Simon Fell (Barrow and Furness) (Con)
- Hansard - -

I warmly welcome my right hon. Friend’s statement. The agreement goes much further than the EU-Japan economic partnership agreement of 2018 and there is much to like about it, not least for businesses in Cumbria that want to trade out and into the world. What assurances can she give me that we will not go back on our high food and environmental standards in joining this agreement?

Elizabeth Truss Portrait Elizabeth Truss
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are absolutely committed to our high standards. That is one of the reasons why countries and people around the world want to buy British products. They trust British products, they trust the Union Jack flag, and they appreciate what we offer. Let me be clear: any change to domestic legislation resulting from any trade agreement would need to be voted on by this House, so there is a clear parliamentary process to make sure that any change has full support, but we will not be lowering those standards.